Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asim jofa

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Asim jofa

edit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Asim jofa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. All awards they claim to have won are very much non notable. A before search reveals hits in unreliable self published sources. Furthermore, even the sources used in the article are a combination of primary sources and unreliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the Showbiz Fashion bio is far from a reliable source; the usual red flags being the obligatory 'net worth' and 'horoscope' sections; no indication of where they get this info from at all. If we added such info to BLPs on Wikipedia it would be a massive violation of our WP:BLP policy. Whilst Dawn is a reliable source but this article is self-submitted 'Images Staff Desk Report' rather than professional journalism so does not indicate notability. Nothing decent coming up in searches. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*speedy Delete I tagged this article in the first place for quick deletion, and creating a poll was unreasonable in my opinion because the article with.No reliable sources to establish GNG.--MadD (talk) 16:08, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Striking out !vote from a banned editor. Celestina007 (talk) 01:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MADdi0X, not unreasonable, the tag wasn’t appropriate, a claim to have won awards(albeit non notable) invalidated the A7 tag. I hope you understand. Celestina007 (talk) 17:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Celestina007: I understand, my friend, but you could have labeled it properly so.I say this to take the time to improve other articles.--MadD (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MADdi0X, I’m lost, what do you mean labeled it properly? The A7 tag was bound to be declined and the proper thing to have done was to send it to AFD which I did. I appreciate your efforts but working with CSD’s can be tricky Celestina007 (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Asim_jofa&oldid=1018400402"