User talk:Orderinchaos
User Page | Userboxes | Barnstars | Projects | Talk Page |
I used to be a daily obsessive here in an earlier phase of my life, but serving on non-profit committees, then work, then study took me away. I will be here more than I was, but primarily sticking with maintenance tasks, fixing my own old lists, and editing here and there on politics, local government and electoral geography when time permits. Orderinchaos 11:34, 7 May 2019 (UTC) |
spooky
[edit]seeing a long inactive ed return, trust you find it ok... JarrahTree 10:55, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Still pretty inactive (full time study is very demanding!) but intend to be doing a bit more than I was. Thanks :) Orderinchaos 11:23, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- title wrong - imho that is east guildford railway station - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Midland_line_at_Guildford_W_from_Market_St.jpg - any thoughts? JarrahTree 12:17, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- my bad - it has all the traits of e guildford - but the telltale roof of the training centre at rhs mid dismisses that - the crappy fences (which give sense of e guildford before the bike path put in on left have been since replaced - (i think) JarrahTree 12:48, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- you still exist? I thought it might have been a rumour :) JarrahTree 03:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah uni and internship has its own way of sapping time... Good to hear from you again btw :) Orderinchaos 03:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Good to know you are keeping busy, and to see a familiar name pop up. Regards, ~ cygnis insignis 03:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks and good to hear from you as well! Orderinchaos 04:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
AWB access
[edit]Hi, I saw you make this edit - but if you can edit that page, you must be an admin; and according to the last paragraph of Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage#Requesting access, admins have AWB as a standard part of the toolkit. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed, MusikBot II (talk · contribs) removed you on its very next run. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 06:53, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah sorry about that. It turns out that I misdiagnosed my problem as not having access to AWB when it was a non compliant password (< 10 characters) under new password rules. For some reason Wikipedia was still accepting it for a time, but AWB was throwing its hands up in the air. Orderinchaos 03:56, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit]Western Australia | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 1986 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:11, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you! :) Orderinchaos
Notice
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Chris.Sherlock/Letsbefiends unblock request. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies for the template, but AN and bureaucracy and whatnot. Anyway, wanted to let you know I moved it to AN. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:13, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- No apology needed - thanks for letting me know! Orderinchaos 03:54, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Category:Cairns has been nominated for discussion
[edit]Category:Cairns, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delia Lawrie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry Mills (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
[edit]Happy Birthday!
[edit]Merger discussion for City of Swan Hill
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing—City of Swan Hill—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jonathan O'Donnell (talk) 23:45, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
A Duncraig photo you uploaded ...
[edit]... has been removed from the article for being mislabelled, according to the anon editor. Also pinging Calistemon, who added it to the page a couple of months back. Graham87 14:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing that to my attention - it turns out the person is correct! The photo appears to be of a house / unit block in the next street to Trinity (have been able to verify on Google Street View, there's a prominent "17" in the photo and it turns out it's 17 Burragah Way). Not sure how I got that wrong at the time. Might be a good excuse for me to go out there and take the actual front entrance... Orderinchaos 19:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the fix. I'm no expert on the northern suburbs, would never have picked up on that, rarely venture north past the Swan. While you there, maybe you could find a good, representative image for the Duncraig article? Calistemon (talk) 12:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- Will go up there after my exams are over and see what I can get. Despite its massive size it's mostly a higher-than-average-income residential suburb. Orderinchaos 20:26, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the fix. I'm no expert on the northern suburbs, would never have picked up on that, rarely venture north past the Swan. While you there, maybe you could find a good, representative image for the Duncraig article? Calistemon (talk) 12:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Lowering the protection on Craig Kelly's page
[edit]Hi, could the protection on Craig Kelly (politician) please be lowered to Wikipedia:Pending changes? My understanding is that this would allow all people to make changes but would still maintain a level of protection against vandalism etc. for this controversial crossbencher. This kind of protection has been in use on other politicians' pages such as Joe Hockey's for years with success. Thank you for your consideration. --159.196.100.171 (talk) 07:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit]Six years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Hezbollah has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. It is a wonderful world (talk) 20:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to Meetup, 15 November 2024
[edit]Adelaide Meetup Next: 15 November 2024 Last: 6 March 2020 |
You are cordially invited to this meetup to:
- discuss the WikiCon Australia 2024 event to be held in Adelaide on 23 November 2024, which involves the setting up of a GLAM collaboration between Wikimedia Australia and the South Australian Museum, and, possibly later, other local GLAM institutions
- discuss means of recruitment/mentoring/training of new editors, and the possibility of holding more regular meetups in Adelaide.
- Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 11:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
[edit]Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,