Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citra (emulator)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:39, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citra (emulator)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software per WP:NSOFT. M. Caecilius (talk) 10:36, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:01, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant RS coverage of this software. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 10:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I did a lot of research, I am have been involved with emulation in the past and am fairly knowledgeable in this specific subject. In regards to emulators, RS in this niche topic, I believe, needs to be a little more lax. This emulator has barely been covered by in topic sources. To get to the point, this is not an emulator yet, it appears to be a work in progress and can barely run a few games. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 21:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.