Bluecatcinema

Welcome!

Hello, Bluecatcinema, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Bob talk 12:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Rank

Are you sure Rank appears in the 1981 Tales of the GL corps annual? I do not remember it. Also Guy Gardner does not know it when he faces it in Green Lantern Corps #4-5. So I rewote it to state that Gardner faces it in the recent GLC (which you omitted). --Leocomix 12:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Soundwave (Transformers)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Soundwave (Transformers). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 12:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Shockwave (Transformers)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Shockwave (Transformers). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 12:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Laserbeak

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Laserbeak. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 12:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Skunk fu!

there was no need for you to add a list of episodes to the main article, instead add any new episodes you find onto the List of Skunk Fu Episodes article--Lerdthenerd 19:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Sources needed

Every single one of those Amalgam entries needs a citation for its original source. In what comic did the character appear? If the character never appeared but was only mentioned, in what comic was that character first mentioned? Does the source clearly state which characters were merged? You've put in a lot of work, but without adding original source information, every bit of that material will wind up getting deleted. Doczilla 15:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced Amalgam characters to dozens, maybe hundreds of articles. There are too many bogus lists of supposed Amalgam characters to add any without citations for when they first appeared. You're creating an awful lot of work for other people who will either go through deleting every single thing you've gone to the trouble of adding or go through adding notations on everything. Doczilla 17:53, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. You have repeatedly added Amalgam Comics character names to articles without citing sources so that readers can know for certain that these do not involve errors, assumptions, hoaxes, or fan fiction. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add each character's first appearance to each of the articles. Otherwise, please remove the entries from the articles. Thank you. Doczilla 02:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Whizzer. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. But please do not add any assertions about supposed Amalgam Comics characters without including a proper citation for each character's first appearance, and please remove all of the statements you have already inserted into so many articles. For all the casual reader knows, every one of them might be correct or every one of them might be a hoax. Doczilla 18:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

• FYI: In case you never checked the final discussion archived at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Comics/Archive_29, you should know that members of WikiProject Comics agreed that most Amalgam Comics characters listed as other/alternate versions of different characters' articles should be removed from the mainstream characters' articles. Reasons were various, including but not limited to these: (1) No matter how obvious it sometimes is as to which characters were merged, Wikipedia requires sources. We're not supposed to say which character consisted of which other characters without specific confirmation from the sources. (2) There's usually no source to indicate that the characters ever even appeared in any comic. We don't know which actually appeared, which were mentioned metafictionally, which are fan fiction, and which could be altogether bogus. (3) Rarely are they meaningful to the real character's history, which renders them trivia. Doczilla 08:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey, where did you go?

How come you stopped adding in episodes to the Iggy Arbuckle page? There are only twenty-two currently mentioned; there's supposed to be twenty-six, and I can't remember the names of the others (well, actually, I wasn't even looking for the names; I was watching and waiting for Robear to make his appearance each time). Anyway, you also were able to identify their orders, because of the dates they aired on over in England. If you know the order of the other episodes, and their names, could you please go back to the page and include them? That would be much appreciated. (By the way, if you're wondering why the characters are back on the original page, it's because I got too emotional after User:Treelo removed most of the characters from the other page, and since I had asked for his assistance on that particular page, there wasn't much I could do about it. So I returned them to their original home, since I had not asked him for help there.) Thanks! Wilhelmina Will 02:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, they haven't aired any further episodes in the UK from the ones I put up, so I can't put any more up 'till they air a new run. Bluecatcinema 11:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Please comment.

Your attention would be welcome at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Comics#Amalgam_Comics_entries_must_die because the discussion going on there very much concerns you and your contributions to Wikipedia. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Doczilla 19:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: "The Whiz" -- You had linked to the Whiz's article, which is good. Unfortunately, in neither the Whizzer nor the Whiz articles did you provide a source as to which characters merged to form the Whiz. Did Marvel vs. DC show them merge? Did he have the origin of one and the secret identity of the other? If so, say so, and provide citations from the comic book publications. Unfornately #2: The article on the Whiz is a mess of a stub, written as if he were a true historical figure, rendering it a bad source. Doczilla 16:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Consensus and Wikipedia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm not sure if you have had the time to read all the links in your welcome notice, but you'll probably be aware that Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia. This means we work together to build a general reference work, making decisions through editing and discussion to generate a consensus. As you will be aware, there is discussion regarding whether to have entries and information for all the possible Amalgam characters. What we are relying on in discussing this issue are our notability guidance on fictional works, our manual of style concerning writing on fiction, our policy on what Wikipedia is not as well as our policies on sourcing, summarising and maintaining a balance. So far the feeling at WikiProject Comics is that there is no need to discuss every single amalgam character. If you have a differing opinion, please express it at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Comics#Amalgam_Comics_entries_must_die, and engage in collaboration. On Wikipedia, discussion and collaboration are key, and we have behavioural policies and guidance which detail actions that may be seen as disruptive, which can lead to an editor being blocked. Anyway, happy editing, and I look forward to collaborating with you and discussing this and many other points. Steve block Talk 10:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting the name!

Like the title says. I had looked, but I saw the name "Ansel" as "Aneel". It is hard to read small, white writing, especially in about three seconds, but I presumed that it was some central-European name. Thanks again for correcting it! Wilhelmina Will 19:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Generation Hex (comics)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Generation Hex (comics), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day!

User:Wilhelmina Will has wished you a happy Valentine's day, and good luck in love and friendship!

A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Blazing Dragons

Thanks for adding the section on Cinder and Clinker! They are one of my favourite characters, so I can't believe I forgot about them! :) GreyWyvern (talk) 03:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Your work on Scruff (TV series)

Hi Bluecatcinema - just dropping by with a quick thank you for the addition of the full character list to this article. It is appreciated - you ever need any help with something, lemme know! :) Thor Malmjursson (talk) 00:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Trinity.

Thanks for the story clean-up. I've being trying to get someone who was reading it to do that since July and finally someone has. Duggy 1138 (talk) 13:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Citations

Hi there. I've seen a lot of your edits on Green Lantern pages, and think it's great that you're one of the editors that takes the time to include a reliable citation with their contributions. It would be helpful to other contributers, though, if you could name your citations and include the publication date for comic book issues. Like, in the edit you just made to Agent Orange (DC Comics), the citation was actually already used on the page. The code for it, looks like this: <ref name="gl41">''Green Lantern'' (vol. 4) #41 (June 2009)</ref>

Because the citation is named, you could have just put in <ref name="gl41" /> and your text would have been connected to the citation that already existed on the article. -Hooliganb (talk) 00:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi, it's nice to see someone else taking an interest in the Green Lantern Corps and Sinestro Corps articles. I just wanted to say that I appreciate you not copying from anywhere, and ask that you keep an eye on the articles. I had to go through a few months back and take out a lot of entries that were copied directly out of the "Secret Files and Origins". Anything copied out of the is violating DC's copyright, and must be removed. If you could help out with keeping an eye on them, I would appreciate it. Sodam Yat (talk) 02:13, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Blackest Night 6

Please do not add information from a comic that has yet to go on sale.

- J Greb (talk) 23:21, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Iggy Arbuckle Wiki.

Hi Bluecatcinema! We used to collaborate on the pages relating to the show Iggy Arbuckle, remember? Well, back in November 2008, I applied in Wikia for a wiki dedicated to the show, for which here is a link to the "front" page, [1] If you'd like to come and help improve the wiki, that would be much appreciated. I've already given it a reasonable kick-start, and I've written some policies based on ones in Wikipedia, which you can see when you get there. Hope to see you then! Oh no! It's not here!!! (talk) 23:58, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:15, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Award

		The Special Barnstar
		Your numerous edits on articles about animated television series have led me to award you this Barnstar, especially for your fantastic character descriptions which I have found detailed in a excellent matter. Mr.Television (talk) 15:15, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ranx the Sentient City

The article Ranx the Sentient City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The fictional character does not meet the general notability guideline and, without reception and significance in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject, the topic of the article is not suitable for Wikipedia as a stand-alone article since it falls into WP:IINFO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jfgslo (talk) 02:15, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Groot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inhuman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:25, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Mac Gargan page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bluecatcinema. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bluecatcinema. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bluecatcinema. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gonzo the Mechanical Bastard

The article Gonzo the Mechanical Bastard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 21:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ranx the Sentient City for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ranx the Sentient City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranx the Sentient City until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 01:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Gonzo the Mechanical Bastard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gonzo the Mechanical Bastard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonzo the Mechanical Bastard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 17:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Doctor Diehard

The article Doctor Diehard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 15:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Disruptor (character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disruptor (character), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disruptor (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Reach (comics)

The article Reach (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 20:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Black Beetle (DC Comics)

The article Black Beetle (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 20:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Reach (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reach (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reach (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Black Beetle (DC Comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Beetle (DC Comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Beetle (DC Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 18:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)