Talk:José Antonio Balseiro

Biography: Science and Academia Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

‹See TfM›

Physics Stub‑class

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please read this before editing the article

Recent vandalism in this article has been unstoppable, please discuss changes here before editing the article. All edits with no consensus will be considered vandalism and removed without any advise. Thanks. --OneEuropeanHeart 22:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Physics

The following note is frequently added by an annonymous editor:

"Note that Balseiro's report against Richter (1952)[1] is unable to reasonably describe the optimum non controversial Muon-catalyzed fusion temperature as described in Rafelski, et.al. "Cold Nuclear Fusion". Scientific American, 257, 1987, p. 84. Those authors reported an experimentally measured optimum reaction temperature near 900ºC."

This is a misunderstanding. The physics when using muons is different than when only normal electrons are present, so that muon catalyzed fusion needs to be adressed differently. Because muons where NOT present in Richter's experiment, Balseiro's calculations are correct.

Luzu 19:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I do not want to hurt your reputation. Balseiro's report has nothing to do with nuclear physics and was wisely not endorsed by Dr. Isnardi's report. --200.45.6.23 20:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify to what report you are refering and who is Isnardi. Balseiro's report is a response and a criticism of Richter's experiment, and if it has nothing to do with Nuclear Physics it is because Richter's ideas do not apply to Nuclear Physics either. Luzu 12:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.ancefn.org.ar/institucional/presidentes/isnardi.htm --200.45.6.216 14:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, following with Balseiro's tradition to make a career by blaming other people's ideas, you endorsed that I'm vandalizing wikipedia (which is not true)--200.45.6.216 14:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]