Talk:Charlotte Chapel (Edinburgh)

Proposal to rename page

The official history of this church makes it clear that the correct name is simply "Charlotte Chapel", but that its publicity material over the years included the word "Baptist" to avoid potential misunderstanding that it was an R.C. chapel. A new logo adopted in 2005 uses the term "Charlotte Chapel". I would therefore propose that the page be renamed using the shorter name. Kim Traynor | Talk 17:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Chapel (Edinburgh). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080223224451/http://www.charlottechapel.org:80/about/belief.php to http://www.charlottechapel.org/about/belief.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]