Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests

Archives

Previous requests & responses

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120
121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130
131, 132

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

Removing something from my Wiki - living celebrity

Hello,

I would like to have something removed from my wiki page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natasha_Leggero - someone is misrepresenting my early life by citing a joke that I made in public forum as fact.

"She has stated that a DNA test revealed 6% Sub-Saharan African ancestry.[8]" Source 8: "The Nightly Show". cc.com. Comedy Central. Retrieved June 17, 2015.

I would like this removed as it is part of a comedic routine and not something that should be cited as part of my biography. Please remove this ASAP. Thank you.

-Natasha Leggero — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8000:E107:4031:E076:EA1C:BD4D:69E2 (talk) 20:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 20:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re Daly Waters, Northern Territory, Australia.

(refactored) You mention in the article re Daly Waters that commercial aviation ceased in 1965. I wish to correct that statement, because from about September 1967 until August 1969, I was the Route Agent for both TAA and Ansett Airlines of Australia, servicing their F27 services from Adelaide to Darwin and reverse as they transited Daly WatersMChandler2 (talk) 11:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this post to Talk:Daly_Waters, Northern_Territory and added a "disputed" template to the unsourced reference to 1965 at Daly Waters, Northern Territory#History. Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 01:32, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External link to relevant content is being deleted

Hello,

I've been trying to post some relevant content located on an external site to one of the wiki pages. Specifically: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consolidated_PBY_Catalina

I have been trying to post a link to the images of the restoration of Catalina 2459 that started last July. Every time I post the link, an admin takes it down. I don't understand the reason for this. This is precisely the type of content that attracts people to Wikipedia so what is the policy that allows this?

There is no self promotion going on. You will not find my name or related information anywhere on the pages or images. I've volunteered to do this so I don't make a dime off the images. While visitors do show up at my site to view the images that's exactly what happens with every external link so I don't see that as an issue.

I've had no issue with any of the other historical aircraft I have posted on Wikipedia. Given the response I see from Wikipedia on these other aircraft, it's fulfilling Wikipedia's goal of providing the world with relevant information at great depth. It is also unique content in a unique format that can't be found anywhere else. Again, I am puzzled as to why the admin pulls the link.

Regarding this aircraft, this is the oldest flying PBY 5A Catalina in the world with 3 sub kills during WWII. It is being restored to its original configuration as a WWII sub hunter. This is a historically significant aircraft and I have been documenting the restoration for the Collings Foundation in Stow, MA. It is currently being restored at American Aero Services in New Smyrna Beach, FL.

The page I would like to post is here: http://americanaeroservices.com/pby5acatalina2459grphc2.html

 Along with the record of the restoration, these images also document the remarkable engineering that went into the Consolidated Vultee design dating to the 1930s.  On several levels this a significant and detailed look at the aircraft.

Please advise.

Thank you.

Regards,

John — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9001:3404:706:68D1:38B2:FC9E:FFB2 (talk) 21:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Based on your edits [1] from this IP, you have WP:BOLDly edited an article. That is fine. You have been reverted twice, you can see the stated reasons at [2], that is also fine. It seems plausible that you have made more similar edits from another IP, if that is so you are now WP:EDITWARing, that is not fine.

Now, your next step is to go to Talk:Consolidated PBY Catalina and start a discussion per WP:BRD. WP:ELYES, WP:ELMAYBE and WP:ELNO are probably relevant here. Good luck. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 22:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help to understand Wikipedia Criteria

Hi, I need some help to understand why an article I have written in my mother language Portuguese Wikipédia about a pro-gun institution was fast deleted and an admin agreed with that, and the same article I translated the best I can and published in the English Wikipedia was accepted and verified with no problem ???

Here are the twins en:PROARMAS (OK) - pt:PROARMAS (EXCLUDED)

They justified the exclusion by "no relevance", but this one is currently the most proheminent institution on this subject in Brazil, and there are a lot of sources and external links to prove that...

Thanks in advance. --MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 06:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

pt:Wikipedia and en:Wikipedia have different policies. Few editors here will be familiar with the policies at pt:Wikipedia, and we certainly won't have any influence over what happens there. Maproom (talk) 07:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marcric. The CSD they used looks very similar to our WP:A7. Maybe draft the article in your user space, make sure there are several citations to reliable sources such as newspapers and books, make sure there are credible claims of significance in the first paragraph, then move it or ask for a pt person's opinion on it? Good luck. –Novem Linguae (talk) 07:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You both @Maproom: and @Novem Linguae:. --MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 16:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Clive

Clarity, simplicity, and accuracy require time and effort. They also require generosity.

I just watched hours of effort abruptly disappear from my screen without explanation or warning while writing in a "sandbox" without any thought of anonymous censorship.

My subject was Robert Clive based on a semester paper that I wrote nearly 60 years ago about Clive's character and his influence on the western world. My resource was a newly-built library at the University of the South and the contemporary newspapers it contained.

I have been writing measurably useful material for 40 years and offered to share what I learned with Wiki.

But people can view writing differently.

To me, writing is the most elegant form of engineering -- the process of structuring ideas on paper. You begin with an idea and substantiate it. But as Clemenceau would say "Words can disguise thoughts." In the beginning Wiki offered useful information that is usefully presented and easily accessed -- first for programmers and then for writers.

The abrupt deletion of good faith writing and the redirection of my screen to references that suggest both plagiarism and thoughtful writing are against editorial policy - is unsettling.

The foundation of everything is logos.

Please return what you deleted.

Can you provide a link to the page where the deletion occurred? We'll take a look. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ping Rick's 2nd Faust. –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]