Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Morkcke (talk | contribs) at 18:16, 1 March 2024 (Requesting protection for Al-Balushi). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Increase protection as a result of suspected ban evasion of sock puppetry, see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/81.104.111.169. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 17:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's see what happens with the SPI. If all the socks get blocked, this problem may solve itself. Daniel Case (talk) 06:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism with a user removing negative information. 193.117.187.82 (talk) 12:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. A clear spillover from Ashfield Independents, which I had to ECP last week. Macaddct1984 was within their rights to keep taking it out under WP:3RRNO since you kept adding unsourced contentious material about a living person. This would have led to you getting blocked, but since you have now added what appear to be reliable sources to support those claims (something you really should have done from the get-go), we will see what happens next. I have given you a contentious topics alert for BLP, and strongly urge both of you to discuss this if you continue to have issues instead of edit warring.

I will also be putting a CTOPS notice on the talk pages of both these articles. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing edit dispute related to the Israel–Hamas war. Needs ARBPIA protection. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection - Changing IP keeps vandalizing page. GoodDay (talk) 02:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – all IP edits since January have been from what appears to be one person, who insists all their edits are "true" despite the lack of sourcing. WCQuidditch 02:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP disruptive editing. Biased agenda, edit-warring, etc. Jingiby (talk) 04:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits and unexplained sourced content removal by anon IPs and newcomers. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 04:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CT/A-A should be enforced if possible. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 05:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlachs

Article in question: Vlachs

Reason: the article in question is being entirely rewritten by two hungarian users, CritiKende and OrionNimrod.

These users are removing any and all mentions of the "contiunity theory" (i.e that Romanians lived above the Danube before hungarian arrival) and replacing it with the "Immigrant Theory" (that the Romanians came to modern day Romania only after Hungarian arrival). This is unacceptable and the entire article has been compromised, with over 54% of the entire thing being written by just them two without anyone elses input.

Multiple important details were outright removed like:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1208658409 (Vlachs traveling to Mount Athos in the 8th Century)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1198006497 (Removal of an entire paragraph about Volohoveni, who are thought to have been Romanians living in modern day Ukraine)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1182790311 (Entire paragraph about Proto-Romanian being spoken in the 6th century being removed)

These to just name a few, OrionNimrod is much the same, if not even worse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1182605334 (Entire section about Romanians in the 9th century being removed)

So on and so forth. This cannot be tolerated!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by YoursTrulyKor (talkcontribs)

I would say this is content dispute, and protection is not the dispute resolution avenue, this leaning decline. I will appreciate a second opinion.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Newly released video game with technical issues. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping editor who doesn't want to understand that navboxes are for existing articles. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I really don't know what's going on here. Persistent disruption and addition of unsourced content from multiple IPs. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper edit warring a result contradictory to match reports. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing genre edit war. Martinevans123 (talk) 08:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent, daily vandalism from one or more anon-IP since 10 March .  Stepho  talk  08:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from newly created vandal-only accounts. Hotwiki (talk) 08:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Nobody (talk) 09:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary Semi-Protection:

Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Fragrant Peony (talk) 09:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. A-I conflict. User3749 (talk) 11:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of disruption from LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of disruption from LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of disruption from LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. IP has been blocked and no further activity since February 20. The Night Watch (talk) 14:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of disruption from LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring since 02:16 1 March 2024. Panian513 13:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs from just one range. Persistent personal attacks as excuse for their unsourced claims. Seems to think that pictures are promo. The Banner talk 14:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a bad-faith, totally baseless request, made by someone who has reverted over and over again without any attempt at any point to explain why they are doing so. There is no vandalism; there are no personal attacks; "Seems to think that pictures are promo." is apparently some kind of hallucination. Read the edit. Study the diff. Then, ideally, block the person who has been deliberately harming the article by reverting for no reason. 185.104.136.59 (talk) 14:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I only ask for protection of the article. But your personal attacks can work as a boomerang. The Banner talk 14:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 14:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since 21:47 25 February 2024. Panian513 14:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Generalrelative (talk) 16:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. A variety of IP addresses keep adding the same level of edits, which have been amounting to complaints that movies that were promised for a certain day haven't been released yet. It has been different IP addresses making the same scope of edits, so warnings have done nothing. ZootyCutie (talk) 16:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of IP vandalism, he is the current president of Kenya so various constituents taking out their anger on the page. Sputink (talk) 16:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of false information from newly created vandal-only accounts. Hotwiki (talk) 17:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – weird additions by two editors. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 17:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Right now, I added all the information with sources from Arabic books and there are Arabs and non-Arabs so protection is required to prevent any other vandalism. Thank You Morkcke (talk) 18:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]