Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:17, 5 July 2024

This is a message board for talking about tasks on Wikipedia that only administrators can do. Please put new messages at the bottom of the talk page or click here to start a new discussion.

Please note that the messages on this page are archived periodically. A message may therefore have been archived. Note however, that the archives must not be modified, so if something needs discussing, please start a new discussion on this page.

Are you in the right place?

This is the Simple English Wikipedia. Click here for the Administrators' Noticeboard on the regular English Wikipedia.
Use Vandalism in progress to report serious and urgent vandalism from other users to administrators.
Use Requests for permissions to request administrators to give you tools that can help you do things faster on Wikipedia, such as rollback.
Use Simple talk to ask general questions about Wikipedia and how to use it.
See meta:Steward requests/Username changes to change your user name or take another user name.
See WP:RFCU for CheckUser requests.
See WP:OS for oversight.

Protection for Mary Shelley

Vandalised many times.-Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Cactus🌵 ^Yum ^o.o 10:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme: Probably not too much use responding to it now but there was only vandalism from one IP across one day. In cases like these, a block is needed. Page protection is only used as a last resort. --Ferien2 (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you user:Ferien?, if your are, okay, thanks!! Cactus ^spiky ^ouch 11:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme: yep sorry for the confusion, I couldn't access my laptop at the time. --Ferien (talk) 11:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, its fine, I just found a bit suspicious Cactus ^spiky ^ouch 11:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme: If you see other users claiming to be people, you should take a look at their userpage to see whether the account they have claimed to be have linked to them. For example, on my meta userpage for User:Ferien2, I decided to just sign on their userpage in m:Special:Diff/21487714, and it's in a section on my userpage: User:Ferien#Other accounts --Ferien (talk) 11:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ohk, will look into that in the future. Thanks Cactus ^spiky ^ouch 11:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GFDL

Hi! I noticed that Template:GFDL have disclaimers and per en:Wikipedia:GFDL standardization disclaimers should be avoided. Since most of the files are spoken articles they should have the same license as the articles on Wikipedia. So we could argue that it was a mistake to add the disclaimers and that they could be removed.

I also noticed that many of the files are also on Commons. So the local file could be deleted. Perhaps someone could have a look and decide what to do? --MGA73 (talk) 16:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to remove the disclaimers. If the articles are GFDL so should spoken versions be so no need for disclaimers. --MGA73 (talk) 16:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection for Animal

Vandalised multiple times Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 09:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalism seems to have stopped for now. Will keep an eye on it to see if it continues. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 19:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will also tell you if i spot anything Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 23:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect Loki (Marvel Comics)

Lots of nonsense, same pest from the enwiki article Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done MathXplore (talk) 13:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And...please block all those sockpuppets...@MathXplore Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page is a target too...Loki (Marvel Cinematic Universe) Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done MathXplore (talk) 13:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully we'll get a rest from this now. Added padlocks. Might wanna protect Loki too. @MathXplore Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done MathXplore (talk) 13:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Until they find another Loki article:)@MathXplore Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding Loki (TV series). Now there onto Loki (season 1) and Loki (season 2) @MathXplore Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect season 1 too@MathXplore Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done MathXplore (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP making edits and then reverting themselves immediately after

Hi, So we have an IP 2.98.119.86 who copypastes from en and then reverts themselves immediately after - I know some accounts do this in order to gain autoconfirmed/Extended confirmed status but I didn't know if there was any reason why the IP is doing it?,

As far as I'm aware IPs aren't able to get the access levels registered users can get so I'm rather baffled here, Anyway not sure if this would tantamount to disruptive editing so thought I'd ask/post here, Thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 18:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done MathXplore (talk) 06:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay glad I did ask here now, would be interesting to know what they think they're achieving though, Anyway thanks for blocking them much appreciated, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome

This article Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome is clearly not ready for mainspace yet, because it was copied directly from enwiki. However, the user who created it seems to be trying to simplify it. Could it be moved to their userspace (User:Produde29499/Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome) so they can work on it there? As they are not autoconfirmed, they won't be able to move it themself yet.

@Produde29499: See above. 157.131.67.250 (talk) 22:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done MathXplore (talk) 00:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request

Hi, Could List of programs broadcast by Sprout be indef-protected please as vandal IPs keep undoing the redirect (also is a redirect on EN), Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 15:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done fr33k man 15:24, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Antoniụs

G5 but user keeps removing QD tags
Page should be salted MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 23:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MCGAMER YOUTUBE: I usually consider salting if a page is deleted 3 times or more within a short period (that's just my personal rule of thumb), but I only see one delete for this one. Has it been created under any different names? -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Tyler Antonius (2nd nomination) JoshuaAuble (talk) 02:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the original article's deletion log MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 18:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deleted. MathXplore (talk) 05:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/136.158.7.247

This IP is currently indef blocked, but according to w:Wikipedia:Blocking_IP_addresses#Block_lengths, the block should not be indefinite. How should we reduce or unblock the IP? MathXplore (talk) 11:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While were on the subject, I found another indef block on an IP range 2600:1700:9291:1B60:0:0:0:0/64 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MathXplore, if you seen IPs like these, just reduce the block or unblock them depending on how long it's been. Me Da Wikipedian, I've unblocked that range also, thanks for bringing it up. --Ferien (talk) 17:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome for both. Seems like this is actually a pretty common problem here and on enwiki...do you mind checking [1] for further stuff...@Ferien Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 18:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I used to monitor that on a semi-regular basis both here and on en but looks like I haven't done it in about a year. That list is now empty. --Ferien (talk) 18:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and have a nice day! @Ferien Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 18:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Revdel

~~Requesting Revision deletion of revision Special:Diff/9614308 per WP:RD2. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 15:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

Comment: Nominated the talk page for QD instead. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 16:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done by User:Fr33kman. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 23:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages don't usually get QDed so people don't get discouraged from commenting on an article's issues. The vandalism isn't RevDellable, so I've restored it leaving just the talk header in the current revision. --Ferien (talk) 18:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dot and the Kangaroo (2030 movie)

A QD A4 case; forwarding deletion request here as an editor keeps on removing the quick deletion templates. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 16:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly, also a QD A6 case; persistent re-creation of the page (See logs). – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 16:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Page deleted by User:Ferien. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 23:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request2

Hi, Could the following pages be indef protected please?

Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 19:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010 I admittedly did not go through every one of them, but the ones I went through have no vandalism. Pages are generally not protected pre-emptively. Also, I don't believe that non-autoconfirmed users are able to edit user pages anyways (because of an edit filter) and there would no point in semi-protection (assuming your not suggesting full as then you can't edit). Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Me Da Wikipedian You are not an administrator. You have no need to reply to requests like this. Also user pages can be protected, and it is possible for IPs to edit user subpages (I just did it to test). 136.152.209.22 (talk) 21:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And...nor are you. You can edit subpages, not the actual userpage itself. And please undo any test edit. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Me Da Wikipedian Yes I know that. I wouldn't have commented here if you hadn't done so. I see you have been informed before about comments in RFP's being unnecessary. The user subpages can also be vandalized and "no pre-emptive protection" doesn't apply to user or talk pages. I undid the test edit. 136.152.209.22 (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello...This is not an RFP...and no pre-emptive protection, unless you can show me otherwise seems like it applies everywhere with few exceptions Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Me Da Wikipedian Do you really have nothing better to do than sticking your nose in places that don't concern you?. Like you're not even an admin here so why do you feel the need to comment here ?

I wanted these protected as A) In a few days time I'll be requesting an indef block here and B) my archives have previously been targetted by IPs and as such I would rather leave here with the knowledge and hope everything will be preserved,

These aren't used anywhere and they don't require updates so there's no reason not to protect them, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 22:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"In a few days time I'll be requesting an indef block here" don't leave, please? You understand the vandal wins if they drive you away @Davey2010 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words but it's not the IP I'm bothered about - It's Auntof6 and her actions, I was blocked for 24 hours for using the words "god damn" and calling the vandal IP a moron and then because I replied on my talkpage that "[She's] Clutching at straws in order to block me is sad and rather pathetic" earned me a talkpage access revocation,

If we're going to block people for using words like "god damn" and "idiot" as well as refuse to block vandal IPs on the basis that "they've been insufficiently warned" despite it being plain as day the IP is not here to contribute to this encyclopedia then yeah I want no further part of this project.

I appreciate the latter may not be "policy" but the IP in question makes the same vandal edits again and again which is why they're on a 3rd/4th block ..... I don't have the mental patience to go through the warning system for a vandal who clearly only uses this place to vandalise and whos also the same person,

The sad part is since my Commons block I've tried addressing and adjusting my incivility and tried to be more calmer and also tried using the word fuck less often ... all to no avail. I tried. –Davey2010^Talk 23:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we refuse to block people who had not been sufficently warned. If you want to change that, ignoring the policy is not how to go about it. I also find it, err, interesting that one of your reasons for being unblocked on Commons was insufficent warning, but whatever.

Anyways remember when I said that I disagree with you being blocked for 24 hours? Looking at your history on Commons and enwiki I'd say maybe it was too short. You are on your 8th block on Commons and enwiki.

In the future, please try to address your incivility by being civil. Thank you.

But this is not a reason to leave. Unless a civility policy is truly too much to handle (which I doubt), I see no reason why you can't work on it and remain a helpful member of simplewiki. @Davey2010 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 02:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"we refuse to block people who had not been sufficently warned" Well if that were the case then the 2 previous blocking admins would've declined my report ... so that's a lie.

Difference was I'm not a vandal ... I didn't vandalise the project and then say "I've been insufficiently warned".... I get your point but if this guy wasn't a vandal and was making good-but-clumsy edits then of course I'd warn them repeatedly/80 times if I had too,

FYI, All of my blocks on EN and Commons have centered around my usage of the word fuck (fuck off, no fucks given) .... Did I use the word fuck in my reply at VIP? No. Did I replace the word fuck with god damn? Yes. If that's not addressing my incvility issue I don't know what is!, My reply was full of rage sure but it was hardly incivil and hardly deserved a block over and most certainly didn't deserve tpa over,

If civility policies were too much to handle don't you think I would've left EN 10 years ago ?.... I accept irrespective of my views, we have en:Wikipedia:Comment on the content, not the contributor for a reason, so for the moron comment a warning would've sufficed .... but I refuse to be a part of a project where you can be blocked for using non-offensive words like "god damn" .... and then hilariously have your TPA revoked over calling their actions sad/pathetic,

Anyway all of this is irrelevant to my above post, Have a great day. –Davey2010^Talk 11:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're not a vandal, yes. That is not free-license to do anything at all you want. It is not the case that or a few sets of words/phrases are the only possible incivil things. What is addressing your incivility issue is by replacing things that are uncivil with this that are actually civil themselves (or just removing the uncivil things to begin with). "a warning would've sufficed" if you hadn't been blocked 16 times for some sort of incivility elsewhere. "god damn" can be offensive, by the way.

Also what times were they blocked without sufficient warning. The May 24 they had plenty of warnings but just blanked in between, May 29 I gave them a final warning, June 6 was Vandalism within 1 day of being unblocked (which I believe doesn't require warnings), and thats it.

Also, to cite enwiki for you, NPA is not free-license to avoid people acting based on a long pattern of yours.

Anyways, I hope you don't leave. Here's an idea:Don't type when your angry. It never ends well. @Davey2010 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010 and Me Da Wikipedian: All

Done. For what it's worth, user pages can be protected at the user's discretion, and that may be pre-emptive or not. I appreciate that hasn't been written in policy, I've just boldly updated it to reflect standard practice. With this whole situation, both sides made mistakes, and I sincerely hope we can move on and not lose either valued contributor through this. --Ferien (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. @Ferien Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ferien, Many thanks I greatly appreciate your help,

I don't know why but I assumed I had to go through levels 1-5 each time when in fact I can just level 5/6 them each time - still relatively pointless but at least it's not wasting much time as if you were doing 1-5 each time,

@Me Da Wikipedian I've just checked and they were blocked without warning on the 6th June, Thing is though I've also had a vandals IP rangeblocked on different IPs whom have not recieved warnings after blocks either and again this wasn't queried/questioned by anyone, Maybe it's just been assumed I have warned them and because of that I've just assumed my way has been okay when in fact it hasn't and I've just not known that,

Maybe the TPA revoc was a blessing in disguise, maybe they did that to keep me around and I just didn't know :), Anyway we live and we learn, I'll do better going forward, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I assumed I had to go through levels 1-5 each time when in fact I can just level 5/6 them each time" - There are only 4 level of warnings. Confused. Vandalism within 1 day of being unblocked is (I believe) a valid reason to block without warnings.

"the TPA revoc was a blessing in disguise, maybe they did that to keep me around" - Could you explain?

"I'll do better going forward" - Thank you.

@Davey2010 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 22:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only warnings is basically level 5, No worries, Happy editing. –Davey2010^Talk 22:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a little note, very much like enwiki we don't do self blocks as a rule. I am on record as willing to consider them but not for indef. If a user wants to leave then it is normal for them to just leave, as many of our number have done over the years. :) fr33k man 00:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fr33kman, That's fair enough - some admins do do indef-blocks but they're sparse, Anyway thanks for your reply, Happy editing :), –Davey2010^Talk 09:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not. Only warning is instead of the normal warning process. And what would be 6? A VIP report? Normally you should not do only warnings or VIP reports first though. @Davey2010 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 01:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Admins, please handle this

per Special:Diff/9576286. 136.152.209.22 (talk) 20:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved. Article 26 switched to Article 4, VGA subpage deleted. --Ferien (talk) 17:32, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reform UK

Please protect that page, persistent vandalism 2600:4808:353:7B01:CAF8:9669:E2BF:7C4D (talk) 22:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done for 1 month fr33k man 00:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection3

Can you protect these semi indef

Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And this

User talk:Cactusisme/Archive 1/Archive 1

Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done fr33k man 00:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A short block ruled out?

An IP seems to be spamming new articles about mostly non-notable stars.--Can that account be blocked for say six hours, 12 hours, or 24 hours.--Please see, Wikipedia:Simple_talk#Something_is_rotten_in_the_"land"_of_Stars?. 2001:2020:309:AE06:BD15:72C7:4DB0:35C6 (talk) 18:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion reqest

Hi, Could soneone undelete these and undelete all revisions please? I had asked 2 admins however for whatever reason only one page was restored and then deleted and none of have been undeleted since

–Davey2010^Talk 11:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done MathXplore (talk) 14:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant thanks so much I greatly appreciate you doing this, Have a nice day, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 14:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/Malik-Al-Hind and Special:Contributions/Cyber.Eyes.2005

I see both editors reverting each other's edits repeatedly. What kind of action would be needed here? MathXplore (talk) 13:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no issues with cyber.eyes edits, And I am sorry if any of my edits violated any guidelines of Wikipedia (which I don't think so it did). Regardless since yesterday, I am seeing cyber eyes reverting my edits which are backed up with reliable citations/sources such as here 1 and here 2. I will honestly prefer to have this peacefully sorted out. And i am sorry again if I have violated any guidelines of Wikipedia considering I am new and I am not aware of all it's rules. Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 14:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My reason for reverting Malik-Al-Hind's edits is not any sort of personal attack. However, their edits to several articles (Special:Diff/9618778 and Special:Diff/9618508) are controversial and POVish. This isn't the first time Malik-Al-Hind has made such edits; they have received multiple "last warnings" from different editors, with the most recent being a couple of weeks ago. This issue is consistent: not willing to gain consensus on the talk page and reverting edits before consensus is reached. In my edit summaries (Special:Diff/9618735, Special:Diff/9618736), I clearly stated the need to gain consensus on the respective articles' talk pages before re-adding these claims, but this was ignored, and my edits were reverted. Gaining consensus is only beneficial and the only method to solve such disputes. I hope @Malik-Al-Hind stops reverting edits and instead seeks consensus from the community. I am more than willing to help them work on this Wikipedia since they are a new member here, for which they need to cooperate as well. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 14:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If not gaining consensus is the problem here, I would do that from now on. Thank you for concerning Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 14:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is mainly the reason for most warnings you have received, and thank you for understanding that. Other disputes, such as a change being POVish or controversial, can be solved on the respective article's talk pages. If anyone wants to join the consensus-building, the discussion is here: Talk:Hulagu Khan#religion. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 15:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection request

Please protect Loki (Marvel Cinematic Universe): sockpuppetry. --Leonidlednev (talk) 23:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done MathXplore (talk) 02:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

special:contribs/38.92.52.229

Vandalism JoshuaAuble (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done MathXplore (talk) 03:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move request 2

Hi, Could someone move Madonna (entertainer) to Madonna please as per matching EN please?and the talkpage too please, Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 16:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Ferien - Ty Ferien much appreciated, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 21:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010: Had a

Done reply ready and waiting here but got distracted and didn't post it here haha, so lazy nowadays :) --Ferien (talk) 21:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferien Haha no worries - I had a feeling you got distracted haha :), Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 21:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very young editor disclosed their birthdate

Not saying their usarname to protect their privacy, but this very young editor (younger than 13, not saying exact age to protect them) disclosed their birthdate on their userpage. Is this OK for their safety? Luckily, they did not say their real name. If you believe it is not safe, I will send an email with their username to an oversighter. Thank you. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 20:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Dream Indigo, please send this to oversight-wp-simple

lists.wikimedia.org as soon as possible for oversighters to take a closer look at the situation. Thank you, --Ferien (talk) 20:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you! I am sending a second email to the enwiki oversighters as well (they have the same userpage there as well). ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 21:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A note for everyone reading this: it is always fine to ask oversighters (privately, of course) if something should be oversighted. Even if you think it might not be worth it, it's always better to be safe. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permenant semiprotection request of Adolf Hitler Uunona

This has been requested a few other times, but the most that has ever come out of it has been a month-long to year-long protection.

The issue is that the "view history" tab is unreadable. When thinking of ways to write out this request, I originally planned to write out the number of occurances in which vandalism occured, but I realize now that it's easier to write out the number of occurances in which vandalism did not occur. Even then, you would have to sort through over 750 edits accumalated over three years of edits that are almost exclusively vandalism.

Vandalism on this page will not ever go away. A month-long or year-long protection will not do anything, and the only thing that leaving this page unprotected does is take away time from people that could be doing other things. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 17:39, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are probably many ways of looking at this/these matter(s).--One way to get around, part of the problem: Those who get annoyed (or whatever), about what happens with the article, should consider finding a way to say to themselves - or perhaps use a mantra-like-thingy, such as "I can stay away from re-checking that article, until the month of say August."--Personally, i am guessing that i have not checked his article for a year (or help with anti-vandalism in that article), without having to use any motivational technique to stay away.--In the past, I have gotten the impression that there is c. nothing really new (and sourced) coming to the English-wiki article, or to the Simple-wiki article. (So the articles say a minimum of his connection to a municipal council etc. And the articles say that he was a member of SWAPO, and are economical with details about what he did.)--Another thing: that article might be one that would be okay to have a tag that says something like: "Some articles, get vandalized sometimes. We try to fix vandalism quickly."--If this post was perceived as helpful, then fine. 2001:2020:329:A884:15D:323:AF7E:55DD (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I almost never find Permenant semiprotection articles on Simple-wiki.--I find that quite refreshing!--I am fine with not making any major changes about changing the protection status, for now.--I trust that there are many - not necessarily including me - who have "the biggest pictures" about simple-wiki; Those many, probably have thing under control. 2001:2020:329:A884:5C31:F636:5603:D (talk) 17:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC) /2001:2020:329:A884:15D:323:AF7E:55DD[reply]

Please protect Loki

The Loki LTA is back at it. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also protect Loki (TV series) Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snooker too please Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done MathXplore (talk) 01:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think none of these have useful content

I think these should all be deleted, because they have no useful content. They might be QD's:

2070s, 2080s, 2090s, 2100s, 2110s, 2120s

- 2607:F140:6000:802A:FDB7:C795:7706:492 (talk) 00:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Not an admin but...) they all have useful content. They all tell you (a bit) of information about the decade Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 09:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Me Da Wikipedian: We delete these (as well as similar ones for years, centuries, etc.) if they contain only the standard header information. I deleted all the ones listed that contained only that. -- Auntof6 (talk) 12:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection

Please create protect Severus Alexander, thanks Cactus ^spiky ^ouch 07:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

multiple nonsense pages created here Cactus ^spiky ^ouch 07:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme: Created where? -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please specify reason for this page. It has been created only once in the last four years. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel

Hi, I'm not sure about the local policies, but this revision possibly violate en:WP:OUTING. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS This revision has been suppressed. Please use the email for any future suppression requests. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 07:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sarcastic kshatriya

This @User:Sarcastic kshatriya is vandalizing articles and creating articles without adding sources, Please remove the Descendants of Lord Krishna and Yadav Rajput articles created by him from the wiki and block this account. Thanks. 2409:4085:9C87:B19C:0:0:8149:5A00 (talk) 19:17, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 331: / Line 331: @@
 :@[[User:GSS|GSS]] This revision has been suppressed. Please use the [[WP:OS|email]] for any future suppression requests. — [[User:Fehufanga|*Fehufangą]] ♮ [[User talk:Fehufanga|✉ Talk page]]  07:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
+== User:Sarcastic kshatriya ==
+This @[[User:Sarcastic kshatriya|User:Sarcastic kshatriya]] is vandalizing articles and creating articles without adding sources, Please remove the [[Descendants of Lord Krishna]] and [[Yadav Rajput]] articles created by him from the wiki and block this account. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/2409:4085:9C87:B19C:0:0:8149:5A00|2409:4085:9C87:B19C:0:0:8149:5A00]] ([[User talk:2409:4085:9C87:B19C:0:0:8149:5A00|talk]]) 19:17, 5 July 2024 (UTC)