共享資源:管理员
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP
此页解释了管理员(有时叫做admins或者sysops)在维基共享资源上的职责。请注意,此职务的的细节,以及授予管理员权限的方式,可能与其他项目不同。
如果你需要管理员的帮助,请移步管理员公告板。
现时在维基共享资源上有179 名管理员。
什么是管理员?
Administrators as of 9月 2024 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 179
If 179 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
技术
技术上,管理员在维基共享资源上有以下权限:
- 删除和还原图像及其他上传的文件,并可浏览和恢复已删除的版本。
- 删除和还原页面,并可浏览和恢复已删除的版本。
- 保护页面和解除对页面的保护,并可编辑保护级别为“仅允许管理员”的页面。
- 封禁和解封用户,进行IP地址(或IP段)的封禁。
- 編輯沒有太多限制的的界面訊息(參見界面管理員)
- 重命名文件。
- 添加和删除用户组。
- 配置上载向导。
- 彻底删除和还原特定页面的日志和历史版本。
- 从其他项目导入页面。
- 合并页面历史。
- 修改防滥用过滤器。
- 移动页面时不创建来源页面的重定向。
- 无视欺诈检查。
- 一次将一条消息发送给多个用户。(群发消息)
- 在API查询中使用更高的上限。
这些统称为管理工具。
社群角色
管理員是維基共享資源社群內有經驗的可信用戶,負責進階維護工作並且經公眾討論或投票已獲授權使用管理工具。不同的管理員有著不同的興趣和專長,但典型的管理員任務包括決策並關閉刪除請求、刪除版權違規、必要時恢復檔案、反破壞保護維基共享資源以及在模板和其他受保護頁面上作業。當然,其中有些工作也可以由非管理員完成。
管理員被期望瞭解是項目的目標,並準備著與其餘有志人士一同做出建設性的貢獻。管理員理應瞭解並遵守指引政策,在合理時尊重社群共識。
除去需要使用管理工具的時候,管理員由於個人立場不同並無特殊編輯權限,在討論或公開投票內,他們的貢獻被看作與其餘任一普通編者相同。一些管理員可能會變得更有影響力,這不是因為他們的管理員地位,而是因為他們從社群中獲得了對其個人的信任。
對管理員的建議
請詳閱管理員手冊。
移除管理员权限
根据管理员离任方针,如果管理员不活跃或者滥用管理工具,权限会被解除。 在管理员解任请求中,不适用参选管理员时判断共识的标准。而应当是使用“多数共识”,即超过50%的用户达成解任共识即可解任管理员。
申請成為管理員
所有有意願成為管理員的使用者必須經過這個過程,自薦至申請成為管理人員,包括那些想重新上任的前任管理員。
首先,前往Commons:Administrators/Howto並閱讀那裏的資訊。隨後返回並在下方的段落遞交申請。
- 點擊正確的按鈕並建立子頁面後,複製鏈接到子頁面。例如,"Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", 將 Commons:Administrators/Requests 粘貼到文段最頂部, 然後用兩個括弧包围起來 (例如 {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}} )以嵌入。可以在MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice上申请一个全站监视列表通知,或者如果你是管理员,可以编辑MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice张贴通知。
- 如果他人提名閣下,請以陳述「我同意(I accept)」或是其餘類似字樣來接受,並在提名下方簽名。子頁面仍然需要被您或是您的提名人嵌入。
使用下方的方框,並將"Username"替換成您的用戶名。 |
投票
任一註冊用戶都可以在這投票,不过那些很少甚至沒有編輯過的人的票可能不會被計算在內。閣下最好在 Support或 Oppose時都給予理由,這能幫助行政員更好地做出决策。有支持理據的論證會比簡單的投票更被看重。
上任管理员通常需要75%的支持率,并至少需要有8人同意。来自未注册用户的投票将不被计入。不管怎样,关闭个案的行政员可以自行考虑社群共识,最终决定并不只基于原始数据。如果行政员认为需要更好地确定社区共识,可以酌情延长投票的时间。
由于需计算成功或失败率, Neutral投票将不被计入投票总数。然而,这些评论是讨论的一部分,并可能会说服其他人,还有助于关闭个案的行政员更好地了解社群共识。
清除缓存使用下方的编辑链接来编辑嵌入后的页面。
申请成为管理员
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Michel_Bakni (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth) (Activity: Talk Commons DR)
- Scheduled to end: 21:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Hey All,
My name is Michel BAKNI, I am originally from Arabic Wikipedia.
I have been active in the project for the last eight years, I am a file mover and a template editor for years with a clean record :).
My main contributions are related to Arabic content, with a vision to strengthen the link between Wikipedia, Wikipedia, and Commons.
I am aware of the multilingual nature of the project, which is why I need the admin rights in the first place: to facilitate the maintenance of Arabic content and to provide additional support to my main community, especially people who have problems related to content and do not master English. I also wish to handle vandalism in Arabic, a tough task for non-Arabic speakers.
I am not new to admin rights, I have been an admin in Arabic Wikipedia for more than 4 years now. I am familiar with admin actions: including protection, deleting, blocking etc.
I also speak English & French fluently, I do understand Spanish with difficulty in oral communication
I hope I will be a usufel addition to the Admin Team!--Michel Bakni (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Votes
- Oppose I went through your edits and got the impression that you don't quite understand the policies on Commons, especially COM:INUSE which automatically makes a file in scope. There was a few deletion requests started by you where the rationale was personal file, out of scope, but the file was in use. Also, you seem to use deletion requests for all your deletion nominations, whereas a majority could have been tagged with {{SD}} or {{Copyvio}}, instead, i.e. speedy deletions. Also, the reason to your admin request, to facilitate the maintenance of Arabic content and to provide additional support to my main community, especially people who have problems related to content and do not master English. I also wish to handle vandalism in Arabic, a tough task for non-Arabic speakers. does not need the admin tools.Jonteemil (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Regretfully Oppose per above. You will be fine in some time. Bedivere (talk) 23:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Bastique (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth) (Activity: Talk Commons DR)
- Scheduled to end: 21:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm not going to be wordy. I was a Commons Administrator for 12 years, from 2006 to 2018, when I lost the status because of inactivity. Much of that was my career and slowly growing apart from the Wikimedia projects in general. But in the last couple of years I've increased my involvement in the projects, helping when I've found the time. And I managed to bring myself to Wikimania this year in Katowice, reacquainting myself with the community and meeting a huge number of new people.
I was satisfied with just being a contributor and reviewer, however, I understand there is a huge backlog of things that need to be done, and I felt compelled to ask for the administrator rights again so I can better help with tasks here.
Plus, I am committed to not falling into inactivity again! Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 21:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Votes
- Support They know how to do the job, and we could definitely use the help. Abzeronow (talk) 21:56, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
👍 modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 23:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)- Support. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Welcome back. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 01:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Welcome back.-- Mohammed Qays 🗣 02:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support welcome back old friend Bedivere (talk) 03:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fit India 06:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Gnom (talk) 06:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support welcome back Gnangarra 08:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Waqar💬 08:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose All due respect for your work, but IMHO flag should be granted also with regard of more recent activity... but as for Commons namespace (most relevant for admin work) unfortunately I see far less than 100 edits of yours in the last two years, and why should I presume it would be so much more in future? Sorry --A.Savin 08:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- i agree with a.savin. your activity is low. please be more active. thanks. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Experienced editor. T CellsTalk 16:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose seems like hatcollecting, not much recent activity. Didn't the user also work for WMF, but that no longer? ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 20:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- this is their personal account, Bastique was an employee when being an active contributor was considered a requirement and staff werent expected to take actions as employees. Gnangarra 00:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see the need for the admin tools -- DaxServer (talk) 20:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose after checking his contributions, it is really low amount for recent years. i believe you should do more and apply here later. sorry. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 23:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support User has a long history with proof he'll be a good admin. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Welcome back! RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Also low admin activity is helpful and welcome. --Achim55 (talk) 09:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--RZuo (talk) 09:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Hadi (talk) 13:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support as I see no apparent issues and Commons does need more admins. Welcome back. EPIC (talk) 15:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, given that activity concerns will be addressed in future. Ratekreel (talk) 15:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Rather little recent activity on Commons --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:00, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Commons need more admins as it is a very backlogged project. If the user expects to become active again, and was an admin in the past, we should give them the toolbox. --A09 (talk) 18:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Welcome back to Commons, I have faith user will become more active again. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 20:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC) - Support Welcome back amigo! --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 21:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Any help is always appreciated, no matter how big or small. Jianhui67 T★C 06:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose too few contributions – increase activity here first and then request adminship, not the other way around...there's mountains of maintenance tasks here that can be done without admin rights. Per A.Savin. --Prototyperspective (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have over 14,500 contributions on Commons--so "too few contributions" is not a valid reason. See Gnangarra's statement below regarding Commons policy regarding re-adminship. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is a valid reason because 14,500 contributions isn't really much (albeit depending a lot on which kind of contributions you do) and, more importantly, because as a.savin said your recent contributions are low. I'd likely support if you get active first and then apply, why not spend a month or six contributing here as a normal user first? Agree with modern_primat that you should rather apply at another time. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Commons policy doesn't necessitate that I apply at another time when my recent contributions have stacked up to meet the original criteria for Administrator. Commons longstanding and stated policy is that "Administrators who have lost admin rights through inactivity but who expect to become active again may re-apply through the regular process". I was an administrator here for 14 years. I earned the community trust long ago. Re-adminship was never intended to be the inquisition it is on English Wikipedia. It was meant for those of us who have returned in good faith, once again able to take on the commitment of doing this entirely thankless job on Commons to do so. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 18:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'll also add that I only had 20k-30k edits here when I passed my RfA in 2023. Doing the job of sysop has definitely increased my edit count significantly. As I stated above, they know what they're doing, and I would definitely welcome any assistance they can provide. Abzeronow (talk) 17:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- I never said anything else – I just explained my vote instead of voting without rationale or not responding to questions. Of course you can apply right now but I don't think it's a good idea to make contributors admins with such low activity. You could fix it within a month of getting active during which you could also gain some experience with various WMC-related things and again I'm not saying one must do this just that I think one really should have contributed a reasonable amount to the site one is administering and also be relatively active in recent time.
- @Matrix: I simply don't see what the big problem with getting active first, for example by working on backlogs that don't require adminship. To answer your question, the point of that is necessary experience. In addition things like trust and showing how one interacts with controversial subjects etc. In 2021, 1674 WMC users had more edits and the vast majority of them do not have admin privileges. @Aafi: The point of looking at edits / activity is experience and commitment – because experience and commitment matter, edits do matter. And whether the user is more active on another project is relevant but not sufficient. Another issue probably is that working on maintenance backlog tasks is a neglected understaffed task class and that doing so drains contributor time away from other things they could contribute but even then the issue of low activity simply outweighs that because it can so easily be corrected by applying only after becoming active, not before. Prototyperspective (talk) 17:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- 14.5K contribs isn't much? I got adminship with ~7K contributions, 14.5K is more than enough. Their current activity level can be improved after they become admin, since they are a trusted user. What's the point waiting 'till they become active, just to then request admin? —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 12:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)- on this: I just had 5k+ edits when I became admin over here, and still have just over 7k edits. Adminship brings a lot of fruitful contribution, and if any former admin (who is aware of current trends) comes up to support, even if they have lesser edits than mine, but commit to supporting the project, I'd always be glad to drop a support. Edits matter less, experience and commitment matters more. Regards, Aafi (talk) 16:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Commons policy doesn't necessitate that I apply at another time when my recent contributions have stacked up to meet the original criteria for Administrator. Commons longstanding and stated policy is that "Administrators who have lost admin rights through inactivity but who expect to become active again may re-apply through the regular process". I was an administrator here for 14 years. I earned the community trust long ago. Re-adminship was never intended to be the inquisition it is on English Wikipedia. It was meant for those of us who have returned in good faith, once again able to take on the commitment of doing this entirely thankless job on Commons to do so. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 18:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is a valid reason because 14,500 contributions isn't really much (albeit depending a lot on which kind of contributions you do) and, more importantly, because as a.savin said your recent contributions are low. I'd likely support if you get active first and then apply, why not spend a month or six contributing here as a normal user first? Agree with modern_primat that you should rather apply at another time. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have over 14,500 contributions on Commons--so "too few contributions" is not a valid reason. See Gnangarra's statement below regarding Commons policy regarding re-adminship. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose kinda lazy bummer far less than 100 edits of yours in the last two years. Sorry, but motivation looks otherwise. --Mateus2019 (talk) 18:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not generally a huge fan of people with low edit counts becoming admins. I think the fact that Bastique already had the tools once and worked for the WMF at least shows they aren't going to botch the role up or anything. IMO a not very active admin who's experienced at the job and committed to contributing more is a lot better then nothing. There really needs to be more admins who go through the back logs, period. If Bastique just deals with a couple of DRs once in a while that will still be a huge improvement. More so if, or when, they are doing it on more of a full time basis. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Any help is always appreciated. Trusted user. Raymond (talk) 20:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Of course. High quality work going back a long, long way. Welcome back. Antandrus (talk) 21:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support What Raymond said. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Raymond. Regards, Aafi (talk) 05:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Long-time user, can be trusted to use the extra cleanup buttons well once more. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Their edit count may be low (only 1.45% of my total edits) but their experience is undoubtable. Wolverine XI 19:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Comments
- What backlogs would you be helping with as an administrator? Because there are lots of backlogs which ordinary editors can help to reduce, like subcategories of Category:Categories requiring diffusion, Category:Files needing categories and probably much more in Category:Commons maintenance. --JopkeB (talk) 08:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- This isnt english wikipedia as per COM:DEADMIN Administrators who have lost admin rights through inactivity but who expect to become active again may re-apply through the regular process. there is no inquisition required for admins returning after inactivity. The specified requirement is that they expect to become active. Gnangarra 09:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for the information, I did not know that. JopkeB (talk) 09:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- How many admin actions are you planning to perform per month? --GPSLeo (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- That really depends on the need at the time. I do not intend to quit reviewing pictures as I've been doing (the move to Commons backlog is 15 years), but probably admin actions are going to increase because of those. I'd definitely be working on the RFD files as well. That's where the job needs doing, isn't it? Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 22:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Do you realize that the current version of {{Nfd}} (as the autotranslated version of {{Delete}}) has required parameters?
Please apply themI applied a correction to special:diff/929621336 in special:diff/929894154, as you omitted reason, year, month, and day. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)- Well, you see, I knew this and was intending to get back and fix the edit, and it slipped my mind. 🫥 Thanks for catching that, Jeff. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 22:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you see, I knew this and was intending to get back and fix the edit, and it slipped my mind. 🫥 Thanks for catching that, Jeff. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 22:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
申请成为行政员
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
申请成为用户查核员
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
申请成为监督员
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.