User talk:RangersRus

Draft:Shuah_Khan

1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors Done

Her works are cited by other kernel developers, as is evident from the articles in references.

2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique Done

She is known for creating kselftest AbdulRahim2002 (talk)

Salaar

In Salaar, Deccan Chronicle states "production cost of 'Salaar’ is just Rs 270 crore-plus including star and technicians fees besides making costs and VFX" which means it is not overall production cost. Other sources which are more reliable gives clear budget. SonaMani1 (talk) 13:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mensxp is not reliable and others either are outdated such as this [1]. Deccan Chronicle gives detail on rumors of budget. RangersRus (talk) 13:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How other sources can be rumors? They too are reliable. SonaMani1 (talk) 13:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since your account is 5 days old, take time to go through WP:RS policy. RangersRus (talk) 13:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

user:Saagaraludhaati

Please keep a eye on Saagaraludhaati's contributions, as he is doing inaccurate things in Mahesh Babu films articles. Thanks. Falimy (talk) 12:19, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hanu Man soundtrack

There is Draft:Hanu Man (soundtrack). Please add any content and move to mainspace. 103.161.55.188 (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why create a draft when there is already an article on the movie Hanu-Man where it can be added under the segment Music? I think you should add it there if any information mentioned in the draft that does not already exist on the article Hanu-Man itself and with reliable sources. RangersRus (talk) 16:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look that draft. It has many content with reliable sources, to have a separate article. 103.161.55.188 (talk) 16:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the draft is fine but it is questionable as to why this needs its own separate article. Why not add it under Music segment on page Hanu-Man? There are many movie soundtracks and they all are mentioned under Music segment on the movie's page. Go through Hanu-man Music segment and use the necessary information from your draft to be included here. RangersRus (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But there is separate soundtrack article for Hi Nanna (soundtrack), Jersey (soundtrack), Salaar: Part 1 – Ceasefire (soundtrack), Sita Ramam (soundtrack), etc. like them these too made. It has more information and can be added dubbed versions, dubbed versions can't be added in film's music section. That's why this needs and separate soundtrack article. Hopes you understand and moves to article. 103.161.55.188 (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks For Your Help!

Thank you for your help at Dunki (film) with enforcing a WP:NPOV. My contributions in correct citation formatting and vandalism were to help the new user with proper citation under the assumption that their edits were in good faith. I'll be watching that article for further vandalism. Sink Cat (talk) 22:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. If the editor continues, he will need to be reported to WP:ANI. Already multiple warnings were given. RangersRus (talk) 02:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Submitted ANI. RangersRus (talk) 03:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hanu-Man box office

Film grossed est. ₹350 crore at box office.[2] Could you please update it. 103.70.199.30 (talk) 16:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

నేను మార్పు చేసాను. Source is good. RangersRus (talk) 14:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also change in List of highest-grossing Indian films, List of highest-grossing Telugu films, List of highest-grossing superhero films, List of highest-grossing South Indian films, List of Telugu films of 2024, List of Indian films of 2024, List of highest-grossing Telugu films, and List of Telugu films of 2024. Cheers. 103.166.245.14 (talk) 17:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Remsense诉 04:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bastar: The Naxal Story, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mint. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inviting for AfC Reviewing

Hey, I hope you’re well. I noticed your votes on AfDs, and I appreciate that. You have good experience with Wikipedia’s guidelines, so I am inviting you to join the AfC reviewing process. There are currently over 2700 drafts pending, and I think editors like you can help us tackle the backlog. You can apply to become an AfC reviewer here. After approval from Primefac, you will need to turn on the AfC help script, which will allow you to accept, decline, or reject any draft pending for review. Lastly, don’t forget to read about the AfC Help Script guide. I hope you find this message well. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 11:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not get pinged for this message. I am grateful for invitation. I get one to two hrs of free time a day and sometimes none and that time goes by quick in reviewing AFDs and update to some pages. I will consider it once I am able to allot some extra time. I might need you to shadow me as mentor for first couple of reviews. I will read through reviewing process to understand what is expected from reviewer. Good wishes. RangersRus (talk) 20:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding deletion discussion on Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27) article

Hi,

The article Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27) has been proposed for deletion .

You may participate in the deletion discussion of this article.

Regards. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 19:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Hello, just letting you I think you forgot to sign your vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger (2007 film) (2nd nomination). Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. I added my signature. RangersRus (talk) 14:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kalki box office

The source mentions 84 million usd as the box office collection, which is 700 crores request for change of box office collection to 700 crore 2409:40F3:1018:4798:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 14:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is the source link? If it has claim by the makers then it is not reliable. If it is independent source, I need to see the link and study it before updating the boxoffice numbers. RangersRus (talk) 15:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please review the latest revision of the article. I think it's not correct. Charliehdb (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Charliehdb: please point me to what needs checked and I will look at it. RangersRus (talk) 17:58, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See this. Charliehdb (talk) 01:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's a template for that

Re this and similar edits at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiten Dharpure, might I recommend {{spa}}? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. I knew I was missing something. RangersRus (talk) 20:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vote

Please vote your response at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Keerthy Suresh. Charliehdb (talk) 15:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote your response at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makhna, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Villager and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loca (Honey Singh song). Charliehdb (talk) 12:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BB2

Hi @RangersRus, contributions The Hindustan Times article reported the figure based on the box office tracking portal Cinetrak. Is that reliable? Anoop Bhatia (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I did not notice cinetrak. Looks unreliable without any information on owners, employees. I will say unreliable but let me add it to ICTF post for others to have a say in it. If others also think its unreliable, please help me removing this source and the number it supports on other pages. RangersRus (talk) 13:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added topic to get response. If others consider the same, please help in removing the source and the number it supports on page List of highest-grossing South Indian films as well. RangersRus (talk) 13:40, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I too asked something like that Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Reliability of reliable sources using sacnilk as their source. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 13:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IC 814

Hi @RangersRus, twitter link shared as reference are that of the journalist themselves and their take on the movie. the said journalist are being quoted verbatim. news portals have covered half of the tweets or just a few tweets without followups. for example Neelesh Mishra's 1st tweet was covered by news portals, but his followup tweet where he has clarified that he has not seen the series https://x.com/neeleshmisra/status/1830119252122354005. what should be the SOP in this case? Mavrick2022 (talk) 07:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the tweet was picked and covered by the news media reliable source, then the news source can be shown along with the tweet it mentions. Vir Sanghvi's tweet was covered by Firstpost news, and that is ok and in same way if you can find news media covering the tweet of Manak Gupta, then please use the media source. Neelesh tweet was covered by Firstpost also. It has to be secondary independent reliable source covering the tweet that they find noteworthy and not anything else. Tweet itself cannot be used as source. If news media thinks that a statement made is noteworthy then it is covered in their article and that is what needs to be shown on the page and not the statements made directly from the twitter source. RangersRus (talk) 13:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am aligned on this, but out of curiosity, when we are stating what a person said, why can't their own tweet be used a reference and a source of truth? their tweet is being used as verbatim, and not being extrapolated. In case of neelesh mehta, not including the 2nd statement changed the whole context to his first statement, since he made that statement even without watching the series Mavrick2022 (talk) 13:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tweets are personal social media accounts, considered self published and tweets that are not covered by reliable sources are likely to constitute undue weight. Maybe he did not see then but saw later. What news media found noteworthy to report from his tweet is whether the hijackers used false names such as Bhola, Shankar, Burger, Doctor and to this he found it true as covered by many independent reliable sources. RangersRus (talk) 14:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Greatest of All Time

Could you look at this revision. Is the sources mentioned reliable? Charliehdb (talk) 14:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Charliehdb: news9live is reliable as it is a channel of TV9 network. Others like Pinkvilla, IndiaToday, Indianexpress are all OK as well. These were the sources you had question on or did I miss anything? You can also ask in ictfsources talk page to get more views on news9live but I am pretty sure others will call it reliable too. RangersRus (talk) 14:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 15:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IndiaGlitz

Please continue purging it from articles. The only exceptions should be pre-2010 South Indian films articles as they don't have many sources. However, in Anniyan and Chandramukhi can you remove IndiaGlitz refs and still make the articles look coherent? Kailash29792 (talk) 09:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will look at those two pages. But there can not be any exceptions for any year articles when it comes to unreliable sources. I sympathize with you but I can not do so because of Wikipedia policy and guidelines. I have also seen arguments by other editors that so and so page has the same source so why not use it on this page or that page. I will continue to add citation needed tag where needed and editors can help in doing research to find reliable sources. RangersRus (talk) 11:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a great help to inform User:Kailash29792 before removing almost all of an article's sources like you did at Nepali (film). DareshMohan (talk) 16:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do add citation needed where necessary and editors are welcome to improve the article with reliable sources. If almost all the sources are unreliable, they will be removed but will be tagged with cn. RangersRus (talk) 17:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit on Anniyan. Now I need to find out how to rewrite sentences to match existing sources. DareshMohan is welcome to help. Kailash29792 (talk) 19:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite thanks to you!

I don't know who you are, where you are, [3] but I wanted to say thank you for your work in regards to unreliable sources. DareshMohan (talk) 23:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: It looks odd that Dookudu is a GA when you removed so many of its sources. DareshMohan (talk) 18:41, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: @DareshMohan: is this url reachable for you? Not for me.

[4] RangersRus (talk) 20:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the revert comment lots of typos i had. I was saying "Good faith. if it is just one src that is in question, it can be discussed on talk page but whole revert is not needed here. please discuss in talk page or ICTFSOURCES talk page how an untreachable blog https://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2010/10/01/machu-picchu-welcomes-rajnikanth-and-india/ is reliable. RangersRus (talk) 20:11, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RangersRus, here you go Kailash29792 (talk) 02:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review all or some instances of Indiaglitz and Behindwoods on Ayan (film) if @Kailash29792: agrees. DareshMohan (talk) 08:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to the removal of them from the reception section first. All other instance, please put cn. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:42, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indiankanoon.org

Please DON'T remove this from any article. Why do you doubt its reliability? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:26, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a database where crawlers upload court documents. Court documents, are not acceptable primary sources. The statement on the film page is supported by secondary independent new Indian Express source. "Court documents, are usually not acceptable primary sources because it is impossible for the viewer to know whether the person listed on the document is the notable subject rather than another person who happens to have the same name." Secondary independent source is much more acceptable and gives support to the statement. RangersRus (talk) 16:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Starspawn

Starspawn is deleted G6. Please proceed with draft accpetance. -- Whpq (talk) 19:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections: Voting phase

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for review

Hello, i've done as you commanded me to and removed the 2 blog sites (Mumbai77 and Wordpress) references. I've added more books and news articles as references and have replaced the Mumbai77 ones with 'Chalo' the official partners of B.E.S.T. (the company which runs the buses in Mumbai). I hope this is better. Draft:Play House (Mumbai) Indianx123 (talk) 13:00, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

Anarchyte (talk) 09:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove numbers from Reception sections

see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Numbers. I need your help. DareshMohan (talk) 01:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DareshMohan: thank you for the message. Is this not followed?

"Avoid beginning a sentence with a figure:

Use: There were many matches; 23 ended in a draw. Or: There were many matches. Twenty-three ended in a draw.

Not: There were many matches. 23 ended in a draw." Is someone not following this or you had different concern? RangersRus (talk) 12:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You must be talking about this "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words." This rule should be followed. I was not aware of this and thank you for showing this to me. If someone is not following this, please show them this on editor's talk page. Please let me know where I can help. RangersRus (talk) 12:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many film articles use numbers sadly. Spy (2023 film). DareshMohan (talk) 13:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at Murivu

You declined this. Anther editor has made a pseudo acceptance, using AFC templates to do so, but is not an accepted reviewer in any sense, having only 167 edits in their edit log. You may wish to consider the article. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried but trying to find out who can help. You are right that it has been fiddled with that the move back to draft is not so simple (for me). The editor who moved also posted a fake AFC acceptance message. RangersRus (talk) 10:45, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page mover rights do not allow me to do this either. Thank you for commenting on the SPI. If you are unfamiliar with opening an SPI, Twinkle does it all, automagically.

The next question is to AfD or not to AfD. It is a disputed draftification, but does it pass WP:NFILM? It cannot be returned to draft without consensus at AfD now. See WP:DRAFTOBJECT

Reviewing drafts takes us down interesting paths! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:13, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:29:16, 13 November 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Larkmean

Larkmean (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Gaurav Kapadia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello there,

Hoping you can help me learn. I'm not sure why Gaurav Kapadia's coverage in publications like the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and Financial Times is insufficient evidence of notability. He seems to keep a low profile—nearly zero interviews—which is one reason I want to create a Wikipedia page about him. Google Trends data shows his name is regularly googled: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=gaurav%20kapadia&hl=en

Specifically, I don't know if I agree with the assessment that there are only passing mentions of the subject in the citations provided:

New York Times article about his wedding: https://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/fashion/weddings/26jain.html
A full profile of him from the prominent Mellon Foundation as he joined their board: https://www.mellon.org/news/melissa-gilliam-and-gaurav-kapadia-join-mellon-foundations-board
Several articles chronicling his career and focusing on him at the center of the fund he runs, including this one from WSJ: https://www.wsj.com/articles/hedge-fund-launches-pick-up-despite-covid-19-pandemic-11596466800

I'd like to either revise my submission to make the subject's notability clear or be convinced that the subject is indeed not notable. I'm flexible and open, so I'm very down to learn that something I'm interested in doesn't meet the criteria. But in this case, I'm reading the contribution guidelines and reasoning for not getting published, and it doesn't make sense to me. Makes me think I just need to revise something in my submission or that some information must have been muddled in my writing.

In the finance and investing world, the subject is a well known figure, and after hearing him come up in technology and NYC conversations and having to learn his story on my own, I would like to understand what else I need in order to publish this information on Wikipedia as a central source of truth for others.

If there's anything you can help me further understand, I would be happy to put in the work to meet requirements. But at a glance, I'm not seeing the lack of reputable sources or lack of in-depth coverage in the information I've provided.

Larkmean (talk) 19:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some criterias to consider notability.

The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times; or
The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field; or
The person has an entry in a country's standard national biographical dictionary (e.g. the Dictionary of National Biography). * The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

You have to avoid criteria based on search engine statistics (for example, Google hits or Alexa ranking).

Please make sure to use secondary independent reliable sources with significant coverage that shows that the subject meets the criteria above. Source like radaris.com is not accepted. When you believe that these criterias are met, please re-submit the draft. RangersRus (talk) 21:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Devara box office

Please have a look on Devara: Part 1 box office. While Pinkvilla stated it grossed only ₹403 in its final run,[5] BH stated that it grossed ₹521 crore in just 18 days.[6] BH source does not feel good for me here. Charliehdb (talk) 13:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Make a range from 408 - 521 and add both pinkvilla and BH sources. Some editors do make errors when reporting but BH is still reliable source. NDTV and Times of India have reported figure of over 500 globally so maybe it could be right but I did not find any other source that says 521+. RangersRus (talk) 13:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DNA reported the collection to be ₹380 crore. It too can be added. Charliehdb (talk) 13:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please add it as I'm not free nowadays. Charliehdb (talk) 13:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, then it will be 380 - 521 showing all three sources. RangersRus (talk) 13:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dhanush

What in the world is this? I don't oppose your removal of unreliable sources, only the reliable ones like The Hindu. I can't readd them via mobile, so please explain why the Hindu sources were removed. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit was from Sep 26 before you corrected me after revert of same source on another page showing me that the archive link was verifiable even if url shows page not found. I will try to add these sometime today. RangersRus (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: The Hindu sources are on the page now. Thank you for reaching out. RangersRus (talk) 10:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Assassination of Muhammad Ghori rejected

Hi, you recently rejected my draft due to it being a fork from the Muhammad Ghori wiki. I read over the contect forks wikipedia and it states that it may be acceptable if the article proposed is a 'spin off' from the main wikipedia page (in this case Muhammad Ghori) to further expand on a sub-topic, in this case the assassination specifically of him. I was reading some of the examples on the wikipedia page describing where it may be acceptable and it was topics such as: the death of Michael Jackson spun off from the Michael Jackson wikipedia, so I feel it should be re-submitted to be added to the main space.

I can add on further information if you feel as though content is lacking specifically about his assassination, though the events specifically building up to it section has a decent amount of information already.

Thank you in advance. Zenithxxx (talk) 19:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism in Adelaide moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tourism in Adelaide. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and Most likely created by an LLM (Large-language model)/AI.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 00:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying factual misrepresentation of data by an established editor

Please address the subtitle vandalism being carried out by an editor on the List of highest-grossing Kannada films (KGF: Chapter 2). The editor is misrepresenting facts by selectively removing reliable sources and introducing sources that do not meet established reliability standards, enabling figures to be manipulated to suit their preferred narrative.

For ranking articles, giving undue preference to any particular film undermines the fairness and integrity of the entire ranking. Additionally, the selective removal of reliable sources compromises the credibility of the financial summary, as accuracy is paramount in such data, not arbitrary adjustments.

Due to personal reasons, I will be unable to contribute to Wikipedia for some time. I kindly request you to address this issue promptly. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 06:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]