User talk:Pierpao

grafici militari

Photoshop CS3 :-) --Noclador (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Requested moves on COM:DL

Hi, Just to tell that the requested moves cannot be executed by the delinker bot. Enjoy the work. --Foroa (talk) 11:03, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Category:Women_by_name

Category discussion notification

Category:Women_by_name has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:12, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

People vs peoples

Peoples is correct as the plural of people, ethnic group. The plural of people, a bunch of persons, remains people, a bunch of persons. --Foroa (talk) 14:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Catégories vides

Pourrais-tu s'il te plaît, à ce propos, jeter un coup d'oeil dans

• Category:Streets in Hanover,
• Category:Eclectic architecture in Hanover,
• Category:Listed buildings in Hanover,
• Category:Former listed buildings in Hanover
  

et - si tu comprends l'allemand - dans cette discussion sur le forum? Merci. Bohème (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour ton message et - bingo ! :-) Bohème (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Renaming request for Pont su la Meuse, Domremy-la-Pucelle 01 09.jpg

Thank you for renaming. Please check in future details, when you think you need rename in another name than proposed by the uploader/requester. 01 09 means picture #1 in 2009 of this object and is not part of a date definition. Picture is taken 6 September 2009 not 1st. -- Хрюша ^?? 12:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Question about pd-text

Hi Pierpao,
I saw you 'keep'-decision on this file: File:India_House_Amsterdam_Logo.jpg. I don't want to argue about the decision but I was wondering why this logo is considered to be text only/text with simple geometric shapes. Is the flower considered to be a simple geometric shape? I thought this phrase was relating to squares, circles, semicircles etc and that an arrangement of simple geometric shapes were already considered to be non-simple. Do you have a link where I can read a bit more about this so I don't nominate files anymore that fit this threshold.
Best regards, JZ85 (talk) 08:47, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Cat removing

What is this supposewd to mean? I hope it was by accident, otherwise I'd consider this vandalism [1] - and many others. Please undo all of these edits. --FA2010 (talk) 20:21, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Drassodes Lapidosus.jpg

Obviously you did not understand why I requested renaming the above image. The species depicted there is not Drassodes lapidosus, but a Clubiona sp. Therefore the image is named and described incorrectly. This incorrect name leads to the situation that the image is used on a lot of pages related to Drassodes lapidosus, while, in fact, it is not that species. Readers of Wikipedia are presented with incorrect information all the time because the file is incorrectly named and described.

I am not the only one complaining about this. Also see [2]. The original author seems to be no longer active and does not react.

Please reconsider renaming the file again, otherwise this problem will never be solved. --57.79.167.152 12:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Aiuto: modifica nomi files

Grazie, ho messo la parola "File" davanti al nome di questo file e anche di questo, potresti correggerli? .--Franco aq (talk) 19:09, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Grazie, ma File:Tsarevich (Fabergé egg) surprise - 2.jpg dovrebbe diventare File:Tsarevich (Fabergé egg) and surprise.jpg. --Franco aq (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Paintings frames

Category:Paintings frames has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Saibo (Δ) 00:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:19th century oil paintings

Category:19th century oil paintings has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 19:18, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 45943f6f425989435cecfbdcd6cd383d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Leo Gestel, Self Portrait.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:55, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Screenshots

What movie screenshots am I supposed to have uploaded? Did you even read the descriptions of the images? I have done careful research to check that they are all in the public domain. --Lobo512 (talk) 19:29, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Renaming

There was no reason whatsoever to rename the file http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Leo_Gestel,_Self_portrait,_1941,_pastel.jpg&diff=65822395&oldid=65822314 Please refrain from such senseless renamings. In fact, commas and similar characters are even rather bad in filenames. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 22:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for you suggestion. In commons:rename there is no mention about commas, moreover if they were bad, why are allowed by Mediawiki? Anyway usually i do not use commas in renaming but according to point 6 of commons:rename i did it to armonize Leo gestel self portraits that you can find in category:Leo Gestel. Thanks again--Pierpao.lo (listening) 06:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Contre-jour

Contre-jour is against daylight. It is an extreme form of en:Backlighting_(lighting_design) but not the same. --Foroa (talk) 14:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 009042425b8bcc3aeed057214953ceff

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Categorie "by style" e "by period"

Ciao Pierpao. Volevo avvisarti che ti ho cancellato le due categorie Category:Art in Italy by style e la successiva "by city" che hai creato recentemente. A parte che erano assolutamente ridondanti perché esistono le stesse "by period", ma poi tieni presente che nelle nostre categorie che riguardano l'Italia NON vi sono categorie "by style". Le abbiamo tutte eliminate e sostituite con le corrispondenti "by period"; un lavoro di uniformizzazione che abbiamo fatto un paio di anni fa in quanto queste categorie artistiche erano categorizzate alcune "by style" e altre "by period", risultando così ora l'una, ora l'altra "mancanti o inesistenti" mentre invece erano semplicemente rese nell'altra forma. Giusto per informarti affinché tu possa... uniformarti! "Ciao e buon lavoro. --DenghiùComm (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

File da cancellazione immediata?

Ciao Pierpao. Il file E3 2010 Castlevania Lords of Shadow.jpg che ho caricato poco fa, perché dovrebbe essere da cancellazione immediata? --Fabyrav (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Il fatto è che l'avevo trovato così su Flickr (con questa licenza) e sarebbe stata utile per una pagina, non so poi se la licenza su Flickr è giusta o sbagliata. Comunque la foto si voleva concentrare sull'ambiente e sull'evento, non sul logo o sugli screenshot, però se viola il copyright, pazienza. --Fabyrav (talk) 19:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Category rename

In regards to:Commons:Categories for discussion#Category:Photos of topless females featuring armpits OK You were not too bold. You found something to change/improve, and took action. We depend on everyone's contributions. _{Senator2029║talk} 18:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:Women touching their-selves in art

Category:Women touching their-selves in art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Cynwolfe (talk) 00:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:Katie Waltern

You categorized Category:Katie Waltern in Category:Unidentified people of the United States. That doesn't make much sense to me: if we have her name, in what sense is she "unidentified"? - Jmabel ! talk 05:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Because there was no category before [3] and I didn't know if she was a dancer or a singer or what else, usually people is categorized by job, and... I forgot to add people by name. But if you want you can remove Category:Unidentified people of the United States. Thanks--Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

categorizzazione :)

Ciao Pierpao, ho visto il tuo intervento su Category:Photographs (with graphics effects) of cats grazie :) però guardando un po' ho trovato questa Category:Photographic effects non pensi sia + indicata? al posto di Category:Optical effects ??? grazie ciao (PS: per favore risp nella mia talk come su wikipedia, che sennò mi dimentico, ciao grazie ancora) --Pava (talk) 17:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Mappe di Shepherd

La cartina deriva da File:Shepherd-c-030-031.jpg. Grazie. --Cristiano64 (talk) 08:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Ho fatto qualche aggiunta/precisazione. Spero vada bene :) Correggi pure. Grazie ancora. --Cristiano64 (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: foto di quadri e incisioni

Grazie per la tua cortese risposta. --Massimo Telò (talk) 14:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

COM:File renaming and recent file moves

Hi Pierpao, thanks for volunteering in file renaming. Today I am writing you because I observed some files possibly renamed not in accordance with the policy: [4] [5]. I am also not happy with the situation that we can't change a file's title without the file's name. But we have this technical limitation and changing the file's name often causes trouble (especially if the uploader does not like it or if it is highly in use). So one could interpret the reason "sorting" as Harmonize file names of a set of images or misleading names into accurate ones but this needs a lot of fantasy. As long as no one else complains it's not a big deal but if someone does you are in danger loosing your file mover flag.

Again, thanks for helping at Commons. Kind regards -- Rillke^(q?) 07:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

categorizzazione sedan Lancia nere

Ciao Pierpao, ho visto che hai cambiato la categorizzazione di alcune fotografie della Lancia Thema 2011, spostandole dalla caterogia "black sedans" alla sottocategoria "black Lancia sedans" senza però averla creata, questo ha portato alle due immagini una lacuna nella loro categorizzazione. Io ora ho creato la categoria che tu molto probabilmente volevi creare però volevo chiederti se avevi fatto queste operazioni anche con altre immagini. Ciao grazie --Pava (talk) 22:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

la mia non era una critica, volevo solo capire, cmq le avevi categorizzate come 2010 black sedan ed era vuota anche quella, le ho spostate io, ho solo chiesto perchè quei link rossi. Non ho capito come posso aiutarti, lo faccio volentieri :) --Pava (talk) 18:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Wrong edit

Please note that "by 1938" means "before 1938 or in 1938", not "in 1938". http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Christian_Rohlfs_Buchenwald.jpg&diff=84392847&oldid=84329817 --FA2010 (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Re:Bar italiano

Riguardo a cosa scusa? :) --Viscontino (talk) 12:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Mestieri

Grazie mille. Riguardo ai commenti ti giuro che ho cercato su it.wikipedia basandomi sull'interwiki di en.wikipedia. Per esempio "balloonist" non aveva "mongolfierista" che poi è una parola che conosco. Il punto è.. che ti ringrazio anche per il resto. Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Monument of Nizami Ganjavi

Buongiorno, Pierpao. I'm user from Azerbaijan. The last year in your city, in your beautiful city was erected a monument of a very famous Azerbaijani poet Nizami Ganjavi. This monument was erected in Villa Borghese park (in Viale Madama Letizia). Could you make a photo of this monument and upload it to the Commons? Grazie per il vostro tempo)) --Interfase (talk) 16:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Nuvola icon categorization

Hello! Was this second edit accidental? An SVG version is linked from the description. —David Levy 15:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes I really wonder what you are doing? Apart from a number of PNG who already have a SVG.[6] Why the category "modified" is obsolet? Should it be deleted? Why you create Category:Nuvola PNG icons? What meaning has this category? another small mistake Is there a evidence to this: “All SVG versions of Nuvola icons are modified, so they should be categorized under Category:Nuvola SVG icons, not here, as their status as "modified" is implied by not being a PNG.”? All identical GNOME icons are modified? Sorry about that, but this is questionable and should be mentioned on the Commons:Project Nuvola 2.0+!? -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ ℗ 13:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Pierpao, sorry for my late answer. That sentence is written at top of Category: Modified Nuvola icons, so they is now empty!? This simply means that all these SVG are not originals!? -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ ℗ 14:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Per favore prendi ASSOLUTAMENTE visione di questa discussione

Ciao perdonami se mi permetto (e se lo metto così in evidenza) ma per favore devi assolutamente prendere visione di questa discussione, bisogna fare qualcosa altrimenti si cancelleranno moltissime immagini Commons:Bar_italiano#Campagna_di_cancellazione_per_il_NO-FOP_Italy_.28_.C3.A8_fatta_molto_male.29. Ho spiegato per bene perché le immagini non devono venir cancellate, ma l'utente né mi ascolta né partecipa alla discussione --Pava (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:People with black skin

Do you want to state you agree with deleting this category? if you do, please type in Support or Delete as your comment. grazi.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

undeletion request

Ciao :) vista la tua esperienza con la licenza delle immagini e la loro correttezza, puoi dire il tuo parere tecnico su questa discussione? Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:.22_13_-_ITALY_-_monuments_of_Milan_in_art_-_marking_pen_drawings_colored_by_children_-_Teatro_alla_Scala.jpg_.E2.80.8E. Grazie mille ciao --Pava (talk) 19:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

[[Media:]]

Please index subcategories correctly

Hello. Please use capital letters for the sorting variables that appear after the "|": xxx|Flowers and not xxx|flowers. Men and Women (or Males and Females) are top-indexed together in gender-specific subcategories: xxx| Female and not xxx|Female. Thank you. Orrlingtalk 13:28, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Wilhelmine von Hessen-Kassel (renaming)

What you mean when renaming is Electress Wilhelmine Caroline von Hessen-Kassel (Princess of Denmark). The Files mean Wilhelmine von Hessen-Kassel, a Prussian princess. The original file name was short, but not wrong. „Hofdame“ means „court lady“ (gentildonna?). However, the attribution to Wilhelmine von Hessen-Kassel not seem to be clear. See also my references in this file. Wilhelmine was the women of Heinrich von Preussen, the young brother of Friedrich II. (Federico II). Therefore, she was named „Prinzessin Heinrich von Preussen“. --Botaurus (talk) 09:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

My mistake. Your references are good. Anyway I renamed this picture because its title was not correct and this File:Kreis_des_Antoine_Pesne_-_Bildnis_einer_unbekannten_Frau.jpg that is another version of the same picture with a similar title. Moreover in the description was specified "unknown lady". Thanks for your correction--Pierpao.lo (listening) 23:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I've replied to you

on User talk:Orrling#Category:Black and white photographs of women. Orrlingtalk 11:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop creating "Females" categories

Please don't create any more "Females" categories when there's a "Women" category of the same topic with marginal differences (as in the arts). I've commented for you on this matter elaborately on my tlakpage here, so, as long as we're still discussing this issue please avoid creating more duplicate categories by splitting "Women" and "Females". Thanks, Orrlingtalk 15:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)