Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Davies

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. 16:39, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

John Davies

Incomplete nomination by User:Ashdurbat. Not sure why, my vote would be keep. R adiant _* 14:28, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Keep good disambiguation page. See no reason to get rid of it. Wikibofh 15:37, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are multiple John Davies with Wikipedia articles, hence a disambig page is useful. Average Earthman 16:22, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Why on Earth delete a disambig page?? Urhixidur 16:37, 2005 May 18 (UTC)

I'm closing this as a speedy keep, since nobody has actually given a reason why it should be listed here. As I've said before - if you find an incomplete {{vfd}}, you've no obligation to add it to WP:VFD, particularly if it's such a clear-cut case. sjorford →•← 16:39, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. R adiant _* 08:21, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.