Talk:Bosnia and Herzegovina–NATO relations

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 2605:8D80:461:225A:C49:BA46:FBD:775C in topic NATO OCCUPATION

NATO OCCUPATION

edit

Serbs feel under occupation - they can even not celebrate January 9th as National Day! NATO stole Kosovo and gave it to Albanian Muslims. Bosnia was stolen too - Bosnian Muslims are allied to NATO, not Serbs ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.227.244.217 (talk) 15:06, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Cope harder. Jetpackrider (talk) 19:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Cope and seethe, bud. Cope and seethe. 2605:8D80:461:225A:C49:BA46:FBD:775C (talk) 14:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to NATO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply