Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Kamal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 15:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sandeep Kamal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As it turns out, this person is not notable at all--there is nothing whatsoever except for the IMDB entry. Drmies (talk) 04:06, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:N. Good faith Google searches return no reliable sources, and the fact that the page appears to have been created by Mr Kamal himself suggests it's probably just a vanity page rather than an honest attempt to document a genuinely notable person. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. Article is written by its subject, who is a technician in a film studio. Fails WP:N, WP:COI, etc. I do not believe the entry can ever meet notability requirements - the problem does not appear to be with sourcing. - Corporal Tunnel (talk) 04:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, fails WP:BIO and is nothing but an autobiography. Woogee (talk) 04:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, {{db-bio}}. Anna Lincoln 08:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- —SpacemanSpiff 10:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He appears to be a useful and productive member of his profession, but there just aren't any reliable sources to demonstrate that he is also notable, and that's what matters here. Favonian (talk) 10:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.