Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nora Young

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Clovermoss (talk | contribs) at 21:48, 3 July 2021 (Keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nora Young (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. The only sources I could find were trivial mentions of Nora Young and some student media that doesn't count toward notability based on WP:RSSM. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Being host of a nationally-networked radio program is the kind of notability claim where we should be making every effort to maintain an article rather than deleting them — and while I'll grant that most of the referencing here was bad, it really didn't require much effort to improve it: once again, the real issue is that for a person whose notability claim stretches back to the 1990s, you have to dig into databases, because Google is not going to find coverage from 30 or even 20 years ago. Bearcat (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Bearcat. Clovermoss (talk) 21:48, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]