Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WEGI
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW; this closure is in no way influenced by my own !vote, but rather by the obvious consensus here. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Couldn't find a CSD criteria for it. Lacks references and isn't verifiable. UzEE (Talk • Contribs) 00:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I found their website, and I believe all FCC-licensed full-power stations are inherently notable by default. Just needs to be wikified (along with all of his other new articles). ViperSnake151 00:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - poor quality article, but notability as an FCC licensed station. matt91486 (talk) 01:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Licenced radio stations are inherently notable. A Google search could have found sources for this in an instant. The article has been cleaned up and sourced as a stub. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The creator is apparently someone affiliated with the station's owner, but full-power stations are generally considered notable. --L. Pistachio (talk) 02:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I just warned the author about WP:COI, but the article is now a standard stub, not that it was promotional to begin with. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, perhaps snowball. All FCC licensed stations are considered notable by default; subsequent cleanup now makes for a very serviceable stub. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, with a snowball on the side. Yeah, the author's COI, but per Matt, keep, as it is indeed an FCC licensed station. DodgerOfZion (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per consensus of WP:Inherent notability of FCC-licensed stations. Alansohn (talk) 05:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep FCC-licensed station. Maxamegalon2000 06:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per discussion, and I'm calling a definite WP:SNOW here. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable and the nominator's reasoning is just bizarre. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as it clearly passes WP:NOTE and WP:V. -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 16:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.