User talk:Stephenfryfan

October 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sia (musician) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sia (musician) was changed by Stephenfryfan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870391 on 2020-10-05T16:03:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

You are making mistakes. BOT! Stephenfryfan (talk) 16:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Cluebot has no clue that sia has two non biological black boys. Not her own. Stephenfryfan (talk) 16:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but you can't talk to a bot that way. It's not programmed to respond. If you need any help just ask me, or use the resources in the welcome I have left below. Sam at Megaputer (talk) 20:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Cluebot's changes were correct. It is not necessary to state, in the infobox, that they are non-biological. If you wish to discuss this, do it at the article's Talk page, rather than here. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

The recent edits you made to the infobox at Sia (musician) constitute WP:EDIT WARring and have been reverted. Please do not continue to Edit War, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. In addition, if you wish to add new information to an article, you must cite your source(s). See WP:V and WP:RS. Thank you. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

@Sslivers Cluebot's changes were grossly INCORRECT. READ... IT REVERTED WHICH I DUDUCTED. , but all of these struggled to connect with a mainstream audience

Stephenfryfan (talk) 17:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

-- Ssilvers Stephenfryfan (talk) 17:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Stephenfryfan! Thank you for your contributions. I am Sam at Megaputer and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. If you wish to contact me on this page, please use {{Ping|Sam at Megaputer}} such that I get notified of your request. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Sam at Megaputer (talk) 20:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

You are so nice. Stephenfryfan (talk) 20:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

No problem. If you have any questions, just ask. Sam at Megaputer (talk) 21:38, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cornell Law School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 06:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

What was the error? Stephenfryfan (talk) 06:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I completely misread the sequence of edits. It would have been an error to say that Cornell was one of three Ivy League law schools, but you fixed that right away, changing it back to five. In the end, the only error was a grammatical issue (not a sourcing issue), as "the five only" should be "one of five" or (less neutrally) "one of only five". Thanks for being open to feedback. Larry Hockett (Talk) 06:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

I do thank you for your openness on my feedback. Stephenfryfan (talk) 12:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Test pilot, you may be blocked from editing. Please.don't add fictional people to lists of actual people - it can be.considered vandalism.Template:Z188 BilCat (talk) 08:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Sentence under italic typeset is okay. But... dear negro billcat you should not say it was desruptive nor vandalism. It was a matter of judgmental error perhaps. I thought ppl would relate from fictional character much easily to consume this nerdy article. DON'T write at my talk page offending me. I hope you realize it predator! Thanks. Stephenfryfan (talk) 12:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Abbyjjjj96. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jerry Hall, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 22:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Why don't 6a just add a link to that? Check on Khan's wiki. Thanks. Stephenfryfan (talk) 17:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Some of his out of marriage relationships included relationship with Zeenat Aman,[326] Emma Sergeant, Susie Murray-Philipson, Sita White, Sarah Crawley,[1] Stephanie Beacham, Goldie Hawn, Kristiane Backer, Susannah Constantine, Marie Helvin, Caroline Kellett,[327] Liza Campbell,[55] Anastasia Cooke, Hannah Mary Rothschild,[328] Jerry Hall, and Lulu Blacker.[329][330] Stephenfryfan (talk) 17:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Consider undoing reversion or correcting khan's wiki. Thanks. Stephenfryfan (talk) 17:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Martinevans123. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Theroadislong (talk) 10:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry... but i just COULDN'T stop. Thanks though. I should talk more appropriately. Stephenfryfan (talk) 10:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

I was just having an assumption that he might look like predator R Kelly. But... martinevans can be not a rapist thpugh. I am sorry again. BTW I commented for editing purpise only. Not to hurt. Stephenfryfan (talk) 10:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Death of Harry Dunn shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Okay... but didn't you do it too? 😂 thanks for trying to make me realized. Stephenfryfan (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

I have no animosity towards BLACK AND MUSLIMS to put it on record. He is trying to make it black. Thanks. I will be more cautious. Stephenfryfan (talk) 14:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

it was hard luck actually. Farewell! Stephenfryfan (talk) 02:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Stephenfryfan

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Stephenfryfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's a typo; AUTO CORRECT! But not funny obviously. I am too much in depression about my insecurities. It was shameful as well. More importantly... it could hurt defacto to make them uninterested to be on wp. I DON'T want to plead for any consideration. I just need to assert due apology. That's all. Goodbye.

I wasn't more in hold of mind. I often used that word on other occasions and it is on my personalised auto correct suggestions. Okay... let me admit that it is grossly irresponsible not to look at what i am typing. I would definitely be angrier had someone labelled me as such albeit by mistake or blunder.

I wasn't in hold of my mind. That's for sure to address this reckless misconduct. I know that it will personally cause me a ptsd in my nostalgic rewinding of my deeds. You are right.

It was both a combination of auto correct failires and typographical mistakes. I take the full responsibility for it finally. I just COULDN'T help to confess I was TOTALLY inconsiderate. Here none does jobs for personal benefits but to make it socially endorsed learning of matters with comprehensive details. I was arrogant and fruatrated that why would it be unacceptable to include full name of a vigilant. But taking full responsibility to shame escape from law was not a good example for myself. It made me to do what i was fighting against. That was hell of a bipolarity for to be privileged with edit icon. Remorseful.

This was for me to confess. Stephenfryfan (talk) 02:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It's a typo; AUTO CORRECT! But not funny obviously. I am too much in depression about my insecurities. It was shameful as well. More importantly... it could hurt defacto to make them uninterested to be on wp. I DON'T want to plead for any consideration. I just need to assert due apology. That's all. Goodbye. I wasn't more in hold of mind. I often used that word on other occasions and it is on my personalised auto correct suggestions. Okay... let me admit that it is grossly irresponsible not to look at what i am typing. I would definitely be angrier had someone labelled me as such albeit by mistake or blunder. I wasn't in hold of my mind. That's for sure to address this reckless misconduct. I know that it will personally cause me a ptsd in my nostalgic rewinding of my deeds. You are right. It was both a combination of auto correct failires and typographical mistakes. I take the full responsibility for it finally. I just COULDN'T help to confess I was TOTALLY inconsiderate. Here none does jobs for personal benefits but to make it socially endorsed learning of matters with comprehensive details. I was arrogant and fruatrated that why would it be unacceptable to include full name of a vigilant. But taking full responsibility to shame escape from law was not a good example for myself. It made me to do what i was fighting against. That was hell of a bipolarity for to be privileged with edit icon. Remorseful. This was for me to confess. [[User:Stephenfryfan|Stephenfryfan]] ([[User talk:Stephenfryfan#top|talk]]) 02:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=It's a typo; AUTO CORRECT! But not funny obviously. I am too much in depression about my insecurities. It was shameful as well. More importantly... it could hurt defacto to make them uninterested to be on wp. I DON'T want to plead for any consideration. I just need to assert due apology. That's all. Goodbye. I wasn't more in hold of mind. I often used that word on other occasions and it is on my personalised auto correct suggestions. Okay... let me admit that it is grossly irresponsible not to look at what i am typing. I would definitely be angrier had someone labelled me as such albeit by mistake or blunder. I wasn't in hold of my mind. That's for sure to address this reckless misconduct. I know that it will personally cause me a ptsd in my nostalgic rewinding of my deeds. You are right. It was both a combination of auto correct failires and typographical mistakes. I take the full responsibility for it finally. I just COULDN'T help to confess I was TOTALLY inconsiderate. Here none does jobs for personal benefits but to make it socially endorsed learning of matters with comprehensive details. I was arrogant and fruatrated that why would it be unacceptable to include full name of a vigilant. But taking full responsibility to shame escape from law was not a good example for myself. It made me to do what i was fighting against. That was hell of a bipolarity for to be privileged with edit icon. Remorseful. This was for me to confess. [[User:Stephenfryfan|Stephenfryfan]] ([[User talk:Stephenfryfan#top|talk]]) 02:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=It's a typo; AUTO CORRECT! But not funny obviously. I am too much in depression about my insecurities. It was shameful as well. More importantly... it could hurt defacto to make them uninterested to be on wp. I DON'T want to plead for any consideration. I just need to assert due apology. That's all. Goodbye. I wasn't more in hold of mind. I often used that word on other occasions and it is on my personalised auto correct suggestions. Okay... let me admit that it is grossly irresponsible not to look at what i am typing. I would definitely be angrier had someone labelled me as such albeit by mistake or blunder. I wasn't in hold of my mind. That's for sure to address this reckless misconduct. I know that it will personally cause me a ptsd in my nostalgic rewinding of my deeds. You are right. It was both a combination of auto correct failires and typographical mistakes. I take the full responsibility for it finally. I just COULDN'T help to confess I was TOTALLY inconsiderate. Here none does jobs for personal benefits but to make it socially endorsed learning of matters with comprehensive details. I was arrogant and fruatrated that why would it be unacceptable to include full name of a vigilant. But taking full responsibility to shame escape from law was not a good example for myself. It made me to do what i was fighting against. That was hell of a bipolarity for to be privileged with edit icon. Remorseful. This was for me to confess. [[User:Stephenfryfan|Stephenfryfan]] ([[User talk:Stephenfryfan#top|talk]]) 02:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

.

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 –Novem Linguae (talk) 23:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

@Novem Lingiae: got it. Stephenfryfan (talk) 09:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for harassing at least one editor.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I didn't know i attacked someone within 24 hours personally or anyway. It was best if could mention a particular incident. Stephenfryfan (talk) 02:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I quit then better. Good luck! Bad luck for me. Stephenfryfan (talk) 02:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I was a inconsiderate measure, --ToBeFree--. Have you not been free yet? You are at least a 24 year old guy... immature indeed. I will find my way. I DON'T obey by someone of my age. Farewell from Stephenfryfan! Stephenfryfan (talk) 02:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)