Talk:Norris–La Guardia Act
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adair
[edit]The Supreme Court declared similar legislation unconstitutional in Adair v. United States. The article would benefit from an explanation of how this act survived judicial scrutiny.Bill (talk) 05:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 15 July 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Calidum 03:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Norris–La Guardia Act of 1932 → Norris–La Guardia Act – This is the WP:COMMONNAME (see, e.g., the GScholar results, almost all of which omit the year), and there are no other Norris–La Guardia Acts with which this one might be confused. This appears to be our ordinary practice for unambiguous titles: see, e.g., Volstead Act, Lloyd–La Follette Act, and Adamson Act. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom; specifically per the lack of need for disambiguation and the comparison to other article titles. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 22:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class organized labour articles
- Mid-importance organized labour articles
- WikiProject Organized Labour articles