Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Fjerstad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Miss South Dakota USA. Redirect is always preferred over deletion and consensus is to redirect the non-notables so closing as such (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 23:02, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Jessica Fjerstad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fjerstad was Miss South Dakota USA but that alone is not enough to make her notable. She is also a lawyer, but nothing indicates she is at all notable as a lawyer. John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. My sweeps turned up zilch.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:08, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Miss South Dakota USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America1000 17:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 22:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 22:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - I support deletion rather than redirection. She isn't notable, so delete or redirect, and I see redirecting as a statement that her greatest accomplishment in life is likely to remain winning a beauty pageant aged 19. I find that rather demeaning. Blythwood (talk) 22:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.