User talk:Ksy92003: Difference between revisions
Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs) m Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Ksy92003/Archive-May2007 |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
I update piece by piece because that is much less likely to cause edit conflicts. And I get into a lot of those. [[User:Soxrock|Soxrock]] 03:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC) |
I update piece by piece because that is much less likely to cause edit conflicts. And I get into a lot of those. [[User:Soxrock|Soxrock]] 03:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
Fine. I get into these habits, and they're hard to break out of. I'll try, but don't bank on me editing them all in one. I'm not one to do a single large edit but more like several small edits. Sorry :( [[User:Soxrock|Soxrock]] 00:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:41, 25 May 2007
Re [1]
With regards to your comments on User talk:Hornberry: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. John254 21:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
2007 New York Mets season
Excuse me, I apologize if my constructive edit offended you. As you probably can understand, many people update this template on a regular basis- many times they are unfamiliar with the Wiki format and hence add information in wrong places, or for that matter add information that is downright wrong. Having easy access to box-scores would make it easier for people to cross-reference statistics to make sure everything is in order. I am willing to prompt a vote for this, and unless there is a general consensus that this information is unworthy of appearing, consider this issue very much open. Rpgman456 02:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Updates
Sorry, but no rule is in place to prevent it, and if it really bothers you, i'll just do the <-- to hide it until it's conclusion. It's no big deal as far as I'm concerned. Soxrock 02:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Question
Can you go a day without starting an edit war? Seriously!++aviper2k7++ 03:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know why you left that message on my talk page, to be honest. I'm not involved in an edit war right now. I made one edit to 2007 Milwaukee Brewers season, which you reverted. I haven't re-reverted you. So I honestly don't see why you believe that I'm currently involved in an edit war. --Ksy92003 (talk) 03:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Around the Horn
Yeah, but then again, only one person wins. Therefore, the other three cities that didn't win already have their % adjusted, reducing the need to do that after the show. Soxrock 22:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Fine, the number of edits will be identical, but I'll only change the % after a player is eliminated. Good enough? Soxrock 23:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Uh, no. I mean, when the show starts, I'll do the appearances for the appearences, peron, and cities column. When player and city X gets eliminated, then I'll reduce the %. When player anc city Y win, I'll change the % to the most accurate. I'm not saying that I'll overrule, I'm just stating a good idea, at least in my mind. Soxrock 23:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Game logs
I update piece by piece because that is much less likely to cause edit conflicts. And I get into a lot of those. Soxrock 03:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Fine. I get into these habits, and they're hard to break out of. I'll try, but don't bank on me editing them all in one. I'm not one to do a single large edit but more like several small edits. Sorry :( Soxrock 00:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)