Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaagneshwaran Ganesh

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete via CSD by User:Deb as created in violation of a previous block or ban. - Bilby (talk) 02:59, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yaagneshwaran Ganesh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No Significant coverage about this person that addresses the topic directly and in details. All of sources are either passing mentions or press release or primary (written by the subject). Fails WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR. Also this is a paid article (see author userpage). আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and trimThe article contains eight references. Among them two are editorial articles. Here are the links "BusinessWorld" and "The week". These two are Wikipedia approved, I believe. Simplewikipedian (talk) 18:07, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your opinion but it is a paid article, created by you. I think you have WP:COI here. Anyway, There is no secondary sources. All of article sources are primary (probably paid news, nothing substantial, mostly an interview masquerading as an article). Also they aren't WP:RS --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:22, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

আফতাবুজ্জামান it does appear that Simplewikipedian has a WP:PAID disclosure for this article on their user page for this article, but they also failed to follow COI policy because this was created directly into the main space and was not submitted as a draft for review. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Both appear to be PR or paid pieces. I cannot imagine an objective article would include lines such as "The ABM Conversations Podcast rightfully ranks in the top 1% of podcasts globally". Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.