The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
A fact from Tholos (architecture) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 September 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that in Greek architecture the round tholos form (example pictured) offered an escape from the "austere conventions" of Greek temple design?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that in Greek architecture the round tholos form (example pictured) offered an escape from the "austere conventions" of Greek temple design? Source: Lawrence, A. W., Greek Architecture, 1957, Penguin, Pelican history of art, p. 187: "their more or less secular functions gave partial exemption from the austere conventions that governed the design of temples".
Overall: Unless I am missing something (which is possible), it seems that the article does not meet the 5x expansion threshold, comparing this diff (616 words, 3,478 characters) with the current article (1,797 words, 10,427 characters). Without meeting this, it does not qualify for DYK. I would suggest expanding the article because it would make a good addition to DYK. Ergo Sum02:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, now: Prose size: 2972 words, 17754 characters, which is x5 (for the characters). Very sorry for the delay! New hook possibilities have opened up, or should we just get it underway. Johnbod (talk) 22:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unless I am missing something (which is possible), it seems that the article does not meet the 5x expansion threshold, comparing this diff (616 words, 3,478 characters) with the current article (1,797 words, 10,427 characters). Without meeting this, it does not qualify for DYK. I would suggest expanding the article because it would make a good addition to DYK. Ergo Sum 02:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Up to you whether you want to add an alt hook, but the current one is good to go. Ergo Sum 17:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
