Property talk:P998
This property was previously considered for deletion but kept. |
Documentation
category path at Open Directory Project
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P998#Conflicts with P31, search, SPARQL
(Arts|Games|Kids_and_Teens|Reference|Shopping|Business|Health|News|Regional|Society|Computers|Home|Recreation|Science|Sports|World)/\S+
”: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P998#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P998#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P998#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P998#Format, SPARQL
Specifying the language of a catalogue section
editWould you consider Property:P407 or Property:P2439 as more appropriate to specify the language of a catalogue section? I tend pick the latter one as more general (i.e. Q234025), but I've noticed the usage of Property:P407 in Q42. We need a convention here as it's necessary for template builing on all of Wikipedias. --eugrus (talk) 11:59, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Rename to Curlie or split?
edit@Innocent bystander, Otourly, eugrus:, dmoz was closed in 2017; at this moment @Koavf: set redirect url to Curlie, which looks like a different project (due to editability, which eventually should lead to link incompatibility). But how different these projects are? Wouldn't it be better to mark this property with Wikidata property for a discontinued website (Q60457486) and suggest a new property? --Lockal (talk) 07:35, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- A majority of the community went to Curlie but yes, DMOZ is defunct. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
That's a tricky question. The thing is Curlie not only has the Dmoz's database, but also the editors are the same. I prefer to stick to the status quo in the naming conventions as for now. There is still a slight possibility that the community would somehow acquire the dmoz trademark and domain from the previous commercial owner. eugrus (talk) 09:49, 1 April 2021 (UTC)