Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by L235 (talk | contribs) at 00:23, 1 January 2021 (+2021, -2015). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is the central log for all sanctions issued to enforce an arbitration decision or as a discretionary sanction.

20212020201920182017201620152014201320122011201020092008200720062005

Search for a sanction
Enter a username into this box to check if they have been sanctioned. You can also search for an enforcing administrator or for a specific sanction.


2021

  • Also removed 1RR sanction from these pages, just leaving the BRD sanction

Log of individual sanctions

Log of page-level restrictions

General sanctions/India–Pakistan conflict (defunct)
Satinder Sartaaj is semi-protected for 1 month--Ymblanter (talk) 09:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NomanPK44 is partially blocked from the Insurgency in Balochistan article (only) for 2 weeks due to a 1RR violation. El_C 18:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bhaskarbhagawati is blocked for 48 hours due to a topic ban violation. El_C 15:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nadar (caste) is indefinitely EC protected due to long-term disruptive editing by new users not familiar with our sourcing standards. EdJohnston (talk) 03:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ihaveabandonedmychild is indefinitely topic banned from editing anything about Vanniyar or biographies that may be connected to Vanniyar, broadly construed. —SpacemanSpiff 09:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nazim Hussain Pak is topic banned from editing geography-related articles associated with India/Pakistan/Afghanistan; they may appeal after six months. 331dot (talk) 09:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
2020–2021 Indian farmers' protest — protection upgraded to ECP, extended for 6 months. El_C 13:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
2020 Indian agriculture acts — straight to 6-month ECP, same as above. El_C 13:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Casperti is now subject to an indefinite IPA topic ban, broadly construed. The previous 6-month ban I imposed in 2020 didn't work. El_C 04:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Arbitration appeal declined, following a discussion at WP:AE--Ymblanter (talk) 22:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Administrative units of Pakistan indefinite ECP. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite EC protection for Karan (caste) and Khandayat (caste), following a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 19:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Krao212 is subject to an indefinite IPA topic ban, broadly construed, diff. Johnuniq (talk) 07:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rtr315 is blocked for 72 hours after multiple warnings to avoid CIRCULAR referencing (expressly so) were ignored. Note: new user. El_C 18:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indeffed as a normal admin action, since the same problem continues, with violations which are seemingly a product of an impenetrable IDHT approach. El_C 16:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Adinew56 is subject to a 3-month IPA topic ban. El_C 06:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bania (caste) is ECP protected for 3 months. signed, Rosguill talk 15:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Narendra Modi indef semi upgraded to ECP. El_C 11:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Adam's Bridge indef semi upgraded to ECP. El_C 18:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh straight to indef ECP (over 25 protections!). El_C 11:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Upgraded protection to full protection for ongoing disruption via edit warring [29]. Will remove full protection in three days, restoring prior indefinite ECP protection. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sanatan Sanstha indef semi (note: long-term socking spanning years). El_C 16:55, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Anti-Hindu sentiment indef semi. El_C 02:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kallar (caste) – I have upgraded the indef semiprotection to WP:ECP. EdJohnston (talk) 02:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bengali Kayastha – Indef WP:ECP. Long term edit warring, apparent caste promotion. EdJohnston (talk) 21:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rajakarthipillai has been indefinitely blocked for violating their topic ban. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Burningfire22 partially blocked from 2020 Delhi riots for 24 hours. While this may have been a 3RR block, I noted the 1RR in the block log. —C.Fred (talk) 15:38, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Indian Rebellion of 1857 indef semi. El_C 16:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Love Jihad indef semi up'd to ECP. El_C 13:27, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
B. R. Ambedkar – Indefinitely EC protected due to disruptive editing and frequent sockpuppetry. EdJohnston (talk) 04:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes – Indefinitely EC protected. EdJohnston (talk) 16:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sonia Gandhi indef semi. El_C 10:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Slake000 is topic-banned from editing content related to Bengali-Assamese languages, broadly construed, for 1 month. signed, Rosguill talk 18:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for one week for violating the tban, ban timer reset for the ban, now expiring 1 month from today's date. signed, Rosguill talk 03:39, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tabrez Ansari lynching one-year semi. El_C 12:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Eatcha topic-banned from India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan for one month. AE: [30] Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Union Council of Ministers indef semi. El_C 12:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lok Janshakti Party indef semi. El_C 23:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Statue of Unity indef semi. El_C 16:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Olden Creed indef topic-ban from India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Doug Weller talk 18:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna indef semi. El_C 01:53, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Manish9893 is subject to an indefinite IPA topic ban, broadly construed, diff. Johnuniq (talk) 09:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kashmir Premier League (Pakistan) indef semi. El_C 03:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Afghanistan indef ECP. El_C 13:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fall of Kabul (2021) indef semi. El_C 00:43, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Shakespeare143 is subject to an indefinite IPA topic ban, broadly construed, diff. Johnuniq (talk) 23:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
List of nicknames used for Narendra Modi indef semi. El_C 16:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Afghan Women's Network indef ECP. Doug Weller talk 10:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Panjshir resistance indef ECP. Anarchyte (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Panjshir conflict indef semi. El_C 19:55, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Badri 313 Battalion 6-month semi. El_C 03:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gupta Ynr is subject to an indefinite IPA topic ban, broadly construed, diff. Johnuniq (talk) 07:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Islamic Republic of Afghanistan indef semi. El_C 01:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lok Sabha indef semi. El_C 11:26, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Indo-Pakistani War of 1947–1948 indef semi. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Haqqani network one-year semi. El_C 15:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
2021 Taliban offensive indef semi. El_C 22:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
West Bengal Legislative Assembly indef semi. El_C 12:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan ECP indef. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bengali Brahmins EC protected indef. EdJohnston (talk) 14:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
2021 anti-Pakistan protests 6-month semi. El_C 14:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Arjun (tank) straight to indef ECP. El_C 17:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Abdul Qadeer Khan indef semi. El_C 14:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All India Trinamool Congress indef semi. El_C 12:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jadidjw blocked for 72 hours for edit warring on Hazaras. Diff EvergreenFir (talk) 06:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Now for 2 weeks for continuation of that same edit warring on Hazaras. Diff EvergreenFir (talk) 19:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Echo1Charlie istopic banned from discussing or editing anything related to India-Pakistan, broadly construed, for a period of 90 days. [31] Dennis Brown - 01:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Vishnu s madhav blocked for 72 hours for POV (nationalist?) content removal and misleading edit summaries. Warned, blocked. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bipin Rawat is EC protected two months due to caste-related warring, as reported at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pashto is indef EC protected. EdJohnston (talk) 02:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Cipher21 is warned against BATTLEGROUND/CIR in the topic area (ANI permalink). El_C 12:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okhajeyha blocked 31 hours for disruptive editing.--RegentsPark (comment) 14:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mclarenfan17 (no edits since June) has been editing while logged out, in contravention of their interaction ban with Tvx1. As such, per Tvx1's AE complaint, the sanction is reaffirmed, directing admins to block any IPs belonging to Mclarenfan17 with immediate effect, at least until some form of communication is established. Added Feb 25: archive link to 7 Feb AE complaint and permanent link to Feb 12 one. As well, permanent link to discussion on my talk page with Mclarenfan17/IP, last comment Feb 24. El_C 09:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Feb 18 developments collapsed. El_C 16:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
:*{{Noting that an IP identifying as Mclarenfan17 did engage in some limited discussion on my talk page, but it has since fizzled out, with evasion continuing (on ranges that would result in too much collateral if blocked). As such, semiprotection seems like the way to go here, with an indefinite semi just applied by me to 2021 World Rally Championship, with other related pages likely to follow. El_C 19:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]
Feb 24 developments collapsed. El_C 16:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
*{{{New small protection batch: 2021 Supercars Championship, 2021 Super2 Series, 2022 Supercars Championship, (same as above).}} El_C 11:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{Also noting that Mclarenfan17/IP keeps showing up on my talk page to post lengthy comments, as of yesterday on Feb 24 (permanent link), partially to violate their IBAN by speaking against their opponent, but also to make strange claims about how it would take them 6 weeks to get a registered account approved (is that even a thing?), which they feel isn't fair and so on. Meanwhile, they continue to edit the topic area via IP hopping on still too wide a range to block, as of Feb 23 (diffdiff), even though they know they shouldn't (I expressly told them so, repeatedly). So, not much confidence on that front (that we can end this whole whack-a-mole), unfortunately. Oh well. Sorry for the length of this! El_C 11:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]
  • El C, discretionary sanctions are not authorized for this case, so these protections should not be labeled as AE actions, but regular admin actions. The only thing that needs to be logged here is the block of Mclarenfan17 for violating the IBAN remedy. – bradv🍁 13:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Bradv, ah, understood. Thanks, will keep that in mind moving forward (duly collapsed). El_C 14:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • As there's no AE in this area, I've removed protection from most and any that looked possibly contentious (e.g. as though the protection was doing something (i.e. current seasons)), I added an expiry date of 1 January 2022, after which we can see if it is still necessary. Anarchyte (talk) 15:28, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protections


2020

  • Despite the violation having occurred, due to some extenuating circumstances (pertaining to self-revert mistiming), I have decided to unblock the user. El_C 03:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following is added as a remedy to the Antisemitism in Poland arbitration case: 7) 500/30 restriction: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. This prohibition may be enforced preemptively by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP), or by other methods such as reverts, pending changes protection, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 rule are not considered edit warring.

    • Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by the methods mentioned above.
    • Standard discretionary sanctions as authorized by the Eastern Europe arbitration case remain in effect for this topic area.

Passed 6 to 0 by motion at 19:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

For the arbitration committee, Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 20:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Expand for 1 June 2020 batch implementing general prohibition
Note I have been working with people in the topic area to batch these, so if there are duplicates from above, apologies. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
+ECP --slakrtalk / 10:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for a week for tban violation. stwalkerster (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for one month for tban violation, following reminder of tban within past 24 hours. Nick (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mariupol Semi protected for three months. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:52, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Log of blocks and bans

Log any block, ban or extension under any remedy here. Minimum information includes name of administrator, date and time, what was done and the basis for doing it.

Log of page level sanctions

  • It has been brought to my attention that, per ACDS#Awareness#4, the awareness criteria were in fact satisfied. So it should be reflected in the log here, even if I'm not inclined to reinstate the block myself at this time (another admin is free to do so, however). El_C 21:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protections

This sanction was unsuccessfully appealed to the Arbitration Committee at 19:28, 2 December 2020 (UTC). Further substantive review at any forum is barred, see here (important note #2) for more information. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:28, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous decisions

Use this section to record the enforcement of ArbCom decisions not made as part of a case. For example, unblock conditions where the editor wasn't banned in a case.


2019

Atsme's topic ban from post-WWII Anti fascism in the United States is provisionally lifted for a period of twelve months. If at any point before 1 January 2023 an uninvolved administrator feels that Atsme is not able to edit productively in this area, they may re-impose the topic ban.

Note the discretionary sanctions for the Balkans were merged into those for Eastern Europe on 17 February 2019. Enforcement actions relating to this topic area after that date are logged at #Eastern Europe.

Extended confirmed protections

  • Both SashiRolls and Tryptofish are subject to an indefinite IBAN. El_C 01:58, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Tryptofish is no longer subject to the previous two-way IBAN. The sanction is modified so that SashiRolls is subject to a one-way IBAN with Tryptofish per AE appeal [141]. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:50, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • The previous "automatic article ban" sanction is replaced by the following: SashiRolls is subject to a standard interaction ban with regards to Tryptofish. At this time, such sanction will remain one-way per the previous AE appeal. Also, SashiRolls is topic banned from the subject of genetically modified organisms and agricultural biotechnology, broadly construed. AE request: [142] Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pages

  • Now that the Oct. 30 deadline has passed, I've reduced protection to autoconfirmed to some articles, while to others, the protection lapsed automatically. El_C 15:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Log of blocks and bans

Log any block, ban or extension under any remedy here. Minimum information includes name of administrator, date and time, what was done and the basis for doing it.

Log of page level sanctions

Extended confirmed protections

Zionist Freedom Alliance Doug Weller talk

Miscellaneous decisions

Use this section to record the enforcement of ArbCom decisions not made as part of a case. For example, unblock conditions where the editor wasn't banned in a case.


2018

  • Andrevan is topic banned for three months from edits about, and all pages related to, post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, broadly construed. The only exception to this is commenting at any potential ArbCom case or case request in which they are a named party. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
List of articles on which I replaced the templates

Talk:Roy Moore Talk:Donna Brazile Talk:Debbie Wasserman Schultz Talk:Myron Ebell Talk:Melania Trump Talk:Jill Stein Talk:Andrew Napolitano Talk:Mike Pence Talk:Tim Kaine Talk:Jeff Sessions Talk:Ted Cruz Talk:Clinton Foundation Talk:Betsy DeVos Talk:Ivanka Trump Talk:Kellyanne Conway Talk:Frank Gaffney Talk:Jared Kushner Talk:Van Jones Talk:Neil Gorsuch Talk:National Policy Institute Talk:Michael Flynn Talk:David Malpass Talk:Mick Mulvaney Talk:Breitbart News Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos Talk:2016 Democratic National Convention Talk:2016 Republican National Convention Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016 Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 Talk:Kelli Ward Talk:Steve Bannon Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016 Talk:List of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 Talk:United States presidential election, 2020 Talk:Results of the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 Talk:Results of the Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016 Talk:Political positions of Donald Trump Talk:List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 Talk:Tim Canova Talk:Protests against Donald Trump Talk:Stop Trump movement Talk:Deep state in the United States Talk:Legal affairs of Donald Trump Talk:Clinton Foundation–State Department controversy User:K.e.coffman/Sandbox/Conspiracy Talk:Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump Talk:First 100 days of Donald Trump's presidency Talk:Foreign policy of Donald Trump Portal talk:Current events/2016 November 9 Portal talk:Current events/2016 November 10 Portal talk:Current events/2016 November 11 Portal talk:Current events/2016 November 12 Portal talk:Current events/2016 November 13 Portal talk:Current events/2016 November 14 Portal talk:Current events/2016 November 15 Portal talk:Current events/2016 November 16 Talk:Family of Donald Trump Talk:Sean Spicer Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2020 Talk:List of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign political endorsements, 2016 Talk:List of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign non-political endorsements, 2016 Talk:Fake news websites in the United States Talk:Trump–Russia dossier Talk:Efforts to impeach Donald Trump Talk:Business projects of Donald Trump in Russia Talk:List of executive actions by Donald Trump Talk:CREW v. Trump Talk:Social policy of Donald Trump Talk:Immigration policy of Donald Trump Talk:Executive Order 13769 Talk:List of lawsuits involving Donald Trump Talk:President Trump's immigration bans Talk:Aziz v. Trump Talk:Tootkaboni v. Trump Talk:Doe v. Trump Talk:Executive Order 13767 Talk:Legal challenges to the Trump travel ban Talk:Dismissal of Sally Yates Talk:Reactions to Executive Order 13769 Talk:Executive Order 13768 Talk:Cannabis policy of the Donald Trump administration Talk:Marijuana policy of the Donald Trump administration Talk:Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement Talk:Executive Order 13780 Talk:Open space accessibility in California Talk:Trump Tower wiretapping allegations Talk:Environmental policy of the Donald Trump administration Talk:2017 dismissal of U.S. attorneys Talk:Foreign policy of the Donald Trump administration Talk:LGBT protests against Donald Trump Talk:Gays for Trump Talk:United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement Talk:D.C. and Maryland v. Trump Talk:Blumenthal v. Trump Talk:Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump Talk:Stone v. Trump Template:Editnotices/Group/Talk:Roy Moore Talk:List of proclamations by Donald Trump Talk:CNN v. Trump

~Awilley (talk) 02:39, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The following list of articles have talk page sanctions templates and edit notices with the 1RR and Consensus-required restrictions, but I could not find corresponding entries in this log (searched back to 2015). I am assuming the administrators who placed the sanctions and created the edit notice templates simply forgot to make a log entry here. (Easy to forget, done it myself.) I am linking the pages here for reference, along with the name of the admin who created the edit notice.
~Awilley (talk) 17:13, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~Awilley (talk) 01:40, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Discretionary sanctions (1RR and Consensus Required) are removed from the following 26 pages. Sanctions were originally placed by User:Coffee (now retired). These pages for the most part have low edit volume and no recent disputes.
Note that this is allowed per Special:Permalink/873620431#Amendment to the standard provision for appeals and modifications ~Awilley (talk) 20:50, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ryan Zinke is placed under 1RR and consensus required. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Discretionary sanctions have been lightened on 53 articles originally sanctioned by User:Coffee. The rule known as "Consensus required" has been replaced by an original rule called "Enforced BRD". The current text of the new rule is as follows: Enforced BRD: If an edit you make is challenged by reversion you must discuss the issue on the article talk page and wait 24 hours (from the time of the original edit) before reinstating your edit. Partial reverts/reinstatements that reasonably address objections of other editors are preferable to wholesale reverts." This sanction is in addition to the WP:1RR already in place on the articles. Articles affected by this change are:
Note that because this is a new sanction that has never been used before I will be closely monitoring the above articles and will modify/remove the sanction or replace consensus required to articles if I see that things aren't working. ~Awilley (talk) 02:05, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blocked indefinitely (first year under discretionary sanctions) for violating editing restrictions. Any topic ban appeal may now not be launched sooner than one year after any unblock occurs. [193] --NeilN talk to me 20:42, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Users

Pages

  • not to personalize disputes or to use inflammatory language ("comment on the content, not the contributor");
  • not to impede the formation of consensus by being too bold with talk page actions (specifically, they should not take it upon themselves to maintain or "clerk" any discussions);
  • not to impede the formation of consensus by repeatedly making the same points;
  • to acknowledge consensus can change and having external events bring increased scrutiny and change to potential walled gardens of articles can be beneficial and should not be ridiculed. [217] --NeilN talk to me 23:46, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Topic ban changed to following restrictions: 1) Not remove any WP:G5 tags from WP:ARBIPA articles 2) Observe WP:1RR with autoconfirmed editors on WP:ARBIPA topics 3) Ensure the sources he's using fully and accurately back up the content he's proposing. He will be required to produce the necessary excerpts from sources if challenged by an experienced editor 4) Take care not to misrepresent the validity or reliability of a source. Failure to abide by any one or more of these conditions may result in an immediate topic ban or block. [221] --NeilN talk to me 01:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restrictions reduced to not removing any WP:G5 tags from WP:ARBIPA articles for remainder of sanctions (six months from original change). --NeilN talk to me 16:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Amended / clarified as applying to intersectional articles only. Guy (Help!) 23:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User was blocked for one month, on 2018-02-06. This was initially a longer block, but discussion at WP:ANI (currently, here) showed a consensus to shorten the block. The 1 year topic ban restarts on completion of the block and thus, ends on 2019-03-06. --Yamla (talk) 20:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Article/topic level restrictions

Extended confirmed protections

Miscellaneous decisions

Use this section to record the enforcement of ArbCom decisions not made as part of a case. For example, unblock conditions where the editor wasn't banned in a case.


2017

Edit: modified to apply to apply to just the Russian interference article for three days. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Holanthony (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from editing in the BLP topic area, specifically "any edit in any article with biographical content relating to living or recently deceased people, or any edit relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles of any page in any namespace". [280] BethNaught (talk) 14:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article/topic level restrictions

Gilgit-Baltistan: 1RR restriction imposed by User:El C[295]. --regentspark (comment) 17:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jangg8962 (talk · contribs) is blocked blocked one week for lame name order changes specifically warned against - "All edits that consist merely of changing around the order of mentioning the two countries ("Japanese-Korean" vs. "Korean-Japanese", etc.), or edits that mess with the naming of "Japan Sea"/"East Sea", "Liancourt Rocks"/"Dokdo", etc., are strictly forbidden, unless they have been discussed and reached consensus in advance." --NeilN talk to me 11:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protections

- Samsara 01:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
EC protection and 1RR edit notices have been removed from Lebanon per consensus at WP:AN (see diff). ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


2016

User blocked for trolling and violating topic ban. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DavidThomson1997 has been blocked indefinitely for violating the topic ban by editing the article about one of the war's catalysts. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Darkfrog24 is indefinitely topic banned from articles, discussions, and guidelines, explicitly including the manual of style, related to quotation marks and quotation styles, broadly interpreted. They may use quotes and quotation marks, and edit pages that include them, subject to normal editing rules (e.g. regarding edit warring). This ban may be appealed no sooner than 6 months after it is placed. Thryduulf (talk) 14:58, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • That topic ban replaced with: Darkfrog24 is indefinitely topic banned from the manual of style, and manual of style-related topics, specifically including quotation marks and quotation styles. This applies on all pages, including his and other's user talk pages. This may be appealed no sooner than 12 months from today (4 February 2016). Thryduulf (talk) 13:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Page-level sanctions
An appeal to this sanction was declined at WP:AE per this discussion. Dennis Brown - 10:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
MarkBernstein was blocked for 1 week for violating the discretionary sanction. Mike VTalk 00:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for 6 weeks for another breech of that topic ban. Courcelles (talk) 21:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for 6 months for third violation of topic ban. The WordsmithTalk to me 04:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked indefinitely for violating the topic ban. Salvio Let's talk about it! 19:20, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinitely blocked after obviously intentional breach of sanctions. Acroterion (talk) 11:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Page-level sanctions
  • David Tornheim is topic banned from the topic of genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed.
  • David Tornheim's topic ban from topic of genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed is reduced to be a topic-ban from glyphosate, broadly construed. David Tornheim is further warned that any disruption in the GMO topic area after this appeal will likely result in additional sanctions, including but not limited to the restoration of the original topic ban as a new sanction. Based on appeal at AE: [347]. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • EllenCT is indefinitely prohibited from discussing the potential motivations of Wikipedia editors, as well as the actions of corporations or persons related to genetically modified organisms, agricultural biotechnology and agricultural chemicals, broadly construed.
  • Jusdafax is warned that making future accusations not supported by evidence is likely to lead to sanctions. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]