Talk:Bayonetta

Video games: Nintendo / Sega Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

This article is supported by the Sega task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (2 participants)
Jackpot World (2 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Requested move 3 November 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 22:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bayonetta (series) → Bayonetta
Bayonetta → Bayonetta (video game)

– Per WP:NCVGDAB. Bayonetta is not substantially more important/notable than the 2nd game to the point where it would merit the top billing. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:14, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose as the series page right now is basically useless with only 2 released games (eg it should not exist and the details of the "series" can be on the first game's page). Once the 3rd game is out or closer to release, then there's more a reason to have a series page, and then the move reasons make sense, as I would otherwise agree that the first game is otherwise no special compared to the series. --Masem (t) 20:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support the series is fairly well known and has multiple confirmed entries. The series also as more details on crossover appearances, of which there are a few, and the anime film. With a third game confirmed, the series seems like it is going to stick around. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bayonetta 3 Article

If we were to give Bayonetta 3 its own article on Wikipedia, we should use what the developers have said about the game as a template. 31.203.82.97 (talk) 20:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The information about the game is not substantial enough for a separate article. Not yet. At best, it would be a stub, but I suggest adding more info to the section in the main series article first.--GimmeChoco44 (talk) 03:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move 23 September 2021

Now that Bayo 3 got a full on gameplay trailer, would now be the best time to split it into a separate page? Superhylia (talk) 02:06, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No release date (beyond a year) and no other details, so no. --Masem (t) 02:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since there is literally nothing to split regardless, I am removing the request as it makes no sense. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

under reception mention ongoing boycott of the 3rd game potentially?

Just a suggestion, if it doesn’t fit then don’t write it. 100.7.116.42 (talk) 22:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]