User talk:170.170.59.138

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 170.170.59.138, is registered to Kinko's and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

May 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Luis Napoles (talk) 13:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Alex Jones (radio). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. We've gone through this before. He advocates conspiracy theories. Everything else is secondary. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:15, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Generation Jones. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:15, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Stock market bottom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your edits introduced markup errors; please use the preview button when making edits on Wikipedia Quaeler (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Minka (pornographic actress). However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 02:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Minka (pornographic actress). Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 03:22, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Minka (pornographic actress) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mm40 (talk) 01:59, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Fugitive slave laws has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Landon1980 (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pedro Zamora. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 12:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Tellurium-130. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 00:56, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The New Style (song). — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Tabercil (talk) 20:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. — Kralizec! (talk) 18:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: block duration: 55 hours

June 2009

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Chromium nitride worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you.—Tetracube (talk) 18:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tuning articles

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Please provide an actual edit summary actually "briefly describ[ing] the changes you have made", not one misleading word.

Also, see my questions at many article talk pages such as Talk:Quarter tone#Interval table: "Why are random intervals in the Interval size table shaded or darker than other intervals in the table?" Hyacinth (talk) 18:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Do not continue to add content to articles about living people without providing a reliable source as you have done several times to Paulo Szot. -- The Red Pen of Doom 19:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

All edits on Wikipedia that are not vandalism are assumed to be improvements. As such, one needs to provide more in an edit summary than "improvement" or "improved", such as what one improved and how, for example, "fixed spelling in intro sentence". Thanks, and happy editing. Hyacinth (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, 170.170.59.138. You have new messages at Talk:Vivek Kundra.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

September 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hawthorne (TV series), you will be blocked from editing. Cirt (talk) 03:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Hawthorne (TV series) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 05:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Hawthorne (TV series). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Cirt (talk) 05:03, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Killiondude (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Too Beautiful to Live, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Too Beautiful to Live was changed by 170.170.59.138 (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-09-29T16:15:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Too Beautiful to Live. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 16:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to T. R. Knight. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 00:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to United States Penitentiary, Atlanta. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Regards, Gaelen S.^Talk ^• ^Contribs 00:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Securities fraud. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Regards, Gaelen S.^Talk ^• ^Contribs 00:52, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Exponential growth. Regards, Gaelen S.^Talk ^• ^Contribs 00:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. The last 3 edits, changing Ponzi Scheme to Ponzi scheme, are all correct. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to BrowseControl has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 06:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to BrowseControl constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 06:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.