Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Silver Movement
Appearance
- The Silver Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Seems to be a non-notable band with no significant coverage in the mainstream media. No indication of national or international tours, no chart hits. Polly (Parrot) 17:28, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
This artist has iTunes releases and is on an indie label. Just because they didn't chart or tour doesn't make them insignificant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Audiomixxer1123 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Just a promotional vanity page. No notability and nothing significant - no refs. Parkerparked (talk) 19:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:12, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Few independent ghits, I've found no evidence that it satisfies anything on WP:BAND. Getting distribution on iTunes is a step in the right direction, but not enough by itself. Matt Deres (talk) 00:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- This is totally wrong. So you are telling me that because this artist has just been VERY successful locally, it's not good enough. And because he has been featured MULTIPLE times on iTunes, it's not good enough. First of all to all at WikiPedia, get your facts straight. As a representative for The Silver Movement, I know more about them then any of you do. This page belongs here. Audiomixxer1123 (talk) 15:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Above comment sealed it for me. Representatives don't get to edit Wikipedia, that's a conflict of interest. Of course you think it belongs here if you're being paid in currency or in kind by them. Would also recommend blocking the SPA. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, doesn't appear to meet notability standards for a band. Nakon 17:23, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- By no means do I get paid by The Silver Movement. This band has been very successful. No wonder why no one uses WikiPedia. No one has a fair say in ANY content input.