Archives: 20192020

Will u do wikipedia creation

Hey, I waa wondering will u make Wikipedia for paid. The person have article references Celebmanager (talk) 08:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Celebmanager, What do you mean? ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I am from India. If u will do please drop your contact details Celebmanager (talk) 08:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Celebmanager, Ah, Just for your information subject should be notable to have an article, and the one you are trying to create is not notable. And no I don't take money, we are all volunteers here and if you ultimately get someone, then take my word that they will just fool you because wikidata or Wikipedia articles are not created for money. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I do PR works. Many of my clients need Wikipedia page. So can u do those for paid Celebmanager (talk) 08:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ha got it. Thank you for your information. For notability the articles in Asian age, deccan chronicle these type r not included? Celebmanager (talk) 09:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Celebmanager, They will work unless they are press releases. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:22, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

CU

Hi 1997kB, Your CU-rights have been granted. Thank you for taking this. And a happy New Year! Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 11:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lymantria, Thank you. And a very Happy New Year to you also! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Need Help

Q104091943 a wiki data item has been deleted as spam and advertising but the point is the person (Rajdev Kumar) is the chairperson of Konark Films now this is a missing tag on Konark Films Q105101724. What to do? is it possible to restore the item? if not, then how can I prove chairperson/owner of Konark Films? Got your details from the special page I thought you are an Indian and may you have some knowledge about Konark films and the Konark film festivals. please suggest to me what to do on this topic.Priorcontroller (talk) 12:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked ID

Hello. Please assist to unblock this block (ID #25560). these are new users that particited in a wikidata event. This block is frustrating our participants engagement. Thank you -Samatics (talk) 08:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Samatics, Hello, Looking into it. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hey, Samatics, I can't find any block with block id #25560. Could you please recheck and give me correct id? ‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the prompt response. IP address: 197.210.0.0/16 and Block (ID #25560). Thanks. -Samatics (talk) 10:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Please respond. This block is really Frustrating our after event participants engagement.--Samatics (talk) 09:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Samatics, Hey, sorry for the delay. There's so much spam on this range that we can not unblock it, however, the block is not stopping users who already have an account, and for users who doesn't have an account you can create it for them although the daily limit is 6 account creation but if you need to create more, you can ask for account creator right. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Revert of vandalism

Hi 1997kB, recently you blocked an IP address (5.43.83.177) from where at least one item was vandalized. The item I am talking about, is Q23009087. I am hardly active here on Wikidata and have no idea how to sort the mess that that anon created. Could you help me? Would you be willing to put the item back in proper condition? If not, where would I need to go to have it fixed? Hiro (talk) 08:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hiro, Hey, they were if I remember correctly they were blocked for reverting bot edits. For the item in question it looks like you sorted it but if you still need help, feel free to ping me. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
1997kB: The anon did a whole bunch of edits but I only reverted a few. Just now they vandalized the item yet again. Is it possible to revert back to a specific version of the item, so I don't have to go through the entire list of edits that need to be corrected? If so, this version is the correct one. Hiro (talk) 15:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply