Talk:Your Power: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:59, 16 August 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Your Power article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Your Power is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 5, 2022	Good article nominee	Listed
December 11, 2022	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 24, 2022.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that to protest against the overturning of Roe v. Wade, Billie Eilish performed a song that criticizes abusive men in power?

Current status: Featured article

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Billie Eilish Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Billie Eilish, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Billie Eilish on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Billie EilishWikipedia:WikiProject Billie EilishTemplate:WikiProject Billie EilishBillie Eilish articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Release dates

Under the above mentioned section, it is stated that the song was released in Italy on April 30, 2021 through UMG, but the cited source says it was released by EMI. Am I missing something? dxneo (talk) 10:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dxneo: EMI is owned by UMG. —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 12:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Cybertrip. However, here it clearly states that "Lunch" was sent to radio by UMG and not any of its subsidiaries. Why isn't UMG on the infobox if this was the case? Yes, it is the parent company but it does not take credit for everything. An artist can be signed to UMG for distribution and Sony for management. dxneo (talk) 05:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FAR notice

The article is not being properly maintained and there seem to be a number of issues. The release dates in some countries are not mentioned in the prose at all. The credits to the masterers and mixers also find no mention in the actual article text. The commercial performance section is outdated, for some reason only covering certifications "as of April 2024". Most certifications like Brazil, Denmark, France, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, and Spain find no mention in that section, which puzzlingly focuses on irrelevant one-week figures instead. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6wQnY3rib0 Entire performances] are completely missing a mention in the article. So it fails the featured article criteria 1b and 1c. As it stands, this will be moved to featured article review in a few weeks if things don't change substantially. N Ø 19:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 :{{re|Dxneo}} EMI is owned by UMG. [[User:Cybertrip|—<span style="background-color:#79db75; color:black">'''''cybertrip'''''👽</span>]] ( [[User talk:Cybertrip|💬]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cybertrip|📝]])  12:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 ::Okay {{U|Cybertrip}}. However, [https://radiodate.it/radio-date/billie-eilish-lunch-236650-17-05-2024-radiodate/ here] it clearly states that "[[Lunch (song)|Lunch]]" was sent to radio by UMG and not any of its subsidiaries. Why isn't UMG on the infobox if this was the case? Yes, it is the parent company but it does not take credit for everything. An artist can be signed to UMG for distribution and Sony for management. '''<span style="color:Purple">dxneo</span>''' ([[User talk:dxneo|talk]]) 05:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
+== FAR notice ==
+The article is not being properly maintained and there seem to be a number of issues. The release dates in some countries are not mentioned in the prose at all. The credits to the masterers and mixers also find no mention in the actual article text. The commercial performance section is outdated, for some reason only covering certifications "as of April 2024". Most certifications like Brazil, Denmark, France, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, and Spain find no mention in that section, which puzzlingly focuses on irrelevant one-week figures instead. <nowiki>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6wQnY3rib0 Entire performances]</nowiki> are completely missing a mention in the article. So it fails the featured article criteria 1b and 1c. As it stands, this will be moved to [[Wikipedia:FAR|featured article review]] in a few weeks if things don't change substantially. ''[[User:MaranoFan|<b style="color:purple">N</b>]][[User talk:MaranoFan|<b style="color:teal">Ø</b>]]'' 19:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)