Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 September 12
September 12
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
procedural move from "speedy" for more input... speedy template stated: "Available on various web pages on the internet" (claimed to be a work of the Indian government, but only texts of laws, judicial opinions, and other government reports are free from copyright per the Indian Copyright Act of 1957, Chapter V, Section 25)." Ergo, no source to prove (c) claim Skier Dude (talk) 01:16, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A lot of Indian images have the text This image is a work of an Indian Government employee, taken or made during the course of the person's official duties. As a work of the India Government, the image is in the public domain. which is actually not true the Indian Right to Information Act gives free access to government data but nothing in the act says it can then be re-used for anything for example commercial activities. In the public domain means it is available to the public not to do with what they want. So it really needs a fair use rationale at least. MilborneOne (talk) 14:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Exactly. Delete Hekerui (talk) 01:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Album cover for Mnemonic (band) - highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder; no WP:OTRS permission provided Skier Dude (talk) 01:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC) Uploader IS the copyright owner and also a member of the band which is the subject of the Wikipedia article and permission has been therefore granted for the photo to be released into public domain.[reply]
- Uploader instructed to prove claims through WP:OTRS Skier Dude (talk) 05:27, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Album cover for Mnemonic (band) - highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder; no WP:OTRS permission provided Skier Dude (talk) 01:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC) Uploader IS the copyright owner and also a member of the band which is the subject of the Wikipedia article and permission has been therefore granted for the photo to be released into public domain.[reply]
- Uploader instructed to prove claims through WP:OTRS Skier Dude (talk) 05:27, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Album cover for Mnemonic (band) - highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder; no WP:OTRS permission provided - no license provided Skier Dude (talk) 01:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC) Uploader IS the copyright owner and also a member of the band which is the subject of the Wikipedia article and permission has been therefore granted for the photo to be released into public domain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evilpet (talk • contribs) 22:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Uploader instructed to prove claims through WP:OTRS Skier Dude (talk) 05:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. No reason to believe this file is in violation of copyright. Sites given below cite Wikipedia (and even use the direct image link from Wikipedia) as their source for information and file. Therefore, there's no reason to delete this file. — ξxplicit 07:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
User states he took this picture along with pictures of 50 other senators. Very unlikely. warrior4321 17:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is this very unlikely?--72.255.2.0 (talk) 04:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A Wikipedian has taken images of more than fifty senators? It is very unlikely. It is very hard to believe. As well, the user has had many other problems concerning image copyrights. warrior4321 22:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- So, in other words, this your hunch, you have nothing concrete to back it up?--72.255.2.0 (talk) 01:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Can I go around posting pictures on Wikipedia of celebrities stating that I took them? It's highly unlikely. Celebrities are not waiting in line for this Wikipedian to take photos of them. warrior4321 01:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- So, you know who took the picture?--72.255.2.0 (talk) 01:36, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's really pretty simple, I took this picture, uploaded it and released any copyright claims. Neither I nor wikipedia, apparently stop other people from using images posted on wikipedia.--1MSU-LAX •talk• 02:38, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, under closer review I notice one of them directly references Wikipedia, while the other is dated much later than the image was posted to wikipedia. That is good enough for me as to the other website postings of the same photo. Tiggerjay (talk) 04:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.