Wikidata:Property proposal/has reply: Difference between revisions

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Nw520 (talk | contribs)
Rdrg109 (talk | contribs)
Line 47: Line 47:
* {{o}} {{ping|Sharouser}} Wikidata in general does not need inverse properties. There is a script or gadget that can display inverse relations if needed. [[User:ArthurPSmith|ArthurPSmith]] ([[User talk:ArthurPSmith|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
* {{o}} {{ping|Sharouser}} Wikidata in general does not need inverse properties. There is a script or gadget that can display inverse relations if needed. [[User:ArthurPSmith|ArthurPSmith]] ([[User talk:ArthurPSmith|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
* {{o}} per ArthurPSmith. Inverse properties are not created just for the sake of having an inverse property, but rather only if they are of meaningful value for modelling. --[[User:Nw520|Nw520]] ([[User talk:Nw520|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 08:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
* {{o}} per ArthurPSmith. Inverse properties are not created just for the sake of having an inverse property, but rather only if they are of meaningful value for modelling. --[[User:Nw520|Nw520]] ([[User talk:Nw520|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 08:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
*:Could you mention examples of inverse properties being meaningful for modelling? -- [[User:Rdrg109|Rdrg109]] ([[User talk:Rdrg109|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 17:55, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:55, 16 October 2022

has reply

You have not transcluded your proposal on Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic yet. Please do it.

   Under discussion

Motivation

We should make a inverse property of reply to (P2675). Sharouser (talk) 15:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion