Talk:Denis Rancourt

References

Tenure

Rancourt has stated that the tenure-granting process is designed to produce obedient academics that question and challenge neither the fundamental sources of oppression in society nor the undemocratic governance structures of the universities they are employed in. He has argued that professors must use the unique privileges and protections offered by tenure to confront injustices and oppression, including within their universities, where they have the greatest influence and ability to effect change. Rancourt has written that:

One antidote to the university as boot camp in the service of capital is for tenured professors to use their tenure. This would turn tenure on its head, as it is free society’s coercive tool of choice for fabricating aligned and docile academics. Not the job security in itself, which should be available to all, but the filtering and moulding process known as the tenure track. But why not turn tenure on its head? Tenure is death, risk is life, and collaboration is criminal. Collaborating in an institutionalized system of resource looting, labour exploitation, and genocidal demographic engineering is criminal, especially when its ultimate weapon is the foremost crime known as war, such as the present Canadian war in Afghanistan.

Additional information regarding tenure is available.

References

Fringe theories template for climate change views

I think the template has been addressed and can be removed. --Hob Gadling (talk) 16:55, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Hm... I guess I was wrong. There are no reliable sources here, only crackpots.

But here is a good source for other crazy anti-science views of this guy: [2] - apparently he believes there are no viruses. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)