Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isa ali pantami

Isa ali pantami

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self promotional article... inappropriate as per WP:COI and WP:RESUME Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. I am quite surprised my Speedy tag was removed. It's obviously self promotion with no evidence for notability. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't need to have evidence for notability to pass CSD-A7, just any assertion of significance which is in any way plausible. In this case a number of claims for significance have been made, some of which are marginally credible. Deletion for lack of notability is a higher standard than speedy deletion, requires some discussion and is more final than can be achieved through speedy deletion.Catfish Jim and the soapdish 20:27, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: blatantly promotional article. Wikipedia is not a CV database. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 23:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]