Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alatrism (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes  talk 00:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alatrism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced after eleven years, seems to be a protologism that can only be found in sources that have copied from Wikipedia. Has been deleted once before through AfD in 2006. — surjection??21:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unsourced and apparently unverifiable, stub-length article (barely more than a definition), no assertion of notability, could have been deleted speedily per G4 (Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion). Vox Sciurorum (talk) 22:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I agree with the other opinions about this. It appears to be unverifiable and the article is no more then a definition. So, this isn't a notable enough concept to warrant an article about it. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.