Talk:Reservation in India

Reservation in India was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 6, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Skip to table of contents

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India: Politics C‑class Top‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article was last assessed in November 2012.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business C‑class Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Discrimination C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Education C‑class Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics C‑class Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sociology C‑class Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WAP assignment

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Reservation in India. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Reservation in India at the Reference desk.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2019 and 5 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mobeenb98 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Dinakmehta, Na.annamalai.

latest advances in reservation syastem

the section in which you have shown the advances in reservation system of india . there must have some more changes took place after 1995 so i need to know that

The information which you have mentioned under title “Beneficiary groups of the reservation system” may miss guide the reader.

Actually reserve category person can apply to Open or Reserve category. But as per you sentences they can apply both (Open and reserve category) which is not real fact, please confirm with the writer of this article.

Someone please put protection on this page

Since reservation is of course highly charged many people will want to impose their own opinions on the page. Due to high chance of Vandalism, please put protection.— Preceding unsigned comment added by C1MM (talk • contribs) 00:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The current introductory paragraph is biased

The current introductory paragraph reads as extremely biased against the beneficiaries of the reservations and in fact reeks of the exact attitude toward them that the reservations were meant to protect them from. It may make sense as criticism of reservations, but surely the introductory paragraph as to be about what they are and why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.107.17.196 (talk) 16:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1.39.140.182 (talk) Agree, sample these sentences in the opening paragraph, which reads like fumigating drivel 'Reservation was intended to uplift these communities but the government's failure to control the amount of reservation and lack of comprehensive review of the policies have resulted in wide criticism and backlash. Critics have often described it as a menace primarily due to its anti-meritocratic nature, which they claim is causing further division and discrimination in the society.' We already have a separate section on criticism of reservation, what purpose does such sentences serve in the introduction? this is non NPOV

1.39.141.196 (talk) 13:00, 23 April 2021 (UTC) Editors, any comment? Can we remove the above text? 19:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)~~ 19:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)157.40.171.176 (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC) Editors, still awaiting go ahead for the above change[reply]