User talk:Ealdgyth: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Ealdgyth/Archive 102) (bot |
→FAR: new section |
||
Line 299: | Line 299: | ||
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 12:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC) |
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 12:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
== FAR == |
|||
I have nominated [[Middle Ages]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Middle Ages/archive1|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]].<!--Template:FARMessage--> [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 03:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:36, 24 June 2024
I absolutely despise talkpage templates. Please don't use them here. If you do use one, by all the gods, sign it so it archives and put it in its own section! |
I prefer to keep both sides of my discussions together. If you leave me a message here, I will reply here. But if I left a note on your talk page, feel free to reply there or here, as I'm watching your page for a bit. |
Archive 1 May 2007 to Jan 2008 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
WikiCup 2022 September newsletter
Signups open for The Core Contest
The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—will take place this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24.
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.
WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
- Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
- Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
- Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
Welcome to the drive!
Welcome, welcome, welcome Ealdgyth! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:46, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
- Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.
- The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351
- The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
- The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.
- WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|
454 | Wand (talk) | Add sources | |
153 | Oda Nobutada (talk) | Add sources | |
640 | Azuchi–Momoyama period (talk) | Add sources | |
85 | Sanada Masayuki (talk) | Add sources | |
131 | Tirunelveli district (talk) | Add sources | |
647 | French Wars of Religion (talk) | Add sources | |
68 | People of the Sengoku period in popular culture (talk) | Cleanup | |
812 | Honnō-ji Incident (talk) | Cleanup | |
427 | Battle of Khanwa (talk) | Cleanup | |
4 | 1565 in Sweden (talk) | Expand | |
31 | Gunshi Kanbei (talk) | Expand | |
16 | Military history of Norway (talk) | Expand | |
348 | Udai Singh II (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | |
5,099 | Shōgun (novel) (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | |
9 | Naitō Nobunari (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | |
6 | Beglerbegi (talk) | Merge | |
231 | Monster Hunter World: Iceborne (talk) | Merge | |
94 | 2024 Iranian missile strikes in Pakistan (talk) | Merge | |
26 | Siege of Groenlo (1627) (talk) | Wikify | |
14 | Remigius de Fécamp (talk) | Wikify | |
196 | Lanyard (talk) | Wikify | |
9 | Campaign of Tahmasp I (1552) (talk) | Orphan | |
2 | Sabaji Koli (talk) | Orphan | |
3 | CALLUP net (talk) | Orphan | |
31 | Sassa Narimasa (talk) | Stub | |
4 | Argideen River (talk) | Stub | |
11 | Myōki (talk) | Stub | |
12 | Milan police headquarters bombing (talk) | Stub | |
51 | Hōjō Ujinao (talk) | Stub | |
14 | Hōjō Ujiteru (talk) | Stub |
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
FAR
I have nominated Middle Ages for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Borsoka (talk) 03:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)