User talk:Bksimonb

BKWSU information technology team

Talk:Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University/Archive02

Copyright issue

Simon,

we are still waiting for clarification on the position of copyright on God Shiva's images.

Can you tell us when to expect this? There would seem no good reason for delay.

Thanks Brahmakumaris.info 16:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

NPA to Bksimonb

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Bksimonb,

First, Sir I feel personally attacked by this: “Do not rant and rave on the discussion page of an article. That is for discussing the article only." I have been civil to you and your members of the Brahma Kumaris organisation. What I see here is that you are trying to work the system to hide your true practices, to suit your PR needs under a shield of "verifiable" sources approved by your members, while leaving others out that are quite legitimate. The truth cannot be forever shielded in secrecy. TalkAbout 21:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Reply posted on this thread. Regards Bksimonb 19:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Personal attack

Simon,

you wrote stating that;

"Sadly, this underlines how little due care and attention you are giving any given references that oppose your organization's current PR and, perhaps, how unaware or misled you have been of your own organization's history."

In case I have it entirely wrong, can you please verify when and whether the BKWSU told you and tells newcomers about, e.g.;

• the 40 years Confluence Age and failed 1976 Destruction scenario?
• the re-editing of the Sakar Murlis?
• the role that Kirpalani's parnet Sevak Ram played?
• the role of the Advance Party?

Indeed, when does the BKWSU actually tell people about;

• the importance of mediumship and channelling within the organization's spiritual practise (as listed on the old letterhead)? [1]

If you can read what I wrote and not see the concern and public interest that individual's are being willfully mislead ... what can I say?

What divine virtue is this you are practizing here? 195.82.106.244 20:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Please consider the statement, "...this underlines how little due care and attention you are giving...". I consider it to be a personal attack in that it is a clear accusation of negligence or, in this context, some kind of sinister cover-up. Also alleging that I am somehow "misled" is somewhat offensive in that it seems to imply I must be gullible or stupid. At the very least I would say the sentence wasn't very civil not least because the statements were stated as fact, not qualified as a personal opinion.

I really don't understand how the rest of your post justifies the remark in question. It seems to me to be a bit off-topic and perhaps intended to provoke a reaction.Bksimonb 19:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Srikeit 17:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

User:70.119.13.124

• Just to give you a fair chance, you had probably amend your comment from "may". Luis actualy signs himself or gives his email account whilst editing on that IP address User:70.119.13.124 e.g. [2]. Its a wonder you could just ask him or he could not remember. The discussion page is helpful too; [3]. I think it would look disingenuous of you not to point this out and I don't want to have to.

• The link to the "google flooding" is broken and I can't find it myself yet ... this one will at least get you to the right page; http://www.brahmakumaris.info/bb/viewtopic.php?t=324&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15. Your given link may be bound by a cookie or something.

• To make the user tags work, you need to go like this; [[User:Bksimonb|bksimonb]]. Note second name after a pipe; |

The same is true of IP users. 195.82.106.244 01:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)