Jump to content

User:Engineering Guy/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
All rated articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low ??? Total
FA 1,577 2,504 2,418 1,960 181 8,640
FL 181 688 768 702 100 2,439
A 371 681 788 584 91 2,515
GA 3,247 7,385 14,818 19,729 1,761 46,940
B 17,003 32,992 54,690 69,896 23,525 198,106
C 17,003 54,382 136,154 313,446 92,616 613,601
Start 18,537 92,538 417,331 1,633,967 414,222 2,576,595
Stub 4,278 31,449 277,914 2,808,988 762,910 3,885,539
List 4,898 17,262 54,198 196,221 69,746 342,325
Assessed 67,095 239,881 959,079 5,045,493 1,365,152 7,676,700
Unassessed 123 482 1,239 17,016 406,090 424,950
Total 67,218 240,363 960,318 5,062,509 1,771,242 8,101,650

Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering - Past years' statistics

[edit]

The total number of candidates appearing in GATE (across all subjects) increased till 2013. In 2014, it decreased slightly.

Total number of candidates appearing in GATE
Year Number of candidates appearing
2014
889,156
2013
984,855
2012
686,614
2011
553,000
2010
414,000
2009
230,000
2008
180,000
Year Total number of candidates appearing Reference(s)
2014 889,156 [1]
2013 984,855 [2]
2012 686,614 [3]
2011 Approximately 553,000 *
2010 Approximately 414,000 *
2009 Approximately 230,000 * [4]
2008 Approximately 170,000 to 180,000 * [4][5]

* Precise figures unavailable right now.

The following line chart shows the variation of the number of candidates appeared in the top 5 subjects, since GATE 2010:

  Electronics and Communication Engineering (EC)
  Computer Science and Information Technology (CS)
  Mechanical Engineering (ME)
  Electrical Engineering (EE)
  Civil Engineering (CE)
  All other subjects

Some information about the winners of Indian general election, 2014

[edit]

Non-governmental organisations Association for Democratic Reforms and National Election Watch analysed the candidates' sworn affidavits submitted to the Election Commission of India, and presented the following and other details in their reports.[6]

Criminal background

[edit]

Case-wise distribution of the 542 winners in the Lok Sabha election, 2014.[7]

  With serious criminal cases (20.66%)
  With non-serious criminal cases (13.47%)
  Without any criminal cases (65.87%)

About one-third of all winners have at least one criminal case, with some having serious criminal cases.[8]

A candidate with criminal case(s) had 13% chance of winning the election, whereas a candidate with a clean record had only 5% chance of winning. (Here, chance of winning = ⁠No. of winners in the category/ Total no. of candidates in that category⁠.)[9]

Political party Total no. of winners No. of winners with criminal cases[10] Percentage of winners with criminal cases No. of winners with serious criminal cases*[11] Percentage of winners with serious criminal cases*
Bharatiya Janata Party 281 97 35% 61 22%
Indian National Congress 44 8 18% 3 7%
AIADMK 37 6 16% 3 8%
Shiv Sena 18 15 83% 8 44%
All India Trinamool Congress 34 7 21% 4 12%
Others 128 52 41% 33 26%
Total 542 185 34% 112 21%

* Criteria for "serious" criminal cases:[12]

  1. Offence for which maximum punishment is of 5 years or more.
  2. If an offence is non-bailable.
  3. If it is an electoral offence (for eg. IPC 171E or bribery).
  4. Offence related to loss to exchequer.
  5. Offences that are assault, murder, kidnap, rape related.
  6. Offences that are mentioned in Representation of the People Act (Section 8).
  7. Offences under Prevention of Corruption Act.
  8. Crimes against women.

Compared to the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, there is an increase of winners with criminal cases. In 2009, 158 (30%) of the 521 winners analysed had criminal cases, of which 77 (15%) had serious criminal cases.[13][14]

Financial background

[edit]

Asset-wise distribution of the 542 winners in the Lok Sabha election, 2014.[15]

  Assets > ₹ 100 million (24.35%)
  Assets between ₹ 50 million and ₹ 100 million (12.92%)
  Assets between ₹ 10 million and ₹ 50 million (44.46%)
  Assets < ₹ 10 million (18.27%)

Out of the 542 winners analysed, 443 (82%) are having assets of ₹ 10 million or more. In the 2009 Lok Sabha election, out of 521 winners analysed, 300 (58%) winners had assets of ₹ 10 million or more.[16]

The average assets per winner are ₹ 147 million (in 2009, this figure was ₹ 53.5 million). The average assets per candidate are ₹ 31.6 million.

Asset range No. of candidates No. of winners[17] Percentage of candidates that won
More than ₹ 100 million 450 132 29%
₹ 50 million to ₹ 100 million 320 70 22%
₹ 10 million to ₹ 50 million 1443 241 17%
Less than ₹ 10 million 6038 99 2%
Total 8251 542 7%
Political party No. of winners Average assets per winner[18]
Bharatiya Janata Party 281 ₹ 115.9 million
Indian National Congress 44 ₹ 167.1 million
AIADMK 37 ₹ 64.7 million
All India Trinamool Congress 34 ₹ 25.1 million
Others 146 ₹ 250.0 million
Total 542 ₹ 147.0 million

Other details

[edit]

Education-wise distribution of the 542 members in the 16th Lok Sabha.[19]

  Class 12 pass and below (23%)
  Graduate and above (75%)
  Other (2%)

Age-wise distribution of the 542 members in the 16th Lok Sabha.[20]

  25 to 50 years (37%)
  51 to 70 years (55%)
  71 years and older (8%)

Gender-wise distribution of the 542 members in the 16th Lok Sabha.[21]

  Male (89%)
  Female (11%)
Education Number of members[22]
Illiterate 1
Class 12 or below 126
Graduate or above 405
Age range Number of members[23]
15 to 50 years 203
51 to 70 years 298
71 years or older 41
Gender Number of members[24]
Female 62
Male 480

Wikipedia statistics

[edit]

Language editions

[edit]

Distribution of the 63,937,380 articles in different language editions (as of 12 November 2024)[25]

  English (10.8%)
  Cebuano (9.6%)
  German (4.6%)
  French (4.1%)
  Swedish (4.1%)
  Dutch (3.4%)
  Russian (3.1%)
  Spanish (3.1%)
  Italian (3%)
  Polish (2.6%)
  Other (51.6%)
Articles in the 20 largest language editions of Wikipedia
(as of 12 November 2024)[26]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

English 6,909,344
Cebuano 6,116,923
German 2,958,441
French 2,646,827
Swedish 2,597,441
Dutch 2,171,547
Russian 2,009,365
Spanish 1,989,148
Italian 1,890,801
Polish 1,634,357
Egyptian Arabic 1,625,500
Chinese 1,450,413
Japanese 1,436,819
Ukrainian 1,352,759
Vietnamese 1,294,297
Waray 1,266,605
Arabic 1,245,501
Portuguese 1,137,553
Persian 1,018,714
Catalan 762,934

Assessment of articles' quality and importance

[edit]

Quality-wise distribution of over 4.8 million articles and lists on the English Wikipedia, as of 27 February 2015[27]

  Featured articles (0.11%)
  Featured lists (0.04%)
  A class (0.03%)
  Good articles (0.48%)
  B class (2.05%)
  C class (3.98%)
  Start class (25.69%)
  Stub class (54.07%)
  Lists (3.49%)
  Unassessed (10.07%)

Importance-wise distribution of over 4.8 million articles and lists on the English Wikipedia, as of 27 February 2015[27]

  Top importance (0.91%)
  High importance (3.21%)
  Mid importance (12.31%)
  Low importance (49.24%)
  ??? (34.34%)
All rated articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low ??? Total
FA 1,577 2,504 2,418 1,960 181 8,640
FL 181 688 768 702 100 2,439
A 371 681 788 584 91 2,515
GA 3,247 7,385 14,818 19,729 1,761 46,940
B 17,003 32,992 54,690 69,896 23,525 198,106
C 17,003 54,382 136,154 313,446 92,616 613,601
Start 18,537 92,538 417,331 1,633,967 414,222 2,576,595
Stub 4,278 31,449 277,914 2,808,988 762,910 3,885,539
List 4,898 17,262 54,198 196,221 69,746 342,325
Assessed 67,095 239,881 959,079 5,045,493 1,365,152 7,676,700
Unassessed 123 482 1,239 17,016 406,090 424,950
Total 67,218 240,363 960,318 5,062,509 1,771,242 8,101,650
About this table
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
Top importance
High importance
Mid-importance
Low importance
???
  •   Featured articles
  •   Featured lists
  •   A-class articles
  •   Good articles
  •   B-class articles
  •   C-class articles
  •   Start-class articles
  •   Stub articles
  •   Lists
  •   Unassessed articles and lists

[Note: The table above (prepared by the Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team) is automatically updated, but the bar-chart and the two pie-charts are not auto-updated. In them, new data has to be entered by a Wikipedia editor (i.e. user).]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ http://gate.iitkgp.ac.in/gate2014/press_release.pdf
  2. ^ http://www.gate.iitb.ac.in/gate2013/gate-2013-result-statistics/
  3. ^ http://www.gate.iitb.ac.in/2k12/gate2012/pdffiles/pressrelease.pdf
  4. ^ a b http://www.hindu.com/2009/02/08/stories/2009020859860800.htm
  5. ^ http://www.thehindu.com/features/education/college-and-university/gate2013-to-get-tougher/article3828392.ece
  6. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  7. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  8. ^ http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/a-third-of-mps-have-criminal-cases-shiv-sena-tops-list-report-398609
  9. ^ http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Every-third-newly-elected-MP-has-criminal-background/articleshow/35306963.cms
  10. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  11. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  12. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  13. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  14. ^ http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Every-third-newly-elected-MP-has-criminal-background/articleshow/35306963.cms
  15. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  16. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  17. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  18. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  19. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  20. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  21. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  22. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  23. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  24. ^ http://loksabha.adrindia.org/lok-sabha/analysis-of-criminal-and-financial-background-details-of-winners
  25. ^ List of Wikipedias – Meta
  26. ^ "List of Wikipedias". Wikimedia Meta-Wiki. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
  27. ^ a b Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Statistics – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Engineering_Guy/sandbox&oldid=924425472"