Property talk:P3085

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

qualifies for event
this event qualifies for that event
Data typeItem
Template parameter"continentalcup1" and "continentalcup1qualifiers" (etc) in en:template:Infobox football league season
Domaincompetition (Q841654), sports league (Q623109), season (Q27020041) or international association football clubs cup (Q34542757)
Usage notesthe qualified team or person can be added using P1346
Example2015–16 Premier League (Q19346732)2016–17 UEFA Champions League (Q18740961)
2017 WNBA draft (Q25388446)2017 WNBA season (Q27940882)
Sámi Grand Prix (Q4177419)Liet International (Q506080)
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P3085 (Q43650293)
See alsowinner (P1346), classification of race (P2502)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total4,301
Main statement4,19897.6% of uses
Qualifier1022.4% of uses
Reference1<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Value type “competition (Q841654), season (Q27020041), sporting event (Q16510064): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31), subclass of (P279) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value competition (Q841654), season (Q27020041), sporting event (Q16510064) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3085#Value type Q841654, Q27020041, Q16510064, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3085#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3085#Scope, SPARQL

Discussion

[edit]

Usage

[edit]

Moved here from Wikidata:Property proposal/team qualified for continental competition. --Srittau (talk) 12:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Srittau, Pasleim: Please check 1962–63 Cypriot First Division (Q2635672). I have added qualifies for event (P3085) with 1963–64 European Cup (Q500084). Do I must to use Anorthosis Famagusta FC (Q141688) to show that the team which qualifies for that event was Anorthosis Famagusta FC (Q141688)? Xaris333 (talk) 01:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaris333: Looks good to me. --Srittau (talk) 12:32, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Srittau: Can you check the same property at 1964–65 Cypriot First Division (Q2635725)? I have used it with a different way. Instead of league or competition (P118) we could use a qualifier name "to" Wikidata:Property proposal/at. The same way we are using promoted (P2881) and relegated (P2882). Xaris333 (talk) 12:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is the wrong way around. This way we can not - for example - mark the qualification of an upcoming or ongoing event or league. It's basically supposed to be event or leaguequalifies for event (P3085)another eventwinner (P1346)winning team, where the qualifier is optional. --Srittau (talk) 12:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand. The qualifier winner (P1346) is a little problem. I can't think something else. Xaris333 (talk) 12:54, 20 August 2016 (UTC) ΄[reply]

@Srittau: How about this way [1]? Xaris333 (talk) 12:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Srittau: Pls check this way [2]. Xaris333 (talk) 13:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question about the property restriction

[edit]

I have a question regarding the limitation of this property. Personally, I don't understand why the "value type" property restriction exists twice? The second use brings from my point of view unnecessary trouble. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, I fixed it. —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks --Gymnicus (talk) 12:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]