User talk:Ziggy Sawdust

hi folks i'm ziggy sawdust i like to write about all sorts of cool stuff on the wikipedia internet website
this is my talk page just take it easy and have a great time ok

Repost of Template:BlockUsername

A tag has been placed on Template:BlockUsername requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. -- Trevj (talk) 10:38, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Universal Character Set characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diaeresis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to English wine cask units because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 03:34, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plustic Elder Sister, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vignette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Cannabis Laws

Hey Ziggi, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. However, your "improvement" to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World-cannabis-laws.png was unfortunately not helpful. While you are surely right that a red/bad-green/good color scheme feels most natural to most of us, it unfortunately makes the map unreadable for people with protanopia colorblindness. See for yourself on the colorblindness simulation website http://colorfilter.wickline.org/ I thus reverted the image to the previous version. Please don't take it personal, i am sure you did not mean to create inaccesibilities for colorblind persons. Cheers!-- ExpImp^talkcon 22:43, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh god I'm an asshole I'm sorry :( ZigSaw 00:28, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doggy woggy listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Doggy woggy. Since you had some involvement with the Doggy woggy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The ChampionMan 1234 09:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ziggy Sawdust. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two-Sixteen.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Two-Sixteen.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Xfd top

Template:Xfd top has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 15:54, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Asplode" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Asplode has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 26 § Asplode until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 23:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]