User talk:Firefly
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
FireflyBot
Hello, Firefly,
Every few weeks I check on FireflyBot to see if it is posting CSD G13 notices to draft/sandbox creators and it looks like it stopped doing so on September 3rd. Could you check on it to see if there are any problems and get it up and going again? Many thanks for all of the work you and your bot do. All the best, Liz Read! Talk! 19:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Liz sincere apologies for the delay here - this is now fixed. DreamRimmer has a BRFA to take up this task as well, which I think is good - we'll coordinate so that we can share this task and have some redundancy / reduce single points of failure. firefly ( t · c ) 14:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for restarting it. I have sent you a mail. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, Firefly,
- Yes, I just noticed that FireflyBot is back in action. Hooray! Thank you. But you are totally allowed to take a break from the project. Maybe you should share bot operator status with Dreamrimmer. I know that works well with HaleBot. Liz Read! Talk! 04:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Liz indeed, that is the plan! firefly ( t · c ) 14:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for restarting it. I have sent you a mail. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 12:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
– DreamRimmer (talk) 12:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review
Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
YGM
Hi, I have sent you an email and am waiting for your response. Thanks! – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
- Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
- An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
- Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).
Miscellaneous
- If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.
hallo Firefly, the lintertables has two new categories, but your tool dosent show them. It would be nice if you can expand the tool for special:LintErrors/duplicate-ids (high priority), the other one Special:LintErrors/night-mode-unaware-background-color is not that nessesary. Lómelinde (talk) 09:15, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- I oppose the addition of the Duplicate IDs category. It has too many unfixable false positives right now. It is also unclear whether the dark mode issues can or should be fixed in all cases. Please discuss at Wikipedia talk:Linter. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:20, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- This might be in en:wp, but in de:wp I do think we would manage most of the doubled ID problems (only coordinate ids would be a problem). My intention for the request is to update our statistic with reliable numbers, there is one Editor who calls us for lying because we do not yet put the numbers into the statistic see here. And I do not like to be called a liar. But the numbers in the specialpages are not valid (once they show 667.171 errors [same in both categories] at other times there are actualy 233.058 duplicate ids, so wich number of errors is correct?), only fireflytool shows usable (trustable) numbers of errors. I do not know how to get reliable numbers in any other way. For darkmode i agree, this is to much and too inprecise analised. But even there we managed to reduce the errores by several million. --Lómelinde (talk) 06:11, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Tamping Issue
FireFly can you help me restart the Hip Hop Movement article, Thank you Street sting (talk) 14:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)