Jump to content

User talk:Nimitz0vikrant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nimitz0vikrant (talk | contribs) at 08:16, 20 November 2023 (→February 2023: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, Nimitz0vikrant, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 13:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

Note: Please stop these unnecessary changes to images in naval ship articles. Your changes are not improvements, they just create work for others that need to review your edits and fix them. Read through the 'welcome' message just above, including all the links it contains. There is a good deal of information there for new users, including ways to start editing so that you can learn how to contribute more effectively. Thank you - wolf 14:38, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 16:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it necessary to put Giuseppe Garibaldi at the top?
Why is it necessary to put Cavour and other at the bottom? Nimitz0vikrant (talk) 08:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If my changes are unnecessary, I think the previous changes are also unnecessary. Nimitz0vikrant (talk) 08:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added note

You keep making the same edits, swapping out images, but never to improve the article, seemingly more just to make a point. If you have an issue with an article, you go to the article talk page and discuss it. - wolf 16:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to STOBAR. Materialscientist (talk) 08:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 08:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to edit [[Aircraft Catapult]], what should I do first? from Niwitz0vikrant Nimitz0vikrant (talk) 11:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why is Aircraft catapult not linked in your post? And why are you replying to an unrelated post 6 months later...? Also, why do you continue to make random changes to images when it doesn't seem necessary, or at least, not an improvement? And when reverted, why carry on with these edits, instead of discussing them, or perhaps moving on to something else? Have you read the 'welcome' template at the top of this page? Read through all the linked guidance it provides? Gone through the steps for new users? If not, why not? Also, have you read all the linked policies & guidelines in the various warnings, notices and revert messages you've received? (Again, if not, why not?) There is a learning curve here that some find kind of steep, and while you can't learn by trial and error alone, you should know that don't have to, help is available to you, anytime you need it, via the Help Desk, as well as through other means. - wolf 09:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Corvette did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.
Added note: With this edit, since you didn't include references, it's possible that you instead relied on information from other, related Wikipedia articles to update this page. If that is case, then per Wikipedia:Attribution, you should have noted which articles you relied on, and for which changes. If you didn't rely on another article(s) for information, then please source your changes per WP:RS & WP:CITE. Thank you - wolf 20:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing...

...continues to be problematic. You made several changes to the article Destroyer today, that seemed random, needless and left the page worse off than you found it. The object here should be to leave pages better than you found them. All to often, as is the case here, your edits are reverted. Look at your previous edit, to the Corvette page. Among other things, you again made multiple changes to images that were not needed, and for some reason you added numerous <nowiki/> tags, seemingly haphazardly and at random, to various sclass templates, where they were not at all needed.

If the majority of your edits are not improvements and lead to other editors having to spend time correcting them, that means your impact on this project is net-negative. Another issue here that you basically do not communicate, and one of the few times that you have, you were given advice on how to seek assistance to improve your editing, but I see no evidence that you've since done that. If you continue the way that you have, you could very likely end up blocked under the WP:CIR guidelines. I will again encourage you to read through the 'welcome' template at the top of this page, actually click on and read all the pages it contains and actually go through the steps for new users.

I would also strongly encourage to stop editing articles for now, and instead post any changes you would like to see made to the article talk page. That way, you get gain valuable feed-back from experienced editors on just what changes will work as well as what changes won't and why not. (This was also suggested to you about 5 months ago.)

And as always, if you need assistance, you can contact the Help Desk anytime. - wolf 23:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nimitz0vikrant&oldid=1185999410"