Wikidata:Property proposal/MNHN ID
MNHN taxon ID
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science
| Description | identifier for a taxon on the Muséum national d'histoire naturelle website |
|---|---|
| Represents | Muséum national d'histoire naturelle (Q838691) |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | taxon (Q16521) |
| Allowed values | String |
| Example 1 | Catolechia (Q5053838) → genus/catolechia |
| Example 2 | Carex elata (Q161128) → species/carex/stricta |
| Example 3 | Mormopterus francoismoutoui (Q2579310) → species/mormopterus/francoismoutoui |
| Source | https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/search/form |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Planned use | Template:Taxonbar (Q57623579) |
| Formatter URL | https://science.mnhn.fr/taxon/$1 |
- Motivation
This new Wikidata property to identify taxa (Q42396390) would improve our coverage of biology (Q420). Thierry Caro (talk) 01:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- Discussion
WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead..
Notified participants of WikiProject France. Thierry Caro (talk) 01:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Support. MargaretRDonald (talk) 04:40, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Oppose --Succu (talk) 05:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Succu: why? Nomen ad hoc (talk) 06:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC).
- @Nomen ad hoc: Why did you support this proposal? You gave no motivation. I'm tiered of this kind of pseudo external ids. Why should we link to the genus Carex (= Carex (Q158501)) that way? --Succu (talk) 19:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't give any because I just agreed the proposal's motivation. And I still don't understand your objections. Well, no matter. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 19:15, 24 October 2018 (UTC).
- @Nomen ad hoc: Why did you support this proposal? You gave no motivation. I'm tiered of this kind of pseudo external ids. Why should we link to the genus Carex (= Carex (Q158501)) that way? --Succu (talk) 19:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Succu: why? Nomen ad hoc (talk) 06:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC).
- Support. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 06:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC).
- Support — Ayack (talk) 11:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
@Nomen ad hoc, MargaretRDonald, Thierry Caro, Succu, Ayack: 
Done: MNHN taxon ID (P6046). − Pintoch (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)