User talk:Rave: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:02, 16 August 2011

Добро пожаловать в Commons, Alex Rave!

Первые шаги Справочные страницы руководства по первых шагам и ЧАВО помогут Вам после регистрации. В них объясняется, как настроить интерфейс (например, язык), как загружать файлы, а также наши базовые правила в области соблюдения авторских прав. Вам не нужны специальные технические навыки, чтобы участвовать в проекте. Действуйте смело и предполагайте добрые намерения со стороны других участников и участниц. Вики — это действительно просто. Как получить помощь Много полезной информации доступно на Портале сообщества. Вы можете задавать вопросы на Help desk, Форуме или канале IRC #wikimedia-commons. Вы также можете связаться с администраторами на их страницах обсуждений. Если у вас есть специфичный вопрос об авторских правах, задайте его на Commons talk:Licensing.		Инструменты и подсказки Поместите информационный блок Вавилона на Вашу страницу участника, чтобы другие могли узнать о языках, которыми Вы владеете, а также расскажите о Ваших навыках в области компьютерной графики; Все загруженные Вами файлы хранятся в Вашей персональной галерее; Пожалуйста, подписывайтесь на страницах голосований и обсуждений с помощью ~~~~; Используйте CommonSense для поиска подходящих категорий для Ваших файлов (чтобы другие тоже могли их найти!); Для ссылки на страницу описания изображения используйте: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, это выглядит как: `Image:Foo.jpg`; Если вы копируете файлы из другого проекта, пожалуйста, используйте CommonsHelper. Сделали ошибку? Вы хотите изменить описание? Не нужно загружать файл заново, просто нажмите ссылку "Править" наверху страницы изображения; Вы хотите переименовать или переместить файл? Просто загрузите файл снова и пометьте старый следующим образом: `{{bad name\|Правильное название}}`; Более подробную информацию можно прочитать в Правилах удаления.
(P.S. Может, вы хотите поделиться своим мнением об этом сообщении?)

—dima/s-ko/ 19:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Polezhayevskaya_table.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Polezhayevskaya_table.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Alex Rave 20:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Submarine Vepr by Ilya Kurganov.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Submarine Vepr by Ilya Kurganov.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Panther 06:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Не указан автор. Нет разрешения на поставленную лицензию. Разрешения "для Википедии" не подходит, нужно более общее.

Image Tagging Image:U-forelle.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:U-forelle.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Code·is·poetry 20:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is noted, that author is unknown. This boat decomissioned more than 100 years ago, so author is already dead in any case ands it's PD-old. This photo is made in Russian Empire, so it's PD-RusEmpire. This photo was moved from de.wiki and it is noted too. In de.wiki this photo haven't source, so i can't add information about it. I consider, that it's scan from book. --Alex Rave 20:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:U-forelle.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:U-forelle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Code·is·poetry 09:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Xia or Jin

Hi Alex, are you sure about this. Though there are discrepancies to other pictures of the Jin (e.g. the hight of the VLS-tubes compared to the sail), it is highly unlikely that there are two Xia on the picture. If China launched two at all, it is believed that one sunk. Strong hints are the rows of holes to vent the tubes. Each photo of a Xia shows 4 rows along the tubes, each picture of a Jin, including this, only 3 --schlendrian •λ• 14:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen only one photo of project 094 Jin made by commercial satellite Quickbird. In this article there is comparsion of project 092 Xia and project 094 Jin submarines. Look and compare to Image:2 Type 094 submarines.jpg. What do you think about that? --Alex Rave 14:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In enwiki there is information for at least 2 submarines comissioned. In book about nuclear submarines i've seen number "~5". So, "2 and 1 sunk" is not for sure. --Alex Rave 14:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

there are a couple of pictures of the Jin, see http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/china/type_94-pics.htm. Coming to "2 and one sunk", I was talking about the Xia aka Type 092, which you think the subs on the picture here to be. en.wiki lists only 1 completed, though there are two one this picture. Which is why I think this cannot be a Xia --schlendrian •λ• 20:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that some of these images are wrong: there are versions with 12, 14, 16 rocket tubes... And none of these photos is look like that bad-quality satellite photo. Knowing situation about secrets in China i apologise, that some photos could be considered as Jin by desinformation or mistake. What we have: in China there are 2 types oа SSBN: Xia was made from Xan-type and has same bow and sail shape as Xan and 12 nuclear missiles. Type Jin was made later and Jin is in the 2nd generation of chinese nuclear subs. So, it just haven't look similar with Xia. Comparing "Jin" and "xia" i don't see any differences except 3 and 4 rows of "shpigate" holes. This difference can be explained by modification. It seems that "Jin" has bigger hunch but i'm not sure about that. It might be Jin or jist another Xia. The longer i look at different photos, the less i understand. So. Do what you want, i don't know the truth and i only have my own opinion that easily may be wrong. But boat from satellite is neither "Jin" nor "Xia" then. --Alex Rave 21:50, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow tower inside.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Harsh light on some of the white bars, but given the subject I imagine it's pretty much inevitable. Good symmetry. Arria Belli 23:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Soviet S-1 sea trials 1936.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Soviet S-1 sea trials 1936.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Levg 11:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HSK Stier as Cairo.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:HSK Stier as Cairo.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-D.W. (talk) 18:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:HSK_Atlantis.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HSK_Atlantis.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lokal _Profil 00:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link to source is exist at image page (http://www.de1939a1945.bravepages.com/casos/009yama01.htm). I know, that if author is unknown, that date of first publication is needed. But it seems impossible for me to check this. So you may delete this image freely. BTW such problems may exist with other images, uploaded by me. --Alex Rave (talk) 18:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look

Hi. Have a look at User talk:Giggy#Alex Rave -- Rave, I was talking about you. →Spiritia 07:01, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you very much! --Alex Rave (talk) 13:23, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you now have bg:User:Rave, too. Enjoy ;-) →Spiritia 20:59, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oh, i see. Thank you very much! --Rave (talk) 21:12, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, you now have to visit your home wiki, click on ru:Special:MergeAccount and attach your newly obtained accounts on Commons and BG WP (and elsewhere, if you have other successful usurpations). Otherwise thy won't be attached automatically. Cheers, →Spiritia 21:44, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:) Already done, as you see. --Rave (talk) 21:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:U-47 raid (ru).svg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 18:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Akula_class_submarine_stern_view.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Akula_class_submarine_stern_view.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 22:10, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Rave (talk) 22:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kievskaya-Koltsevaya soldat.jpg

File:Kievskaya-Koltsevaya soldat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--sугсго 11:12, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Akula

Hi Rave. As far as I know, starboard and port-side of Akula-class submarines are not identical. So if you do something like this[1] you have to move the sensorantennas and sensorpods (point 3 in this graphic [2]) to the other side side of the ship. With best regards Alexpl (talk) 07:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Rave!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gluecksklee (transparent background).png was uncategorized on 1 October 2009.
Image:Kuchumov Andrei with his childrens.JPG was uncategorized on 15 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Columba white.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Korall 19:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jarosh otakar.jpg

Autotranslate|1=File:Jarosh otakar.jpg|base=Copyvionote -- Aleksb1 (talk) 19:32, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Не хотел на быстрое удаление, вынудили. Аноним вставляет это фото в список Героев иностранцев, причём альтернатива там с марки имеется. в любом случае сейчас лицензию не подберёшь. Загрузим по свободной после 2014)). -- Aleksb1 (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

А ОТРС-разрешение Н. Уфаркина только на текст распространяется? --Rave (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Отбой. Перелецинзировали по PD-Ukraine. Да, ОТРС, только текст, по сути он не может быть правообладателем всех фотографий Героев. -- Aleksb1 (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PD-UA просто жжот. --Rave (talk) 18:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for a drawing

Hello Rave!

I have noticed your delightful drawings of submarines. Thanks for contributing them to Commons.

I have one request: Can you draw an image of the russian Topol-M ballistic missile system for Commons? Our category here lacks of such an image. I think of a drawing like this.

Would be great to receive a positive answer of you.

Thanks in advance, High Contrast (talk) 10:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm sorry, but i'm not the author of files you meant. Please, talk to Mike1979 Russia. --Rave (talk) 20:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borey class SSBN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Sorry I didn't get to this image in time. Glad to see it was promoted though, definitely great work. Keep it up ! --ianaré (talk) 20:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but i'm only nominator, and author is Mike1979 Russia, he did great job already and he don't going to stop :). --Rave (talk) 20:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shadowgraph S-56 submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 20:43, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shadowgraph Kreiserskaya class submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 20:43, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel II class SSBN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. All this drawings i saw as VI candidates --George Chernilevsky 16:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yankee class SSBN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 16:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yankee II class SSBN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 16:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta I class SSBN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 16:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta II class SSBN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 16:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta III class SSBN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 16:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta IV class SSBN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 16:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Typhoon class SSBN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 16:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Soviet ballistic missile submarine classes.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Soviet ballistic missile submarine classes.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 21:07, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warsaw

old french proverb : Triangle removed, photo promoted ! . Regards, --Jebulon (talk) 20:51, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Rave (talk) 02:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PushkinMskVblizi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. Geocode would be very useful! --Jovianeye 17:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

QI

	Hello, Rave. You have new messages at George Chernilevsky's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:48, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 20:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arms of Ireland

Here: http://travel.webshots.com/photo/1242734181063514536DWscHk

Sodacan (talk) 18:58, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Alexander Pushkin by Alexander Opekushin (Moscow).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Comment - I wonder if the so named scope is too broad or not because while browsing the categories under this scope name I found some other interesting monuments to Pushkin. I don't say that every statue needs own scope but what if we narrow a bit the area and call it Statues of Pushkin in Moscow. Let's see what others think.--MrPanyGoff 20:34, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry, I beg to disagree : in my opinion, a scope "Statue of [any poet]" is not a too narrow, unless it is masterpiece work of art. Same argument as in this other former VIC. If we consider the statue as a piece of art by itself, the sculptor must be know then and noted in the description -isn't it Alexander Mikhailovich Opekushin here?- and the scope adjusted, for instance "Statue of xxx by yyy" -> an example there.--Myrabella (talk) 12:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. To summarize - we have three possibilities of interpretation when it comes to a statue, depending on the relation of the scope with the topic lists (galeries): 1) If we refer the scope to section People considering the statue as a portrait then the scope should be named after the man it represents - in this case: Alexander Pushkin. (we already have photos of statues as portraits) 2) If we refer the scope to section Works of art considering the statue as a piece of art (meaning sculpture or architecture) then the scope should be named: Statue of Pushkin by XXX. 3) If we refer the scope to section Places considering the statue as a memorial-monument (meaning a landmark of some place) then the scope should be named: Statue of Pushkin, Town or better Monument to Pushkin, Town . Of course when some image obtain own scope in 2) or 3) it has to be a notable sculpture and respectively notable monument. I think that the nominator here doesn't mean 1) so the question here is: a Place or Work of art. Both are OK, imo.--MrPanyGoff 16:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request We could mix 2) and 3) in that precise case, with a scope worded like this : "Monument to Alexander Pushkin by Alexander Opekushin (Moscow)". There is an article on Ukrainian Wikipedia and on Russian WP. Then I invite the nominator to change the scope, and to complete the description, mentioning the sculptor and the date of the sculpture. --Myrabella (talk) 20:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Info Done. --Rave (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support OK to me for this QI giving a good view of this nonument nowadays. Best in scope, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 21:34, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Выгрузка БД ОКН

Там что-то не так. По Московской области сайт даёт 4540 титулов, в выгрузке - 3838. Из того, что знаю, - Павловский Посад, к примеру, выгружен полностью, а по Ногинску (включая деревни в составе МО ГП Ногинск) - 58 титулов из 73. Помимо памятников советской постройки (понятно), отсутствует комплекс Глуховской мануфактуры (5000780000-5000781007, в реестре с 1990).

Ещё удивило отстутствие многих, но не всех, селищ и городищ (вообще категория "памятники археологии") - в Кашире и Каширском районе их шесть, в списке - нет - вы их чистили? Если да, то многие "просочились".

NVO (talk) 10:37, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

А, кстати, нет ли уже здесь (или в планах) чего-то вроде {{Объект культурного наследия}} ? А то вот так неуклюже выглядит. NVO (talk) 14:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
С позволения Рейва, отвечу я: база была автоматически вытащена Haffman по моему запросу с сайта http://kulturnoe-nasledie.ru, официального такого источника, и она ужасна. В ней есть культурные объекты, которые относятся, по базе, к несуществующему уже региону; адреса неполны; есть среди находок памятник Ленину, датируемый XVIII веком; и так далее. Лучшего ничего не видно, увы. При этом из списка ничего не удаляли - просто разбили его по регионам да опубликовали.

Спасибо Вам за работу, которая ведётся с этой базой. У меня просто опустились руки, когда я в ней покопалась.

Владимира Медейко просила сделать запрос, нет ли чего-то более приличного у соответствующих органов, но не знаю, сделал ли он; да и согласна с Павлом Каганером насчёт того, что шансы на то, что существует лучшая база, довольно малы. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 10:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Что-либо всерьёз делать с федеральной базой, полагаю, можно только на микроуровне - см. например Павловский Посад. Объекты культурного наследия - и только в сторону сокращения списка (дом сгорел - вычёркиваем), а он по Посаду заведомо неполон. Вот эти пробелы на месте бесспорных памятников - как с ними быть? В городском музее мне называли цифру "около двухсот" титулов областного реестра (составленного ещё при Ц. Горохе) - а когда они в федеральный список попадут и попадут ли вообще... NVO (talk) 17:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Надо будет недели через две (после нашей конференции) всё-таки сделать запросы по областным администрациям. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 04:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 271: / Line 271: @@
 *: Владимира Медейко просила сделать запрос, нет ли чего-то более приличного у соответствующих органов, но не знаю, сделал ли он; да и согласна с Павлом Каганером насчёт того, что шансы на то, что существует лучшая база, довольно малы. [[user:Lvova|Анастасия Львова]]<sup>[[:ru:User:Lvova|ru]]</sup> <small>([[User_talk:Lvova|ru-n, en-2]])</small> 10:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 *:: Что-либо всерьёз делать с федеральной базой, полагаю, можно только на микроуровне - см. например [[Павловский Посад. Объекты культурного наследия]] - и только в сторону сокращения списка (дом сгорел - вычёркиваем), а он по Посаду заведомо неполон. Вот эти пробелы на месте бесспорных памятников - как с ними быть? В городском музее мне называли цифру "около двухсот" титулов областного реестра (составленного ещё при Ц. Горохе) - а когда они в федеральный список попадут и попадут ли вообще... [[User:NVO|NVO]] ([[User talk:NVO|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
+*::: Надо будет недели через две (после нашей конференции) всё-таки сделать запросы по областным администрациям. [[user:Lvova|Анастасия Львова]]<sup>[[:ru:User:Lvova|ru]]</sup> <small>([[User_talk:Lvova|ru-n, en-2]])</small> 04:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Rave: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:02, 16 August 2011

Contents

Image:Polezhayevskaya_table.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Submarine Vepr by Ilya Kurganov.jpg

Image Tagging Image:U-forelle.jpg

Image:U-forelle.jpg

Xia or Jin

Quality Image Promotion

Image Tagging Image:Soviet S-1 sea trials 1936.jpg

Image:HSK Stier as Cairo.jpg

Image Tagging Image:HSK_Atlantis.jpg

Have a look

Image:U-47 raid (ru).svg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Akula_class_submarine_stern_view.jpg

File:Kievskaya-Koltsevaya soldat.jpg

Akula

Tip: Categorizing images

Quality Image Promotion

File:Jarosh otakar.jpg

Request for a drawing

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Set Promotion

Warsaw

Quality Image Promotion

QI

Notification about possible deletion

Arms of Ireland

Valued Image Promotion

Выгрузка БД ОКН

Navigation menu

User talk:Rave: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:02, 16 August 2011

Image:Polezhayevskaya_table.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Submarine Vepr by Ilya Kurganov.jpg

Image Tagging Image:U-forelle.jpg

Image:U-forelle.jpg

Xia or Jin

Quality Image Promotion

Image Tagging Image:Soviet S-1 sea trials 1936.jpg

Image:HSK Stier as Cairo.jpg

Image Tagging Image:HSK_Atlantis.jpg

Have a look

Image:U-47 raid (ru).svg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Akula_class_submarine_stern_view.jpg

File:Kievskaya-Koltsevaya soldat.jpg

Akula

Tip: Categorizing images

Quality Image Promotion

File:Jarosh otakar.jpg

Request for a drawing

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Set Promotion

Warsaw

Quality Image Promotion

QI

Notification about possible deletion

Arms of Ireland

Valued Image Promotion

Выгрузка БД ОКН

Navigation menu

Search