Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Amministratori/Riconferma annuale/Vituzzu/16

< Wikipedia:Amministratori | Riconferma annuale | Vituzzu
Versione del 3 giu 2024 alle 21:24 di 68.208.127.67 (discussione) (→Contrari alla riconferma)

Vituzzu

Amministratore dal 01/01/2008 con funzioni di burocrate dal 17/11/2008 e con funzioni di check user dal 31/05/2016, Vituzzu (discussioni · contributi · spostamenti · blocchi · numero di modifiche · registri).

La procedura di riconferma tacita con la modalità del silenzio assenso inizia il 31 maggio 2024 alle 00:00 e finisce il 7 giugno 2024 alle 00:00.


Commenti dell'amministratore

Sull'anno di attività appena trascorso, su cosa si pensa di poter dare in futuro e così via. N.B. L'utilizzo di tale sezione è facoltativo.

  • ...


Contrari alla riconferma

Ogni voto deve essere accompagnato da una motivazione, come da linee guida.

  1. Sono contrario dopo aver letto le critiche a Vituzzu sul suo NEGATO rinnovo a "Steward" di en.wikipedia.

([1]) :

  • Remove, regretfully. Vituzzu's on-wiki comments in response to the Gitz6666 case, both on enwiki and on the confirm page, are not what we expect from stewards. This sentiment was voiced by many established contributors and multiple admins/functs on the confirm page, and my perspective basically aligns with Barkeep49's comment. It's important to remember that the audience of our on-wiki messaging about stewards' cases is as much uninvolved observers as it is the person we're replying to: getting heated in responses reflects poorly on the steward who made them, and stewards as a group. Regards, Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 17:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove an sufficient consensus to keep has not emerged. — xaosflux Talk 23:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove No consensus to re-confirm. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove, with regret. The community has spoken. While confirmations aren't the same as elections, the level of support is not sufficient to confirm. Huge +1 to what Vermont wrote as well. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove due to lack of consensus. ━ ALBERTOLEONCIO Who, me? 14:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove, with large regret. I've thought about this for a while, and while I would have personally kept Vituzzu, this is the community's decision and we can't ignore that. So, remove, but also a Weak keep due to Vituzzu's good work throughout the years. EPIC (talk) 16:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove Lack of consensus to re-confirm. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 17:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove – A significant minority of the community feels that Vituzzu's responses in the Wikipedia Signpost discussion and their confirmation discussion were unbecoming of a Steward. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove with enormous regret. It's really a single issue, and shouldn't be sufficient to out-balance the years of effective work. But the community is the community and the level of support is too low to reconfirm. Sorry. MarcGarver (talk) 11:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove regretfully. Thanks for all your work. --❄️Mykola❄️ 22:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove with sadness. Even though the issues pointed out are relevant, I believe this is a problem that could have received a better treatment. There must have a remedy that could have solved this whole situation without completely removing Vito from Stewards group. Perhaps it is too late to mention anyway. Perhaps we should be able to choose some third option between keep or remove. In all those years, Vito’s work was important across many wikis and and IMO it surpasses his mistakes. That should be taken in consideration. Community has spoken and we must attest what we can infer from the discussion and there is no consensus to keep.—Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 23:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove per Teles and MarcGarver. I agree that the situation could have gone differently, this didn't necessarily have to lead to removal, but there is no sufficient consensus to keep now. Thanks for your work! --Johannnes89 (talk) 07:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Remove Difficult case behind all the comments, but I see no consensus to confirm the user at this time. -- Tegel (Talk) 11:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Era ora.....--68.208.127.67 (msg) 22:24, 3 giu 2024 (CEST)[rispondi]

Commenti

Estratto da "https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Amministratori/Riconferma_annuale/Vituzzu/16&oldid=139603169"