Talk:Domain authority

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 18 December 2015 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Domain Authority 2.0

Hi, there is recent chatter about an overhaul to Domain Authority. I came across an article from Moz, where it says version 2.0 is coming out. Web address: moz.com/blog/new-domain-authority
Now I understand 'version 2.0' is just for naming, however what puzzles me is they make a statement that Moz is the company responsible for the Domain Authority algorithm. No where else on the internet can I find where Domain Authority originated from. As a comparison, it appears PageRank originated from Google.
Can anyone shed any light on this? If this is the case, why isn't this mentioned on the Wikipedia page? It is important for people to know if Domain Authority is a metric created by a commercial company. (Iamthomas nine (talk) 02:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Domain Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160811063623/http://www.isynergymedia.net/ to https://www.isynergymedia.net

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I set the sourcheck true ScienceGuard (talk) 04:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent vandalism/promo edits?

Nearly every day, it seems, someone tries to put a backlink into this article so search engines will see it. Granted, Pending Changes stops the promo edits from being seen by most users, but does it prevent search engines from seeing them? I'm going to try to find out, but thought I'd mention it here.

Regardless, though, there is enough disruptive promo editing going on that I'm thinking about requesting semi-protection (confirmed users only), to keep from wasting pending-changes reviewers' time. Thoughts, anyone? — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 16:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@UncleBubba: You're right, I think a semi-protection request is a good idea. Since your post here, two more backlink additions have been reverted. —Bruce1ee^talk 11:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Request posted here: [1] (and here: [2], because I kinda overstated the frequency of occurrence). Let's see what happens. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 13:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]