User talk:Gerold Rosenberg

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gerold Rosenberg!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 18:06, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Dalhausen (Ansicht von Osten).jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Odenhausen Kirche (Hinweistafel).JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Odenhausen Kirche (Hinweistafel).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Höfe (Dreihausen) (1).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Höfe (Dreihausen) (1).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 01:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pages using Information template with syntax errors

Hallo Gerold. Bitte korrigiere die Syntaxfehler in deinen Uploads. --Leyo 21:56, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Mach ich! -- Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 22:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Treysa (Schwalmstadt) - Privatbrauerei Friedrich Haaß (1).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Treysa (Schwalmstadt) - Privatbrauerei Friedrich Haaß (1).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

erledigt. -- Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 11:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grünberg (Hessen) - Warte (1).jpg

And also:

Hi Gerold Rosenberg. Diese Uploads von dir befinden sich in Category:Language templates with no text displayed. Bitte korrigiere die Dateibeschreibungsseiten entsprechend. Leyo 11:41, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - Erledigt - sind nun aus Category:Language templates with no text displayed draussen. -- Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 12:07, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Gerold

Ich habe mir das nebenstehende Bild von Dir angeschaut, man hätte es bei diesen Lichtverhältnissen und dem Kontrast (Schatten) kaum anders machen können. Auch hier und erst recht hier nicht, da hat dir einerseits die Wolke einen Strich durch die Rechnung gemacht (Wald im Hintergrund), andererseits der logische Kontrast zwischen dem sonnenbeschienenen Haus und dem dunklen Vordergrund. Hättest du es jedoch mit RAW abgespeichert (was ja deine Kamera beherrscht), dann wären die Informationen noch vorhanden gewesen und du hättest es locker perfektionieren können. Du hattest ja auch einen perfekten Fototag, was man an den anderen Bildern ja sieht! Mit Jpg verlässt das Bild den Weg Richtung Speicherkarte mit sehr hohem Verlust, dazu noch einer kamerainternen Verarbeitung, welche du nicht beeinflussen kannst (außer mit den Motivprogrammen). Was man aber einmal verloren hat, kann man nicht wieder zurückholen. Um Raw weiterzuverarbeiten benötigt es aber ein Programm wie Lightroom (kostenpflichtig) oder RawTherapee (kostenlos, allerdings nicht so komfortabel), mit dem du Raw-Bilder bearbeiten und danach in JPG umwandeln kannst. Nur als Hinweis. Ich hab dir zwei Extreme dazugestellt, anhand derer du sehen kannst, was man noch rausholen kann. Im Falle der Überbelichtung sieht man das besonders gut am Himmel, das Ergebnis ist akzeptabel (ein Problem, welchem man aber sehr oft begegnet), bei der Unterbelichtung (hervorgerufen durch die Aufnahme direkt Richtung Himmel) ist es noch extremer, allerdings wird das kaum verwendbar sein, das Farbrauschen ist einfach zu stark. Aber es zeigt, was alles in den Raw-Bildern in Wirklichkeit noch drinnen steckt. Und damit macht fotografieren noch mehr Spaß, speziell wenn man mit Lightroom noch eine hervorragende Verwaltungssoftware zur Verarbeitung vieler Bilder gleich dazu bekommt. Das ist leider der größte Mangel bei RawTherapee.

Ansonsten, wirklich gute Fotos, ich denke dass du das 18-55er Zoom draufhattest. Quasi die aktuell leichteste DSLR-Kombination am Markt. Schnuckelig! Ich denke, du hast Freude dran, man merkt das auch an deiner Experimentierfreudigkeit mit den Panoramen. Bitte fasse meine Anmerkunken nicht als Belehrung auf sondern als Interesse an deiner Arbeit.

Gruß aus Wien --Hubertl (talk) 17:24, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe dir ja schon einiges per Mail geschrieben. Hier nochmal ganz herzlichen Dank für Tipps, Kritik und Blumen. Wie du an den EXIF Daten gesehen hast, bin ich mit der Canon 100d unterwegs. Genau aus dem Grund den du vermutest: sie ist so wunderbar leicht. Alle Fotomtive die ich abgelichtet habe wurden mit Öffentlichen Verkehrsmitteln und per pedes erreicht. Da freut es einen wenns leicht ist. Das Ojkt. ist ein Cannon 18-135 Zoom. -- Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 19:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Diebstrum (Grünberg)

Hallo, Du hast in o. g. Kategorie einen Baustein gesetzt, der die Löschung verhindert. Ist das Absicht? Oder wolltest Du eigentlich einen Category Redirect auf Category:Diebsturm (Grünberg) erreichen? Viele Grüße, --Rudolph Buch (talk) 11:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, habe nun {{Category renamed|Diebsturm (Grünberg)}} in die "Tippfehlerkategorie" eingetragen. Hoffe so ist es korrekt. --Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 13:14, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Railway lines in Mittelhessen

Hallo, Du hast o.g. Kategorie angelegt. Im Grundsatz schätze ich eine Bündelung durch Kategorien auf der Regionsebene. Hier würde ich mich jedoch gegen eine Untergliederung von „Railway lines in Hesse“ aussprechen. Warum? Die allermeisten Zuglinien verlaufen nicht nur in Mittelhessen. Beispiel: sowohl Obere Lahntalbahn‎ als auch Vogelsbergbahn‎ verlassen (Mittel)hessen und müssten folgerichtig mindestens „eins drüber“ einsortiert werden. Ich empfehle aus diesem Grund eine Auflösung der Kategorie. Grüße, --Emha (talk) 11:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bei der Methode die ich eingeschlagen habe muss man konsequenterweise die Kats "Railway lines in Nordhessen" und "Railway lines in Südhessen" anlegen. Eine Bahnstecke käme dann in ein bis max. drei Kats. Sauber strukturiert ist es dann! Ob man es gut findet ist dann mehr Geschmackssache. Wenn du es Rückgängig machen willst (incl. Löschen der Kat.) werde ich keinen Protest einlegen (selbst mach ich es aber auch nicht). -- Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 12:18, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nö. Wenn Du das für alle Regionen machen willst, Dir eine konsistente Struktur überlegt hast und das konsequent durchziehst, dann nur zu. --Emha (talk) 12:32, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Category:Railway lines in Nordhessen und Category:Railway lines in Südhessen habe ich in Category:Railway lines in Hesse bisher noch nicht entdecken können. Hast Du das noch auf dem Schirm? Viele Grüße, --Emha (talk) 07:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former_Members_of_Alternative_für_Deutschland

Former Members of Alternative für Deutschland has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Rudolph Buch (talk) 22:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinkershausen - Mühle Nispel (001).JPG

Hallo, das Bild ist von Dir, nehme ich an? Der Beschreibungsseite fehlen Urheber und Quelle. Viele Grüße und Danke für Deine Fotos, --Emha (talk) 13:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gefehlt haben schließende Klammern bei Vorlage:de ... habs erledigt. Danke! -- Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Reparatur - den Blick in den Quelltext habe ich versäumt. Viele Grüße, --Emha (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Emha: Es ist mein Bild und es waren meine Fehler ... da bist du nicht in der Pflicht in den Quelltext zu gucken wenn was nicht stimmt. Danke also in die Gegenrichtung. -- Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 22:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beschreibungen

Hallo Gerold! Vielen lieben Dank für deine vielen tollen Fotos aus Mittelhessen! Bin grade über die Bilder vom Bahnhof Kinzenbach gestolpert – toll! Darf ich dich bitten, bei künftigen Uploads die korrekte Beschreibung in die Vorlage zu schreiben? Vielen Dank! --Stefan ■ 12:34, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Blumen!

Du meinst sicher die Bilder der Category:Kinzenbach (Heuchelheim) - Bahnhof. Nun, ich bemühe mich wirklich, alles rund um meine Bilder informativ zu halten. Zu allererst versuche ich, Bildausschnitt und Perspektive so zu wählen, dass das Bild eine eigene Aussage hat. Weiter versuche ich, einen aussagekräftigen Dateinamen zu verwenden. Dann versuche ich indirekt über die Kategoriesierung Information zu verpacken. Praktisch alle meine Bilder sind vorortet (GPS) damit der Betrachter schnell den Ort finden kann (eine der wichtigsten Infos). Sehr oft stelle ich Kontext zwischen Bildern her indem ich sie maussensitiv mache (erst gestern hat sich User:Hydro für diesen Edit bedankt, in dem ich sein Bild mit meinem verknüpft habe und beiden Bildern damit Information gab (hallo Hydro - ich lasse es mir nicht zur Gewohnheit werden, das Danke-Verhalten ungefragt auszuplaudern ... hier lag es einfach nahe)). Nicht zuletzt versuche ich auch, durch "Bildreihen" Information zu geben. Das der Bahnhof heute ein Museum ist, kann man File:Kinzenbach (Heuchelheim) - Bahnhof (002).JPG entnehmen (mehr Sinn als die Bereitstellung dieser Information hat das Bild nicht).

Im übrigen stecke ich auch viel Arbeit in die "Nachkategoriesierung" der Bilder anderer Fotografen. Auch da haben sich einge via Dankefunktion erkenntlich gezeigt.

Ich weiß bei besten Willen nicht, welche Information ich noch hinzufügen könnte, die nicht ohnehin offensichtlich sind oder mit einem Klick "recherchiert" werden können.

Und wenn ich Inforamtionen in die Bildbeschreibung einarbeiten würde die ohnehin offensichtlich sind, machte es mit nur Arbeit die in keinem Verhältnis zum Nutzen steht (anders formuliert: ich stecke die Arbeit genau dort hinein, wo Infos meiner Meinung nach am besten zugägnlich sind).

Aber vielleicht reden wir ja auch aneinander vorbei. Wenn du mit meiner Antwort nicht zufrieden bist, kannst du ja einfach mal die Bildbeschreibungen der Bilder in Kat. "Kinzenbach (Heuchelheim) - Bahnhof" in deinem Sinne ändern. Manchmal kann man durch Praxis am deutlichsten zeigen was man möchte. -- Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 13:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: erst nachdem ich schrieb, das du in den Bildern zur Demonstration editieren solltest, habe ich gesehen, das du genau das gemacht hast. Ich habe mir das Bsp. File:Kinzenbach (Heuchelheim) - Bahnhof (007).JPG angesehen. Dort war von mir eingetragen: „Deutsch: Siehe Foto, Dateiname, Kategorien u. ggf. Geo-Koordinaten“. Du hast es geändert in „Deutsch: Museumszug am Bahnhof Kinzenbach, Heuchelheim“.

Ich habe nicht die geringsten Einwände gegen die Edits. Gerne darfst du es auch in vielen Sprachen ergänzen. Aber in mein Hochladeprozedere passt es beim besten Willen nicht rein. Dafür werde ich mir keine Zeit nehmen. Nichts für ungut! -- Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 14:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Gerold, Du schreibst "Weiter versuche ich, einen aussagekräftigen Dateinamen zu verwenden". Das finde ich gut.
Der Inhalt im Beschreibung/Description-Feld lautet standardmäßig {{de|Siehe Bild und Dateiname}}. Was hältst Du denn davon, ganz einfach den Dateinamen dort hinein zu kopieren?
Am Beispiel: File:Hunburg (Burgholz) (0001).JPG, dort fände ich "Hunburg (Burgholz)" allemal aussagekräftiger als "Siehe Bild und Dateiname". Nur als Anregung, denn den Dateinamen vergibst Du ja eh im Uploadformular, da wäre es m.E. kein Aufwand in Deinem Hochladeprozedere, diesen Inhalt auch in das Beschreibungsfeld zu schreiben, oder? Viele Grüße, --Emha (talk) 15:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emha, im Prinzip kann ich nur das oben Gesagte wiederholen: ich habe einen ganzen Haufen von Miniprogrämmchen, die mir helfen meine Upload mehr oder weniger automatisch ablaufen zu lassen. Je nach Anlass (Anzahl der Bilder?; gibt es schon Bilder wo der Zähler hochgesetzt werden soll?, ...) kommt ein anderes Set von Progrämmelchen zum Einsatz. Das Ganze kann ich kaum erklären (oder ich bräuchte Sprüche wie „der Schuster hat die schlimmsten Schuhe“ und/oder "das Genie beherrscht das Chaos".

Wäre es einfach, würde ich sofort der Dateinamen in die Bildbeschreibung übernehmen. Und sollte ich mein Uploadchaos mal generalüberholen, werde ich den Wunsch berücksichtigen.

Nebenbei lege ich großen Wert auf beschreibende Dateinamen. Ich denke, dass das sehr sinnvoll ist. Spätestens seit du in User:Emha/Mittelhessen auf die Anzeige von Dateinamen umgestellt hast, wirst du wissen wie sinnvoll beschreibende Dateinamen sind.

Nebenbei greife ich hin und wieder auch richtig in die Scheiße beim Dateinamen. Dateileichen wie File:Gespenstkopf (Biebertal) (001).JPG (auch ich sehe gelegentlich Gespenster wo keine sind) kriegt man nur mit „einem Antrag auf Erteilung eines Antragformulars ...“ weg ...

Apropos Dateiname in Galerien von neuen Dateien: wenn du auf die Schnelle heraus findest, wie man die Galerien in den Dateiname-Anzeigemodus umstellt, dann ändere es doch bitte bei User:Wikiwal/Category:Pipe organs in Germany (natürlich mußt du wikiwal fragen ... aber ich denke er wird es gut finden). --Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 17:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weilburg - Historische Wasserversorgung (004).JPG

File:Weilburg - Historische Wasserversorgung (004).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo of a copyrighted work, non de minimmis aplies here

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ezarateesteban 21:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Johanneskirche Gießen (1).jpg

And also:

File:Johanneskirche Gießen (2).jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Martinskirche Dautphe 027.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Gerold Rosenberg

Contents

File:Dalhausen (Ansicht von Osten).jpg

Copyright status: File:Odenhausen Kirche (Hinweistafel).JPG

Copyright status: File:Höfe (Dreihausen) (1).jpg

Autopatrol given

Category:Pages using Information template with syntax errors

Copyright status: File:Treysa (Schwalmstadt) - Privatbrauerei Friedrich Haaß (1).jpg

File:Grünberg (Hessen) - Warte (1).jpg

Hallo Gerold

Category:Diebstrum (Grünberg)

Category:Railway lines in Mittelhessen

Category:Former_Members_of_Alternative_für_Deutschland

File:Sinkershausen - Mühle Nispel (001).JPG

Beschreibungen

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

File:Weilburg - Historische Wasserversorgung (004).JPG

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

User talk:Gerold Rosenberg

Copyright status: File:Odenhausen Kirche (Hinweistafel).JPG

Copyright status: File:Höfe (Dreihausen) (1).jpg

Autopatrol given

Copyright status: File:Treysa (Schwalmstadt) - Privatbrauerei Friedrich Haaß (1).jpg

Hallo Gerold

Beschreibungen

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search