User talk:LTblb

.

April 2013

Your recent editing history at Catalan people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You are violating the 3RR. Please stop. Please go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution If I continue to see reverts I will go to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring and you may be blocked. Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 02:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Spain, you may be blocked from editing. Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 04:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, LTblb. You have new messages at Leujohn's talk page.
Message added 05:56, 12 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Reply

No one on wikipedia has the authority to remove comments that are not deemed alright. Please read this and see he doesn't violate any Wikipedia rules. Now the talk page isn't an appropriate place to discuss sock puppetry. There's a place for that. If he so chooses to file a complant their on you there's nothing you can do but defend your self (with words and not reverting edits) at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations. As of right, he has filed one. I have posted the alert below.

Now, please discuss your dispute with him on Talk:Spain like adults. Start a conversation. This is how wikipedia works. It is a community and discussions are necessary.-- Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 06:12, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a place for everyone. You can't erase other peoples comments unless it follows the guildlines I gave you a link on my last post here. Anyone can file a sock puppet case and he has. The only thing you can do is defend yourself using the links below. Please read this If you are deemed a sock puppet well you have violated wikipedia policy and will be block and if not move on and discuss this like adults.-- Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 06:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LTblb, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 06:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Antoni Gaudí, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Antoni Gaudí. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 20:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I was going to leave you a final warning regarding your edit-warring. However, as you have just been warned by another editor, I shall leave it at that. Please do not revert my edit at the Spain article without first having reached consensus on the talk page. Thank you. --Technopat (talk) 21:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]