Talk:Reservation in India: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:55, 22 April 2020

Reservation in India was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 6, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Skip to table of contents

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India: Politics C‑class Top‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article was last assessed in November 2012.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business C‑class Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Discrimination C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Education C‑class Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics C‑class Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sociology C‑class Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WAP assignment

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Reservation in India. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Reservation in India at the Reference desk.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2019 and 5 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mobeenb98 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Dinakmehta, Na.annamalai.

latest advances in reservation syastem

the section in which you have shown the advances in reservation system of india . there must have some more changes took place after 1995 so i need to know that

The information which you have mentioned under title “Beneficiary groups of the reservation system” may miss guide the reader.

Actually reserve category person can apply to Open or Reserve category. But as per you sentences they can apply both (Open and reserve category) which is not real fact, please confirm with the writer of this article.

Protected edit status

Seriously, why has no one done this yet? With a topic like Reservation there are bound to be idiots trying to promote their agendas on Wikipedia about how reservation is either the greatest thing to happen to India or lamenting the "plight of the General category student" denied their rightful place or how the rich sc/sts take all the benefits. C1MM (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to the lead section by User:JusticeCM

The following text added to the lead section by User:JusticeCM in these edits has been removed:

It is observed that even after 70 years of reservation the backward classes haven't been benefitted the way they should have been and reservation keeps getting extended after every 10 years.[2] One of the major reasons for this is no income cap on ST/SC reservations unlike OBC and EWS reservations where there is an income cap so that once a person is benefitted by reservation and is capable of earning a livelihood, he is no longer entitled to reservation. As there is no concept of creamy layer in ST/SC reservations, even the son, grandson and great grand son of any other class A officer gets the benefits of reservation who himself got reservation.[3] So the benefits get siphoned off by the effluent ST/SC's and are not able to percolate to the lower strata. Even the supreme court has directed the central government to introduce creamy layer concept in ST/SC reservation, but this is not possible because of vote bank politics.[4] So reservation is necessary in a country like India but rules for availing it should be changed for the overall development of people of backward classes.[5]

for the reasons mentioned below:

It is observed that even after 70 years of reservation the backward classes haven't been benefitted the way they should have been and reservation keeps getting extended after every 10 years.[2] One of the major reasons for this is no income cap on ST/SC reservations unlike OBC and EWS reservations where there is an income cap so that once a person is benefitted by reservation and is capable of earning a livelihood, he is no longer entitled to reservation. — WP:Original Research
As there is no concept of creamy layer in ST/SC reservations, even the son, grandson and great grand son of any other class A officer gets the benefits of reservation who himself got reservation.[3] — Adequately covered by However, no income criteria has been set for members of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes.
So the benefits get siphoned off by the effluent ST/SC's and are not able to percolate to the lower strata. — WP:Original Research
Even the supreme court has directed the central government to introduce creamy layer concept in ST/SC reservation, but this is not possible because of vote bank politics.[4] — The given citation doesn't say that the Supreme Court gave the claimed directive.
So reservation is necessary in a country like India but rules for availing it should be changed for the overall development of people of backward classes.[5] — Reads like essay and personal opinion.

The following text was modified:

Today anyone whose forefathers belonged to ST/SC community gets the benefits of reservation irrespective of his socioeconomic status.[1] to However, no income criteria has been set for members of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. --Skr15081997 (talk) 13:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 Actually reserve category person can apply to Open or Reserve category. But as per you sentences they can apply both (Open and reserve category) which is not real fact, please confirm with the writer of this article.
-== Advocacy groups etc as sources ==
-Please note that it is rarely a good idea to use advocacy groups as sources for information except with regard to themselves. For this reason, I have just removed the BSP and Dalit News Bureau sources, and also the World Christian Federation source that in any event did not support the statement for which it was cited. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 12:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 == Protected edit status ==